https://eml.berkeley.edu/~jsteinsson/
- defence spending above 1% of GDP exempt from debt brake
- 10-year €500bn special fund for infrastructure
- looser debt rules for states
- further debt-brake reform in new Bundestag
- defence spending above 1% of GDP exempt from debt brake
- 10-year €500bn special fund for infrastructure
- looser debt rules for states
- further debt-brake reform in new Bundestag
🇺🇸 +9.4%
🇮🇹 +6.5% (thru Q3)
🇯🇵 +3.1%
🇫🇷 +1.8% (thru Q3)
🇬🇧 -1.1%
🇩🇪 -1.9% (thru Q3)
🇨🇦 -2.0% (thru Q3)
"Not realizing they oversee the country's weapons stockpile"
"Not realizing they oversee the country's weapons stockpile"
The idea is that optimal climate policy is a carbon tax of ~$200/ton, and IRA is equivalent to a carbon tax around $10/ton, so we need 20x stronger policy.
That's wrong 🧵
The idea is that optimal climate policy is a carbon tax of ~$200/ton, and IRA is equivalent to a carbon tax around $10/ton, so we need 20x stronger policy.
That's wrong 🧵
But this new analysis convinces me that Oprea (2024) is substantially wrong. In my opinion, the paper should be retracted.
The paper is comment on Ryan Oprea's recent AER paper.
The paper is processing, but you, my friends, get early entry.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
But this new analysis convinces me that Oprea (2024) is substantially wrong. In my opinion, the paper should be retracted.
eml.berkeley.edu/~jsteinsson/...
eml.berkeley.edu/~jsteinsson/...
eml.berkeley.edu/~jsteinsson/...
eml.berkeley.edu/~jsteinsson/...
www.nytimes.com/live/2025/01...
www.nytimes.com/live/2025/01...
www.nytimes.com/2025/01/15/o...
www.nytimes.com/2025/01/15/o...
ember-energy.org/latest-insig...
ember-energy.org/latest-insig...