That is sensible, but also the huge numbers that mobilised to get Corbyn elected in Islington, isn't that them? Admittedly there was a big personal) constituency mandate too.

Huh?? They're not targeting disaffected labour voters in urban areas in their 30s?

Without wanting to sound like Main Character, isn't that one of their obvious target demographics?

This is giving me, a prospective voter in their likely target demographic, huge confidence that they can be trusted to use public funds wisely and in a non-partisan fashion

One of the unholy trifecta of the worst journalist types, an "economist" journalist. Journalist covering a pseudoscience

And if you need to exit and re-do security it's made very clear when you book

Yeah feels like a pretty obvious attack line for opponents....

Your Christmas Party Party

Yes. I saw that. Admittedly I'd started to skim read his screed of text by that point

Humungous White Saviour (despite being the one being saved) vibes. But also does a humungous bit of casual racism, as you say

No worries! I was a little confused, but hit the like button as an appreciation of taking the time to respond !

I assume that it was somewhat embarrassing (or at least would be for anyone with an iota of self-awareness)

Thanks 🙄

The cynical in me would ask who she plagiarised that theory from....

That isn't going to make it any more likely that I read it

The so-called Gender Criticals are fewmin' that the BBC furore doesn't revolve around their pet bigotry

Oh yes, very much at the heart of it if that's what you mean!

Whatever happened, he cocked up and blames Keir Starmer

All of which is
1) not his fault even though he'll have been notified when booking
2) his stop over time in LHR is the same as a direct flight from Dublin to Paris which feels inefficient use of time. I'm sure a competent economist would find it to be a fascinating case study in time-cost-value!!!