X does not count as a counterexample

What's the best discussion of the case for believing this

And!

They saw Sodom's sins and failed to rebuke them

Rubio and others who want regime change by force are messaging/leaking in the hope that the regime collapses without the US doing anything or Maduro escalates to force the skeptics in the administration to go along

Here's what I think is fair to say:
- the Trump Administration has been marked by extreme, obvious, and cross-domain illegality
- just on the merits, a lot of rulings rejecting challenges have been wrong, some outrageously so
- Republican appointees have done less well than Democratic appointees

The shadow docket statistics are also not a representative sample because the SG only brings stay requests to the Supreme Court when he thinks the likelihood of success is high--lots of lower court injunctions against the Trump Administration have not reached the Supreme Court

Because of the blue slip and for other reasons even Republican-appointed judges in liberal places are more liberal, and also they are somewhat known quantities, the challengers pick a district where their chance of a good draw is high

There's nothing about the text of the statute that limits it to Kelly (as opposed to the other Dems) right? I suppose they might prefer to do this in military court for other reasons

Still seems odd to sell the mansion to pay a judgment that's 2.5% of the asset value, does she have no reachable more liquid assets?

No, they (correctly) figure that this headline notwithstanding they will get mostly friendly treatment from the UK press, and they are probably correct

It may work! The government is run by cowards! But the story here is actually that (surprisingly!) they don't seem eager to follow the EHRC here

Starmer is very bad including on this issue but what's happening here is that EHRC is strategically leaking against the Starmer government to pressure it to adopt EHRC's draconian transphobic policy (which is what the article is describing)

This reads like triangulating--she thinks the boat strikes are illegal but aren't unpopular enough to invoke in defense of her statement

Hadley Freeman: "gender ideology" is anti-gravity

Elphaba Thropp: