François Diaz-Maurin
@francoisdm.bsky.social
Nuclear editor @thebulletin.org. Fmr MacArthur Found. & Marie S.-Curie fellow @stanfordcisac.bsky.social. Fmr engineer in US/French nuclear ind. 1st gen. Father x3. Kyokushin. Cello. Autism. | Tips: [email protected] signal: francoisdm.21
Reposted by François Diaz-Maurin
It would seem good news that Germany doesn't want the Bomb. Why do academics and think tankers of various stripes keep suggesting otherwise?
Germany hasn't had a nuclear weapons program since 1945 and nobody in Berlin is asking for a German Bomb. So why do so many scholars and analyst suggest otherwise? My @thebulletin.org article argues why Berlin will not, and should not, develop its own nuclear arsenal
thebulletin.org/2025/11/no-g...
thebulletin.org/2025/11/no-g...
No, Germany is not getting the Bomb. Why should it?
Germany hasn't had an indigenous nuclear weapons program since 1945, and nobody in Berlin is asking for a German bomb. So why so many in the United States suggest otherwise?
thebulletin.org
November 26, 2025 at 11:16 PM
It would seem good news that Germany doesn't want the Bomb. Why do academics and think tankers of various stripes keep suggesting otherwise?
Reposted by François Diaz-Maurin
Germany hasn't had a nuclear weapons program since 1945 and nobody in Berlin is asking for a German Bomb. So why do so many scholars and analyst suggest otherwise? My @thebulletin.org article argues why Berlin will not, and should not, develop its own nuclear arsenal
thebulletin.org/2025/11/no-g...
thebulletin.org/2025/11/no-g...
No, Germany is not getting the Bomb. Why should it?
Germany hasn't had an indigenous nuclear weapons program since 1945, and nobody in Berlin is asking for a German bomb. So why so many in the United States suggest otherwise?
thebulletin.org
November 26, 2025 at 6:37 PM
Germany hasn't had a nuclear weapons program since 1945 and nobody in Berlin is asking for a German Bomb. So why do so many scholars and analyst suggest otherwise? My @thebulletin.org article argues why Berlin will not, and should not, develop its own nuclear arsenal
thebulletin.org/2025/11/no-g...
thebulletin.org/2025/11/no-g...
Reposted by François Diaz-Maurin
Germany hasn't had its own nuclear weapons program since 1945, and nobody in Berlin is asking for a German bomb.
So why do so many in the United States suggest otherwise?
Read more from @philipprombach.bsky.social. ⬇️
So why do so many in the United States suggest otherwise?
Read more from @philipprombach.bsky.social. ⬇️
No, Germany is not getting the Bomb. Why should it?
Germany hasn't had an indigenous nuclear weapons program since 1945, and nobody in Berlin is asking for a German bomb. So why so many in the United States suggest otherwise?
thebulletin.org
November 26, 2025 at 3:12 PM
Germany hasn't had its own nuclear weapons program since 1945, and nobody in Berlin is asking for a German bomb.
So why do so many in the United States suggest otherwise?
Read more from @philipprombach.bsky.social. ⬇️
So why do so many in the United States suggest otherwise?
Read more from @philipprombach.bsky.social. ⬇️
Reposted by François Diaz-Maurin
🚨 JUST IN: Germany hasn't had an indigenous nuclear weapons program since 1945, and nobody in Berlin is asking for a German bomb. So why so many in the United States suggest otherwise?
Philipp Rombach (@philipprombach.bsky.social) in @thebulletin.org
#Germany #nuclearweapons #nukesky
Philipp Rombach (@philipprombach.bsky.social) in @thebulletin.org
#Germany #nuclearweapons #nukesky
No, Germany is not getting the Bomb. Why should it?
Germany hasn't had an indigenous nuclear weapons program since 1945, and nobody in Berlin is asking for a German bomb. So why so many in the United States suggest otherwise?
thebulletin.org
November 26, 2025 at 12:35 PM
🚨 JUST IN: Germany hasn't had an indigenous nuclear weapons program since 1945, and nobody in Berlin is asking for a German bomb. So why so many in the United States suggest otherwise?
Philipp Rombach (@philipprombach.bsky.social) in @thebulletin.org
#Germany #nuclearweapons #nukesky
Philipp Rombach (@philipprombach.bsky.social) in @thebulletin.org
#Germany #nuclearweapons #nukesky
Reposted by François Diaz-Maurin
In which Philipp Rombach (@philipprombach.bsky.social) responds to Moritz S. Graefrath (@moritz-graefrath.com) and Mark Raymond (@profmarkraymond.bsky.social)'s recent piece in @foreignaffairs.com
🚨 JUST IN: Germany hasn't had an indigenous nuclear weapons program since 1945, and nobody in Berlin is asking for a German bomb. So why so many in the United States suggest otherwise?
Philipp Rombach (@philipprombach.bsky.social) in @thebulletin.org
#Germany #nuclearweapons #nukesky
Philipp Rombach (@philipprombach.bsky.social) in @thebulletin.org
#Germany #nuclearweapons #nukesky
No, Germany is not getting the Bomb. Why should it?
Germany hasn't had an indigenous nuclear weapons program since 1945, and nobody in Berlin is asking for a German bomb. So why so many in the United States suggest otherwise?
thebulletin.org
November 26, 2025 at 12:37 PM
In which Philipp Rombach (@philipprombach.bsky.social) responds to Moritz S. Graefrath (@moritz-graefrath.com) and Mark Raymond (@profmarkraymond.bsky.social)'s recent piece in @foreignaffairs.com
Reposted by François Diaz-Maurin
After the recent US-Saudi Investment Summit, the White House heralded $1 trillion in business deals. But the deals raise questions about protection of sensitive data, control of technology, and Saudi Arabia's desire for a domestic uranium enrichment program, writes Rachel Bronson @rb312.bsky.social.
The pomp, circumstance, benefits, and costs of the trillion-dollar US-Saudi Investment Summit
After the recent US-Saudi Investment Summit, the White House heralded $1 trillion in business deals that give the US tech sector a central role. But the deals also carry an array of potential risks,…
thebulletin.org
November 26, 2025 at 5:32 PM
After the recent US-Saudi Investment Summit, the White House heralded $1 trillion in business deals. But the deals raise questions about protection of sensitive data, control of technology, and Saudi Arabia's desire for a domestic uranium enrichment program, writes Rachel Bronson @rb312.bsky.social.
"You will be visited by three spirits"
The three spirits:
The three spirits:
November 26, 2025 at 3:32 PM
"You will be visited by three spirits"
The three spirits:
The three spirits:
In which Philipp Rombach (@philipprombach.bsky.social) responds to Moritz S. Graefrath (@moritz-graefrath.com) and Mark Raymond (@profmarkraymond.bsky.social)'s recent piece in @foreignaffairs.com
🚨 JUST IN: Germany hasn't had an indigenous nuclear weapons program since 1945, and nobody in Berlin is asking for a German bomb. So why so many in the United States suggest otherwise?
Philipp Rombach (@philipprombach.bsky.social) in @thebulletin.org
#Germany #nuclearweapons #nukesky
Philipp Rombach (@philipprombach.bsky.social) in @thebulletin.org
#Germany #nuclearweapons #nukesky
No, Germany is not getting the Bomb. Why should it?
Germany hasn't had an indigenous nuclear weapons program since 1945, and nobody in Berlin is asking for a German bomb. So why so many in the United States suggest otherwise?
thebulletin.org
November 26, 2025 at 12:37 PM
In which Philipp Rombach (@philipprombach.bsky.social) responds to Moritz S. Graefrath (@moritz-graefrath.com) and Mark Raymond (@profmarkraymond.bsky.social)'s recent piece in @foreignaffairs.com
🚨 JUST IN: Germany hasn't had an indigenous nuclear weapons program since 1945, and nobody in Berlin is asking for a German bomb. So why so many in the United States suggest otherwise?
Philipp Rombach (@philipprombach.bsky.social) in @thebulletin.org
#Germany #nuclearweapons #nukesky
Philipp Rombach (@philipprombach.bsky.social) in @thebulletin.org
#Germany #nuclearweapons #nukesky
No, Germany is not getting the Bomb. Why should it?
Germany hasn't had an indigenous nuclear weapons program since 1945, and nobody in Berlin is asking for a German bomb. So why so many in the United States suggest otherwise?
thebulletin.org
November 26, 2025 at 12:35 PM
🚨 JUST IN: Germany hasn't had an indigenous nuclear weapons program since 1945, and nobody in Berlin is asking for a German bomb. So why so many in the United States suggest otherwise?
Philipp Rombach (@philipprombach.bsky.social) in @thebulletin.org
#Germany #nuclearweapons #nukesky
Philipp Rombach (@philipprombach.bsky.social) in @thebulletin.org
#Germany #nuclearweapons #nukesky
After the recent US-Saudi Investment Summit, the White House heralded $1 trillion in business deals that give the US tech sector a central role. But the deals also carry an array of potential risks, Rachel Bronson (@rb312.bsky.social) writes in @thebulletin.org
#proliferation #Trump #nukesky
#proliferation #Trump #nukesky
The pomp, circumstance, benefits, and costs of the trillion-dollar US-Saudi Investment Summit
After the recent US-Saudi Investment Summit, the White House heralded $1 trillion in business deals that give the US tech sector a central role. But the deals also carry an array of potential risks, r...
thebulletin.org
November 26, 2025 at 11:22 AM
After the recent US-Saudi Investment Summit, the White House heralded $1 trillion in business deals that give the US tech sector a central role. But the deals also carry an array of potential risks, Rachel Bronson (@rb312.bsky.social) writes in @thebulletin.org
#proliferation #Trump #nukesky
#proliferation #Trump #nukesky
Reposted by François Diaz-Maurin
NASA and the European Space Agency plan to bring samples back from Mars. Could they harbor a type of life that scientists warn could trigger mass extinctions on Earth?
Read more from NASA mathematician Bill Taber. ⬇️
Read more from NASA mathematician Bill Taber. ⬇️
Black swans from the red planet—Could NASA bring back “mirror life” from Mars?
NASA and the European Space Agency plan to bring samples back from Mars. Could they harbor a type of life that scientists warn could trigger mass extinctions on Earth?
thebulletin.org
November 24, 2025 at 3:12 PM
NASA and the European Space Agency plan to bring samples back from Mars. Could they harbor a type of life that scientists warn could trigger mass extinctions on Earth?
Read more from NASA mathematician Bill Taber. ⬇️
Read more from NASA mathematician Bill Taber. ⬇️
Reposted by François Diaz-Maurin
This look at COP30 quotes Matthew Huber's Bulletin piece on what would happen if Earth became too hot for animals.
"In the United States, just 3 degrees Celsius of warming conditions in simulations tend to be hotter—when humidity is factored in—than heat waves in North Africa today."
"In the United States, just 3 degrees Celsius of warming conditions in simulations tend to be hotter—when humidity is factored in—than heat waves in North Africa today."
November 24, 2025 at 10:15 PM
This look at COP30 quotes Matthew Huber's Bulletin piece on what would happen if Earth became too hot for animals.
"In the United States, just 3 degrees Celsius of warming conditions in simulations tend to be hotter—when humidity is factored in—than heat waves in North Africa today."
"In the United States, just 3 degrees Celsius of warming conditions in simulations tend to be hotter—when humidity is factored in—than heat waves in North Africa today."
Seriously.
November 24, 2025 at 9:35 PM
Seriously.
Reposted by François Diaz-Maurin
"Restoring a broadly held value in institutional truth and information accuracy should be the long-term vision. But until that time, the public and their leaders must learn the skills and tools necessary to shore up our resilience against forces that fuel chaos and disorder." — @andrewfacini.com
Post-truth disasters: We're not ready for nuclear war on social media
"Diminishing the practical capacity of the government and the reputational credibility of institutions responsible for rapid response can only evaporate trust and lead to citizens looking to alternative sources for critical information, even without the distortions present on social media platforms.
Unfortunately, this dangerous dynamic is only worsening as platforms feed users an ever-increasing amount of content generated by artificial intelligence services."
thebulletin.org
November 23, 2025 at 5:12 PM
"Restoring a broadly held value in institutional truth and information accuracy should be the long-term vision. But until that time, the public and their leaders must learn the skills and tools necessary to shore up our resilience against forces that fuel chaos and disorder." — @andrewfacini.com
I am sorry to report that "six seven" has crossed the Atlantic Ocean.
November 24, 2025 at 9:32 PM
I am sorry to report that "six seven" has crossed the Atlantic Ocean.
Certes, mais un an c'est peu pour tenter une expérience d'expatriation. Et aussi Dénia est une cité balnéaire et donc très touristique. L'expérience aurait sans doute été tout autre en s'installant dans une commune plus éloignée de la côte et en se donnant plus de temps pour s'installer.
November 21, 2025 at 5:46 PM
Certes, mais un an c'est peu pour tenter une expérience d'expatriation. Et aussi Dénia est une cité balnéaire et donc très touristique. L'expérience aurait sans doute été tout autre en s'installant dans une commune plus éloignée de la côte et en se donnant plus de temps pour s'installer.
Reposted by François Diaz-Maurin
Had the pleasure of interviewing David Obst—lit agent for Bob Woodward & Carl Bernstein, Daniel Ellsberg & promoter of Seymour Hersh—about his new book: Saving Ourselves From Big Car
Even as someone steeped in anti-car discourse, I don't feel like I see many people frame it as an existential threat
Even as someone steeped in anti-car discourse, I don't feel like I see many people frame it as an existential threat
How 'Big Car' poses an existential threat to humanity
While Big Car kills many of us quickly, in deadly collisions, it is killing many more of us slowly, by polluting the environment, warming the Earth, sowing misinformation and doubt about climate scien...
thebulletin.org
November 21, 2025 at 3:41 PM
Had the pleasure of interviewing David Obst—lit agent for Bob Woodward & Carl Bernstein, Daniel Ellsberg & promoter of Seymour Hersh—about his new book: Saving Ourselves From Big Car
Even as someone steeped in anti-car discourse, I don't feel like I see many people frame it as an existential threat
Even as someone steeped in anti-car discourse, I don't feel like I see many people frame it as an existential threat
Reposted by François Diaz-Maurin
Holtec built an empire around mothballed nuclear power plants and incomplete nuclear initiatives. The firm's history of overpromising and under-delivery raises a question: Is this who we should trust with the future of #nuclear energy?
thebulletin.org/2025/11/how-...
thebulletin.org/2025/11/how-...
How Holtec International became an expanding (and controversial) nuclear power
The firm's history of overpromising and underdelivery raises a question: Is this who we should trust with the future of nuclear energy?
thebulletin.org
November 21, 2025 at 10:10 AM
Holtec built an empire around mothballed nuclear power plants and incomplete nuclear initiatives. The firm's history of overpromising and under-delivery raises a question: Is this who we should trust with the future of #nuclear energy?
thebulletin.org/2025/11/how-...
thebulletin.org/2025/11/how-...
Reposted by François Diaz-Maurin
Risks of a serious crisis are rising. But for disaster response, the information environment has never been worse, writes @andrewfacini.com of @councilonstrategicrisks.org.
Post-truth disasters: We're not ready for nuclear war on social media
"Diminishing the practical capacity of the government and the reputational credibility of institutions responsible for rapid response can only evaporate trust and lead to citizens looking to alternative sources for critical information, even without the distortions present on social media platforms.
Unfortunately, this dangerous dynamic is only worsening as platforms feed users an ever-increasing amount of content generated by artificial intelligence services."
thebulletin.org
November 19, 2025 at 2:48 PM
Risks of a serious crisis are rising. But for disaster response, the information environment has never been worse, writes @andrewfacini.com of @councilonstrategicrisks.org.
Nice piece. Moreover, in a high intensity and multimodal conflict, military officers would have no alternative dataset free from AI input to base their decision on because the pace of conventional data gathering and interpretation is no match.
Good piece from @joshuakeating.bsky.social:
"A rogue AI killing us all is, for now at least, a far-fetched fear; a human consulting an AI on pressing the button is the scenario that should keep us up at night." www.vox.com/politics/468...
"A rogue AI killing us all is, for now at least, a far-fetched fear; a human consulting an AI on pressing the button is the scenario that should keep us up at night." www.vox.com/politics/468...
When it comes to nukes and AI, people are worried about the wrong thing
It’s more subtle than Skynet.
www.vox.com
November 20, 2025 at 8:40 PM
Nice piece. Moreover, in a high intensity and multimodal conflict, military officers would have no alternative dataset free from AI input to base their decision on because the pace of conventional data gathering and interpretation is no match.
Reposted by François Diaz-Maurin
From Camden to Chernobyl, Holtec International's track record raises a question: can the firm be trusted with the future of nuclear energy?
A new Bulletin investigation by journalist Matt Smith. ⬇️
A new Bulletin investigation by journalist Matt Smith. ⬇️
How Holtec International became an expanding (and controversial) nuclear power
Holtec now controls the fate of multiple nuclear power plants across the United States—and "plans to go public in a planned stock offering that Singh told Barron’s could value his company at $10 billion."
thebulletin.org
November 20, 2025 at 4:38 PM
From Camden to Chernobyl, Holtec International's track record raises a question: can the firm be trusted with the future of nuclear energy?
A new Bulletin investigation by journalist Matt Smith. ⬇️
A new Bulletin investigation by journalist Matt Smith. ⬇️
Reposted by François Diaz-Maurin
Another thread from the TNW work I really wanted to pull on was the impact is the info environment: it turns out that how we process and prosecute crises is really important in the response to a tactical use scenario, and oops the info environment is unbelievably toxic today!
Risks of a serious crisis are rising. But for disaster response, the information environment has never been worse, writes @andrewfacini.com of @councilonstrategicrisks.org.
Post-truth disasters: We're not ready for nuclear war on social media
"Diminishing the practical capacity of the government and the reputational credibility of institutions responsible for rapid response can only evaporate trust and lead to citizens looking to alternative sources for critical information, even without the distortions present on social media platforms.
Unfortunately, this dangerous dynamic is only worsening as platforms feed users an ever-increasing amount of content generated by artificial intelligence services."
thebulletin.org
November 20, 2025 at 4:56 PM
Another thread from the TNW work I really wanted to pull on was the impact is the info environment: it turns out that how we process and prosecute crises is really important in the response to a tactical use scenario, and oops the info environment is unbelievably toxic today!
Reposted by François Diaz-Maurin
This story—based on months of research by a top investigative reporter—should be read by everyone interested in the nuclear industry, pro or con. thebulletin.org/2025/11/how-...
How Holtec International became an expanding (and controversial) nuclear power
The firm's history of overpromising and underdelivery raises a question: Is this who we should trust with the future of nuclear energy?
thebulletin.org
November 20, 2025 at 3:54 PM
This story—based on months of research by a top investigative reporter—should be read by everyone interested in the nuclear industry, pro or con. thebulletin.org/2025/11/how-...
This story—based on months of research by a top investigative reporter—should be read by everyone interested in the nuclear industry, pro or con. thebulletin.org/2025/11/how-...
How Holtec International became an expanding (and controversial) nuclear power
The firm's history of overpromising and underdelivery raises a question: Is this who we should trust with the future of nuclear energy?
thebulletin.org
November 20, 2025 at 4:32 PM