Ikke for noen, spør du meg

«this tech would dovetail perfectly with the ways of the world. Treating crisis at the level of symptom, propping up domination by force, refusing to abide by limits, advancing instrumental rationality even further – all is part of the routine protocol.»

Tenker de som utvikler og drømmer om selvkjørende biler har tenkt lenge på disse spørsmålene. For å ikke snakke om utvikling og bruk autonome våpen (som jeg leste i MB i dag ble brukt offisielt første gang av Ukraina i september)

I agree with @doctorvive.bsky.social

"The fossil-fuel industry and the governments that support it are literally colluding to stop you from creating a world that runs on safe energy. They are trying to maintain the fossil-fuel economy... We are against them, and we are going to fight for dear life"

Mange tenker nok at bankene fortjener disse overskuddene de får når de leker med dine og mine sparepenger. Helt til man innser at stort sett alle pengene de leker seg til milliarder med, har de skapt ut av tynn luft under godkjenning fra norges bank, der små renteforskjeller fort blir milliarder.

9/ This is reckless climate and economic policy. And magical thinking. Net zero doesn’t happen without reducing fossil fuel supply. At least the US has the cojones to say it doesn’t give a shit about climate. @mark-carney.bsky.social is still pretending that Canada does. FIN

Again, I know. Not always need for conciousness for logical decisions. A logical test on whether or not a reference is existing or not, should be easy. But then what?