No surprise Rehnquist dissented in that case.

Paul, you don't need to teach Dred Scott as good law. You just have to teach Dred Scott & Plessy from a colorblind perspective. Some guy wanted to ride the train. Other people didn't want him there. Why? Who knows. But he sued & lost. Another guy wanted freedom, but SCOTUS said no, you can't sue.

I'm not familiar with journalistic ethics, but one would think that would violate them.

I'd need to see the substance of the argument.

Feels as though these questions require a real clear-eyed look at the relationship between Congress and the executive, and the implications of this moment for separation of powers

NGL I am not confident SCOTUS is up to the task

You should use the one on the left as your faculty photo. 😉

I'd prefer to write a response to the Harv L Rev guards. Harv L Rev's frontcourt is much more talented than its backcourt. 🙃

Wait, if Argo is in the back, who's driving?!?!?!

Our criminal legal system continues to embarrass itself when it comes to holding the powerful and wealthy accountable.

Not for all the money in the world would I stay in that house.

But if you were going to rank your children...