good luck working through that and feeling better soon hopefully

Oh no what a devastating time for you all - I’m sorry 😭 😭 😭

So sorry Raffi, after the shock there will be time for celebrating his life but I’m sure right now it’s so hard - thoughts with you and all the Melkonians

Wishwashing

*the whole “washing“ thing is out of hand but perhaps it fits here too

I put in the transcript of the show cause hearing from Mata v Avianca and prompted a timeline of events - it was amusing bc it had many dated ifems and a few under ”undated items” including “at some point attorney receives training in legal research and digests”

This can be done now - heard others on here using NotebookLM for it, and Lexis Protege with Vault document upload seems like a possibility as well - others are worth trying too. I’m sure Harvey does this but $$$

On my nascent class reading list: The Verification-Value Paradox papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

Could you see law students learning from that in some way? currently exploring whether and how to have them use more than the obvious general and general legal platforms

Have you tried Harvey? interested if you think it’s great or overrated; I’ve heard both

My “AI and Legal Writing” class next semester is going to have a whole project on responding to this crap VIGOROUSLY on an individual basis and hopefully reducing systematic likelihood. Fake AI “law” makes life difficult and expensive for everyone WHY

I like the mudroom with no door that you have to cross all common living areas to get to

There are TikToks about this!

A study just suggested this - AI information erases Dunning-Kruger in that it’s now *not only* low-knowledge becoming overconfident in whatever they think they know

What I think as a matter of logic is not the same as what might fly with (barely) supporting a good faith basis. Waive is a choice and maybe more rational across parties — like just start litigating now, here. Default seems more idiosyncratic and subjective? But maybe not with the SAD cases

If it’s ever happened before in a similar case with sort of similar parties, they could rationalize that they inferred a good faith basis it will also happen here

Bootstrapping by extremely stretched inference-like reasoning