Find Malvika tomorrow at 10:00 in h3242 (BOF - TRackB) to discuss more about this.

There are 4 categories of the "Do Not Harm" Framework:

Do not harm means taking a step back to consider if the work that you are doing can possibly be significantly harming a community or an individual.

Looking at literature, Malvika discovered Do Not Harm is actually compatible with open models, but there are some known harms of #data and #tech:

Malvika stumbled upon the Do Not Harm project a few years ago and was suprised to see that there were no direct links to #opensource and #openscience.

www.urban.org/projects/do-...

Here are some of the questions that shaped the Parsl processes:

The path to sustainability also involves reducing technical debt and making the code simpler, so it is just easier to maintain.

But now, what about sustainability of such a project? Currently resources are mainly coming from grants, external funding from projects that depend on Parsl, and volunteer in kind efforts.

Parsl was released in 2020 as v1, and it is now releasing weekly, although those releases are mostly maintenance rather than adding new features.

Daniel is going to look into the Parsl project
parsl-project.org

Parsl is used by individual researchers and larger consortia in many different domains as astrophysics, biology, and any academic field that has to deal with large volumes of data.

With an open and community-driven approach, Wikirate assesses Modern Slavery statements. The assessment considers whether companies are releasing statements that really meet the legal requirements, but also if they detail policies and actions that go beyond compliance. The short answer is: NO.

As modern slavery still persists in the supply chain of a lot of the stuff we use everyday, what can we do? One way to tackle this is ensuring supply chain #transparency.