James Dyke
jamesgdyke.info
James Dyke
@jamesgdyke.info
Earth systems prof & assistant director of @gsiexeter.bsky.social | Technosphere Earth newsletter https://www.technosphere.earth
There is more than one way up a mountain, not to mention there being very large uncertainties about climate sensitivity to greenhouse gas increases and landuse change.
November 17, 2025 at 4:08 PM
Reposted by James Dyke
I've been thinking along similar lines lately...

bsky.app/profile/thie...
Charts like this paint an overly optimistic picture

Many countries are off track for delivery & are unlikely to fully implement their current policy targets without greater action

E.g UKs Climate Change Commitee asseses that there is insufficient implementation to meet 40%of our emissions target!
November 17, 2025 at 1:17 PM
🤯
November 17, 2025 at 1:36 PM
I am 19.35% more annoyed at the state of the world this morning than I would have been if I had not read this article.
November 17, 2025 at 11:06 AM
What we can say right now is the 50% budget for 1.5°C is nearly gone while emissions are at all-time high. Warming will soon exceed 1.5°C & then some. Any prospect for warming around 2°C needs immediate start of fossil fuel phase out. Much of the 'analysis' beyond this point is speculation & bull💩
November 17, 2025 at 11:00 AM
Reposted by James Dyke
We estimated the share of scientists who believe that "advances in technology will largely solve the problems caused by climate change" and used causally informed Bayesian regression models to estimate the impact of techno-optimism on scientists' civic actions and high-impact lifestyle changes.
November 14, 2025 at 9:20 AM
Reposted by James Dyke
A new Nature paper accompanying the Global Carbon Budget finds that the land and ocean sinks are 25% smaller and 7% smaller, respectively, than they would have been without the effects of climate change over 2015-24:
Emerging climate impact on carbon sinks in a consolidated carbon budget | Nature
Despite the adoption of the Paris Agreement ten years ago, fossil CO2 emissions continue to rise, pushing atmospheric CO2 levels to 423 ppm in 2024 and driving human-induced warming to 1.36°C, within years of breaching the 1.5°C limit 1,2. Accurate reporting of anthropogenic and natural CO2 sources and sinks is a prerequisite to tracking the effectiveness of climate policy and detecting carbon sink responses to climate change. Yet notable mismatches between reported emissions and sinks have so far prevented confident interpretation of their trends and drivers 1. Here, we present and integrate recent advances in observations and process understanding to address some long-standing issues in the global carbon budget estimates. We show that the magnitude of the natural land sink is substantially smaller than previously estimated, while net emissions from anthropogenic land-use change are revised upwards 1. The ocean sink is 15% larger than the land sink, consistent with new evidence from oceanic and atmospheric observations 3,4. Climate change reduces the efficiency of the sinks, particularly on land, contributing 8.3 ± 1.4 ppm to the atmospheric CO2 increase since 1960. The combined effects of climate change and deforestation turn Southeast Asian and large parts of South American tropical forests from CO2 sinks to sources. This underscores the need to halt deforestation and limit warming to prevent further loss of carbon stored on land. Improved confidence in assessments of CO2 sources and sinks is fundamental for effective climate policy.
www.nature.com
November 13, 2025 at 3:26 AM
There wouldn't be any criminal activity if we locked everyone up.
Tkt Smart GIF
Alt: Man taps the side of his head indicating that this is how you figure something out.
media.tenor.com
November 13, 2025 at 8:12 AM
Excellent work!
November 13, 2025 at 8:10 AM