Testimonies to the EMSC describe the earthquake as a "decent little jolt".

www.emsc-csem.org/Earthquake_i...

And mostly, thanks to our readers for showing us that someone cares! It makes a real difference. I believe that we can foster a culture where more people understand how earthquakes work, what makes them interesting, and how to manage risks. Science is under attack. This is how we fight back.

5/5

If you can't afford the published rate, let us know what you can pay - we don't want finances to be a barrier to learning. We'll work something out.

4/5

If you are a student or researcher at a university, ask the department if they could fund a group subscription. Universities have budgets for this kind of thing (and we offer group discounts).

3/5

We started with the goal of making a difference, and I think we are: >8600 subscribers, mentions in major news sites, and grateful messages from people, from teachers to journalists to people feeling shaking.

Help us keep growing our impact by subscribing.

2/5

If they’re looking at tsunami warning systems, we can talk hours of warning time. For earthquakes, realistic warning times are tens of seconds! I wish the project didn’t present false science about earthquakes to teach this lesson.

I love these!

These cuts represent both an immediate loss (the science) and a permanent one (the researchers who leave). In some cases, data collection was cut short, meaning that earlier work was wasted.

At Earthquake Insights, Kyle and I were part of a project to study the resilience of communities to compounding natural disasters. That, too, was a casualty of this administration's cuts to funding.