Jingle Ggobs
banner
ggobs.bsky.social
Jingle Ggobs
@ggobs.bsky.social
STMS Educator
linktr.ee/ggobs
Thanks. I was mixing "employment numbers" and "unemployment numbers".
December 19, 2025 at 10:41 PM
Reposted by Jingle Ggobs
Imagine how boring it would be to live in a city with normal sports teams
December 16, 2025 at 2:28 AM
Very
December 19, 2025 at 4:39 AM
VERY
December 19, 2025 at 4:38 AM
Or was close to being US territory.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Ne...
1948 Newfoundland referendums - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
December 18, 2025 at 6:31 AM
It's a single step. Delegitimize the administration, establish a counterinsurgency.
December 18, 2025 at 6:23 AM
What I don't know is if we currently ask "how hard are you looking?" (how many postings did you apply to or asking employers how many people applied and how many of those were serious canidates and would we with a universal benefits.
December 18, 2025 at 5:37 AM
Current unemployment % is just looking at payroll numbers and surveying peeps and asking "are you employed, are you looking for work?"
December 18, 2025 at 5:34 AM
Depends on what you mean by "full employment". Plenty of people have jobs just for the health insurance. With UHC those people wouldn't be working, would they be included in the unemployment numbers? A UBI might decrease the numbers working (or actually increase its kind of muddled), would they?
December 18, 2025 at 5:34 AM
Reposted by Jingle Ggobs
100%. For example, what if voters aren’t asking for a line graph showing retail theft going down, but to not see any context-free, undated mass shoplifting videos in their feeds? Good luck with that if our palantíri algo overlords don’t wish it.
December 18, 2025 at 3:37 AM
I'm seeing this at the Middle School and High School levels.
December 16, 2025 at 2:02 PM