In fact, I'd argue the opposite. Were I a sex pest (which I'm NOT), my best work would've probably come from being "in the zone", i.e. a consequence-free sex pest. It was probably a very empowering environment for creativity.

Louie is a sex pest but not a sex criminal, so if he wants to do stand up and people want to pay to see it, none of my business. But let's not act like there's been some concerted effort to silence him when it's actually just a matter of the same market forces that brought him his initial success.

Like what the fuck are these people even talking about? They still have editors at the New Yorker?

The rule should be you have to say which other President you think is more corrupt and how you came to that conclusion.