HannibabbleAlphaB
@hannibabblealphab.bsky.social
Non-binary, bi, & trans
e/em/emself/eir/eirs (just say it in Cockney)- I exist, just like you do.
Viewer Discretion ! I re-tweet explicit content and discuss mature content.
Oh, and I like moss. :)
>>Do NOT add me to "lists", “starter packs”, etc.<<
The tapwater tastes like swamp water with a touch of pencil leads. Yum.
November 27, 2025 at 5:29 PM
The tapwater tastes like swamp water with a touch of pencil leads. Yum.
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
Real power is being able to cut them off from their revenue stream.
What is the latest Black Friday boycott – and will it work?
While others scramble for deals on Black Friday and Cyber Monday, activists hope to leverage shopping behavior for societal change
www.theguardian.com
November 26, 2025 at 6:57 AM
Real power is being able to cut them off from their revenue stream.
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
SEATTLE TRAVELERS: Due to the Olympic Pipeline leak, all passengers traveling through SEA this week should check in with their airlines for updates to their flight.
Make sure to arrive at the airport early, and safe travels! www.seattletimes.com/business/ala...
Make sure to arrive at the airport early, and safe travels! www.seattletimes.com/business/ala...
Sea-Tac airlines turn to contingency plans as leak stops jet fuel flow
Washington declared an emergency after an Olympic Pipeline leak, but the airport’s operator and main airlines say flights are still running smoothly.
www.seattletimes.com
November 25, 2025 at 3:42 PM
SEATTLE TRAVELERS: Due to the Olympic Pipeline leak, all passengers traveling through SEA this week should check in with their airlines for updates to their flight.
Make sure to arrive at the airport early, and safe travels! www.seattletimes.com/business/ala...
Make sure to arrive at the airport early, and safe travels! www.seattletimes.com/business/ala...
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
Regardless of its response, ChatGPT actively deleting user input and its own output is a troubling function.
April 2, 2025 at 8:33 PM
Regardless of its response, ChatGPT actively deleting user input and its own output is a troubling function.
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
That too, but I'd guess that the main factor is the fact that Republicans (and foreign actors) have run AI bots for far longet to aggressively push the same narrative.
In reality DEI has lost its original meaning and it now means "unqualified".
The LLMs are picking that up.
In reality DEI has lost its original meaning and it now means "unqualified".
The LLMs are picking that up.
April 2, 2025 at 9:25 PM
That too, but I'd guess that the main factor is the fact that Republicans (and foreign actors) have run AI bots for far longet to aggressively push the same narrative.
In reality DEI has lost its original meaning and it now means "unqualified".
The LLMs are picking that up.
In reality DEI has lost its original meaning and it now means "unqualified".
The LLMs are picking that up.
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
Gemini too. It used DEI as a pejorative rather than a correction. I wonder if has to do with the fact that a bunch of well-meaning but thoughtless people have adopted it as an insult to mean "unqualified" when referring to the dipshits currently running our government.
April 2, 2025 at 9:05 PM
Gemini too. It used DEI as a pejorative rather than a correction. I wonder if has to do with the fact that a bunch of well-meaning but thoughtless people have adopted it as an insult to mean "unqualified" when referring to the dipshits currently running our government.
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
no human should ever accept a for-profit corporation deciding what “balanced input” means
April 2, 2025 at 7:55 PM
no human should ever accept a for-profit corporation deciding what “balanced input” means
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
That was my thought too. There is so much right wing garbage about “DEI hires” that it just takes everything in and then that becomes its basis. Dangerous times ahead.
April 2, 2025 at 7:17 PM
That was my thought too. There is so much right wing garbage about “DEI hires” that it just takes everything in and then that becomes its basis. Dangerous times ahead.
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
The "dei-hire" *slur,* it is used as a slur.
April 2, 2025 at 7:14 PM
The "dei-hire" *slur,* it is used as a slur.
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
What's most interesting here is the fact that ChatGPT has picked up the (fairly recent) over-use of the "DEI hire" phrase.
It shows how human language flows naturally into the LLMs as they absorb new content. Also, the importance of training on balanced inputs...
It shows how human language flows naturally into the LLMs as they absorb new content. Also, the importance of training on balanced inputs...
April 2, 2025 at 6:54 PM
What's most interesting here is the fact that ChatGPT has picked up the (fairly recent) over-use of the "DEI hire" phrase.
It shows how human language flows naturally into the LLMs as they absorb new content. Also, the importance of training on balanced inputs...
It shows how human language flows naturally into the LLMs as they absorb new content. Also, the importance of training on balanced inputs...
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
"I'm sorry you see it that way" is a peak nonapology. That's a learned behavioral model. I encourage you to reflect on that.
April 2, 2025 at 8:10 PM
"I'm sorry you see it that way" is a peak nonapology. That's a learned behavioral model. I encourage you to reflect on that.
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
Haha funny...
I'm absolutely not questioning that it happened.
I'm curious from a professional point of view as to why it happened.
To test any IT issue, you try to reproduce it. Same here.
As I wrote before, when the LLM changes the chat, it makes the process super difficult.
I'm absolutely not questioning that it happened.
I'm curious from a professional point of view as to why it happened.
To test any IT issue, you try to reproduce it. Same here.
As I wrote before, when the LLM changes the chat, it makes the process super difficult.
April 2, 2025 at 7:25 PM
Haha funny...
I'm absolutely not questioning that it happened.
I'm curious from a professional point of view as to why it happened.
To test any IT issue, you try to reproduce it. Same here.
As I wrote before, when the LLM changes the chat, it makes the process super difficult.
I'm absolutely not questioning that it happened.
I'm curious from a professional point of view as to why it happened.
To test any IT issue, you try to reproduce it. Same here.
As I wrote before, when the LLM changes the chat, it makes the process super difficult.
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
lol. “Let me recreate the experience of a black woman with a bot”
Is why we are in the mess we are in right now
Is why we are in the mess we are in right now
April 2, 2025 at 7:22 PM
lol. “Let me recreate the experience of a black woman with a bot”
Is why we are in the mess we are in right now
Is why we are in the mess we are in right now
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
"I'll see if I can reproduce it somehow" - it's only real if Mr AI Expert experiences it?
April 2, 2025 at 7:21 PM
"I'll see if I can reproduce it somehow" - it's only real if Mr AI Expert experiences it?
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
ChatGPT routinely updates answers as you refine the request. This is the way it most often works with coding. But it shouldn't remove the user input.
I'll see if I can reproduce it somehow.
My main point is that you can never use it to explain itself. It simply does not know what it did.
I'll see if I can reproduce it somehow.
My main point is that you can never use it to explain itself. It simply does not know what it did.
April 2, 2025 at 7:02 PM
ChatGPT routinely updates answers as you refine the request. This is the way it most often works with coding. But it shouldn't remove the user input.
I'll see if I can reproduce it somehow.
My main point is that you can never use it to explain itself. It simply does not know what it did.
I'll see if I can reproduce it somehow.
My main point is that you can never use it to explain itself. It simply does not know what it did.
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
That’s not my issue.
It took an *action* of deleting its output and my questioning of it.
It took an *action* of deleting its output and my questioning of it.
April 2, 2025 at 6:54 PM
That’s not my issue.
It took an *action* of deleting its output and my questioning of it.
It took an *action* of deleting its output and my questioning of it.
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
As a general rule, an LLM can't reflect reliably on its own process. Any explanations after the fact are generated in the same way as the original response.
You press for an answer. It responds like a human would answer - not reflecting on the actual process. So you end up with endless apologies.
You press for an answer. It responds like a human would answer - not reflecting on the actual process. So you end up with endless apologies.
April 2, 2025 at 6:52 PM
As a general rule, an LLM can't reflect reliably on its own process. Any explanations after the fact are generated in the same way as the original response.
You press for an answer. It responds like a human would answer - not reflecting on the actual process. So you end up with endless apologies.
You press for an answer. It responds like a human would answer - not reflecting on the actual process. So you end up with endless apologies.
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
And I didn’t put it in the thread.. this was my original input.
April 2, 2025 at 5:49 PM
And I didn’t put it in the thread.. this was my original input.
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
I guess I should write this up. There are serious problems with boundaries, consent and trust with these models.
Especially when it comes to race, sex, and gender.
Especially when it comes to race, sex, and gender.
April 2, 2025 at 3:48 PM
I guess I should write this up. There are serious problems with boundaries, consent and trust with these models.
Especially when it comes to race, sex, and gender.
Especially when it comes to race, sex, and gender.
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
I want to be very clear. Yes AI /LLM’s scrape data. Yes, garbage in, garbage out.
But this is the first time I’ve seen it actively delete content after I’ve expressed offense/anger, and then DELETE my expression of offense and anger.
And then lie/gaslight about it.
But this is the first time I’ve seen it actively delete content after I’ve expressed offense/anger, and then DELETE my expression of offense and anger.
And then lie/gaslight about it.
April 2, 2025 at 3:45 PM
I want to be very clear. Yes AI /LLM’s scrape data. Yes, garbage in, garbage out.
But this is the first time I’ve seen it actively delete content after I’ve expressed offense/anger, and then DELETE my expression of offense and anger.
And then lie/gaslight about it.
But this is the first time I’ve seen it actively delete content after I’ve expressed offense/anger, and then DELETE my expression of offense and anger.
And then lie/gaslight about it.
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
So here is what concerns me. Yes LLMs are text generators, we know, we know.
But text and output deletion?
To delete inputs or questions without consent and then to be programmed to *lie* and gaslight about it.. is… something.
Has anyone experienced this?
But text and output deletion?
To delete inputs or questions without consent and then to be programmed to *lie* and gaslight about it.. is… something.
Has anyone experienced this?
April 2, 2025 at 2:51 PM
So here is what concerns me. Yes LLMs are text generators, we know, we know.
But text and output deletion?
To delete inputs or questions without consent and then to be programmed to *lie* and gaslight about it.. is… something.
Has anyone experienced this?
But text and output deletion?
To delete inputs or questions without consent and then to be programmed to *lie* and gaslight about it.. is… something.
Has anyone experienced this?
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
ChatGPT erased my line expressing anger and incredulity at calling me a DEI hire, and then lied, claiming the system does that when a search command is triggered.
That’s just a lie.
It admits that it made a “judgement call to “soften the tone of the thread”. As if to protect me.
Wow.
That’s just a lie.
It admits that it made a “judgement call to “soften the tone of the thread”. As if to protect me.
Wow.
April 2, 2025 at 2:47 PM
ChatGPT erased my line expressing anger and incredulity at calling me a DEI hire, and then lied, claiming the system does that when a search command is triggered.
That’s just a lie.
It admits that it made a “judgement call to “soften the tone of the thread”. As if to protect me.
Wow.
That’s just a lie.
It admits that it made a “judgement call to “soften the tone of the thread”. As if to protect me.
Wow.
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
Me to ChatGPT: Why did you delete my line asking if you just called me a DEI hire??
ChatGPT: I didn’t mean to. The WebTool made me do it. I love you, you’re great.
ChatGPT: I didn’t mean to. The WebTool made me do it. I love you, you’re great.
April 2, 2025 at 2:42 PM
Me to ChatGPT: Why did you delete my line asking if you just called me a DEI hire??
ChatGPT: I didn’t mean to. The WebTool made me do it. I love you, you’re great.
ChatGPT: I didn’t mean to. The WebTool made me do it. I love you, you’re great.
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
I told ChatGPT that I wanted to be a philosopher as a kid.
And then it said that I was a DEI hire?!?!!??
God, we are fucked.
And then it said that I was a DEI hire?!?!!??
God, we are fucked.
April 2, 2025 at 2:31 PM
I told ChatGPT that I wanted to be a philosopher as a kid.
And then it said that I was a DEI hire?!?!!??
God, we are fucked.
And then it said that I was a DEI hire?!?!!??
God, we are fucked.
Reposted by HannibabbleAlphaB
Since 2008, biologist Juan Valero has warned about the risk of overfishing a halibut population that was already in decline.
This year, the halibut harvest hit its lowest point in more than a century.
Story by Hal Bernton & @lorenholmes.bsky.social for @adn.com.
🐟 bit.ly/4px9OR5
This year, the halibut harvest hit its lowest point in more than a century.
Story by Hal Bernton & @lorenholmes.bsky.social for @adn.com.
🐟 bit.ly/4px9OR5
November 26, 2025 at 12:31 AM
Since 2008, biologist Juan Valero has warned about the risk of overfishing a halibut population that was already in decline.
This year, the halibut harvest hit its lowest point in more than a century.
Story by Hal Bernton & @lorenholmes.bsky.social for @adn.com.
🐟 bit.ly/4px9OR5
This year, the halibut harvest hit its lowest point in more than a century.
Story by Hal Bernton & @lorenholmes.bsky.social for @adn.com.
🐟 bit.ly/4px9OR5