Jennifer R
jennired83.bsky.social
Jennifer R
@jennired83.bsky.social
Left handed left coast resident. Breast cancer survivor, mom of humans and cats. Also a software tester. Peace, love, and environmental justice.
Reposted by Jennifer R
It isn't true that the Supreme Court majority are in charge. We are. There is absolutely no reason to permit these fascists to rule our lives for another day.
December 4, 2025 at 11:17 PM
Reposted by Jennifer R
Anyway, I'm no grand scholar of the judiciary, and all of this is just my own two cents and perhaps I'm overreading the extent to which the lower courts are going to be upset, but as someone who cares deeply about *facts,* I'm mostly just frustrated about the extent to which this Court doesn't.
December 4, 2025 at 11:22 PM
Reposted by Jennifer R
The reason the judiciary functions is because judges understand that despite everyone being human beings who hold grudges and have stupid opinions and peccadilloes and flaws, there is a sense that you have to justify what you're doing on more than "because I say so."

This Court is undermining that.
December 4, 2025 at 11:14 PM
Reposted by Jennifer R
It's not just liberal judges they're doing this to. They're doing this to plenty of conservative judges too; judges who actually spent weeks and weeks poring over the details and with their arms deep in the guts of thousands of pages of documents and days of testimony.

Those judges are pissed.
December 4, 2025 at 11:12 PM
Reposted by Jennifer R
I don't think the Justices understand the extent to which they are playing with fire. The more they do this, the more District Courts will engage in open disrespect of the Supreme Court, because what other response is there to open disrespect directed at them? That's bad for the Judiciary, period.
December 4, 2025 at 11:11 PM
Reposted by Jennifer R
As Justice Kagan begins her dissent by pointing out, what is even the point of trial, of fact-finding, of clear error, of standards of review, when the Supreme Court simply ignores every single part of that and decides everything purely on the papers without any real consideration of the facts?
December 4, 2025 at 11:08 PM
Reposted by Jennifer R
The Supreme Court majority has decided that they are the fact-finders, and the facts are what they want them to be, and quite frankly if District Courts disagree, they can pound sand because they're not the ones in charge.

They're right about the last part. But the damage they're doing is longterm.
December 4, 2025 at 11:09 PM
Mine would have me nurse their toy cars
December 4, 2025 at 11:04 PM
Reposted by Jennifer R
IMO, combatting ICE should be our #1 priority.

People are finding creative ways to run them out of town or otherwise block them, but it should be the task of every Gov, State Law Enforcement, State AG, Mayors, & MOC's to devise one plan & communicate it to us.

We need proactive - not reactive.
December 4, 2025 at 9:11 PM