(b)(1) No record shall be withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.

So I told it to try again without stealing.

I wouldn't publish it, but it's too dull to be mad about. No shame in not doing as well as Minard did with the same data but this feels like a unintentionally sad powerpoint presentation.

It simply redrew the Minard map, but with some six-finger-esque AI touches like mangled text. Pretty good to figure out what the data was, but bad form to just pick-pocket old Charles-Joseph.

In fairness, Nano Banana Pro was onto me almost immediately...

I don’t work there any more. I get what you mean. But a position in a union contract negotiation is not the same as management saying they want to publish AI slop. There are other explanations.

I worked there for 15 years. You will never find a group of people less likely to fake a byline, or who sweat accuracy more than they do. You don’t mean to say otherwise, I suspect.

It literally says their names.

Why on earth would you think this was written by AI? It literally has a byline (it’s at the bottom — in my day we put those at the top).

No shame in a little manifesting.

Small world. I was shouting you out at a conference as you posted this. It was positive, don’t worry.

What’s this chart’s name, private?