FxChiP
banner
fxchip.net
FxChiP
@fxchip.net
Reposted by FxChiP
Reminder that JK Rowling sees any support of Harry Potter as an endorsement of her political beliefs, and she uses Harry Potter royalties to further her transphobic hate campaign. Your friends and family might not think you're a bigot for buying Harry Potter shit, but Rowling herself certainly will.
December 12, 2025 at 5:56 AM
this is the one time in my life where "if it's for free, it's for me" simply did not apply
December 12, 2025 at 5:35 AM
fantastic
December 12, 2025 at 1:31 AM
OH TO BE AN EGG IN YOUR HANDS~

(/j)
December 11, 2025 at 2:35 PM
This ACCU article by Andy Balaam is also well-cited, providing even more articles than I linked here and several sections on his reasons for not using LLMs.

accu.org/journals/ove...
Why I Don’t Use AI
Many people are embracing GenAI. Andy Balaam encourages us to pause and think about why this might not be a good idea.
accu.org
December 11, 2025 at 2:22 PM
There's a broader point here that part of the entire impetus behind genAI implementation and adoption is to make large portions of the workforce "redundant" -- i.e. lay off a bunch of people to save labor cost, with no clear place for the labor to go.
AI warnings are the hip new way for CEOs to keep their workers afraid of losing their jobs | CNN Business
Every few weeks, the Earth cries out for an AI scare on a frequency heard only by tech CEOs. And lo, like a rain cloud over a parched valley, here comes Amazon boss Andy Jassy to shower us with fresh ...
web.archive.org
December 10, 2025 at 12:38 AM
“Problem was, the corrected brief still contained at least 6 other AI-generated errors. In their declarations, the attorneys confessed that about 9 of the 27 legal citations in their 10-page brief were incorrect in some way, including 2 completely non-existent cases”

www.lawnext.com/2025/05/ai-h...
AI Hallucinations Strike Again: Two More Cases Where Lawyers Face Judicial Wrath for Fake Citations
In what has become a distressingly familiar pattern in courtrooms across America, two more cases have emerged of lawyers submitting briefs containing non-existent legal citations generated by AI tools...
www.lawnext.com
December 10, 2025 at 12:29 AM
I _hate_ that this one has AI preview art
December 10, 2025 at 12:28 AM
I *do* continually update this as I see new things as well
December 8, 2025 at 2:24 PM
Linking my own as well

bsky.app/profile/fxch...
Off the top of my head, there are a few major *categories* for this:

1. Intellectual property/sourcing ethics
2. Ecological impact
3. Economic impact
4. Impacts on mental health & cognition
5. Problems with output (incl. open source)

I'm going to start a thread apiece for each category w/ sources
December 8, 2025 at 2:23 PM
GOOD LUCK, YOU GOT THIS
December 8, 2025 at 2:21 PM
*damn*, congrats
December 7, 2025 at 2:47 AM
Note: the judge cited an essay from The Verge; original at www.theverge.com/ai-artificia... / permalink at perma.cc/7EHD-PLLZ
The AI boom is based on a fundamental mistake
article
perma.cc
December 4, 2025 at 2:27 PM
A judge ruled that while a human defendant without AI assistance may get away with citing a case if they can reason a way that the case fits even when it might not on its face, genAI output cannot because it does not *reason*/"perform the metacognitive processes"

law.justia.com/cases/federa...
Jarrus et al v. Governor of Michigan et al, No. 4:2025cv11168 - Document 176 (E.D. Mich. 2025)
Jarrus et al v. Governor of Michigan et al, No. 4:2025cv11168 - Document 176 (E.D. Mich. 2025) case opinion from the Eastern District of Michigan U.S. Federal District Court
law.justia.com
December 4, 2025 at 2:27 PM
thank you for finding this, literally nobody is actually citing anything
December 4, 2025 at 2:24 PM
I'm kind of keeping a running tab on problems with AI by category and linked your post here: bsky.app/profile/fxch...

let me know if that's okay -- if not I can remove it immediately 😄
Something to say about AI is that I’ve often seen my (non-technical) coworkers use it and I have to point out mistakes they didn’t notice.

Thing is, when you use it to write something you might not understand, you’re not gonna know when something’s wrong.

I don’t mean this in a condescending way.
December 4, 2025 at 2:16 PM
Something to say about AI is that I’ve often seen my (non-technical) coworkers use it and I have to point out mistakes they didn’t notice.

Thing is, when you use it to write something you might not understand, you’re not gonna know when something’s wrong.

I don’t mean this in a condescending way.
December 4, 2025 at 2:14 PM
I mean, not trying to blow smoke, but this is like production animation quality minus the color, on a page rather than a screen (well, on a screen to, but by proxy, and even then!!)
December 2, 2025 at 9:08 PM