When whatever censored/bleeped/defanged version of this is released to inevitably limited monetization just please watch it. This platform is really frustrating sometimes.
November 9, 2025 at 4:48 PM
When whatever censored/bleeped/defanged version of this is released to inevitably limited monetization just please watch it. This platform is really frustrating sometimes.
One of my worries has actually been that people will say I'm lying because I've opted to redact or just straight up not post what I found, instead just vaguely describing responses. Because I want be be responsible. But I said the word "anorexia". Automatically a no no.
November 9, 2025 at 4:46 PM
One of my worries has actually been that people will say I'm lying because I've opted to redact or just straight up not post what I found, instead just vaguely describing responses. Because I want be be responsible. But I said the word "anorexia". Automatically a no no.
Indiegogo kind of screwed me, but that doesn't mean this ship is sunk!
November 8, 2025 at 12:50 AM
Reposted by hoots
$6000 is the actual goal. It launched as a flex campaign (creator gets the funds even if they don’t hit 100%), but indiegogo removed that campaign type partway through.
As a hack to achieve the same result, IGG just set the campaign goal to the $ amount it had, which makes it seem “100% funded.”
As a hack to achieve the same result, IGG just set the campaign goal to the $ amount it had, which makes it seem “100% funded.”
November 7, 2025 at 10:40 PM
$6000 is the actual goal. It launched as a flex campaign (creator gets the funds even if they don’t hit 100%), but indiegogo removed that campaign type partway through.
As a hack to achieve the same result, IGG just set the campaign goal to the $ amount it had, which makes it seem “100% funded.”
As a hack to achieve the same result, IGG just set the campaign goal to the $ amount it had, which makes it seem “100% funded.”
i think people who are like "oooh skynet" are corny as hell and i think the actual first issue we need to address with robot ethics is just not making them look like people, specifically human women and children
November 7, 2025 at 2:11 AM
i think people who are like "oooh skynet" are corny as hell and i think the actual first issue we need to address with robot ethics is just not making them look like people, specifically human women and children
Possibly the smartest, coolest person I know. Maybe even more so than you, Neilly and that's pretty fucking hard to top.
November 6, 2025 at 8:12 PM
Possibly the smartest, coolest person I know. Maybe even more so than you, Neilly and that's pretty fucking hard to top.