Frédéric Grosshans
fgrosshans.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy
Frédéric Grosshans
@fgrosshans.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy
A French researcher in quantum information, expressing his own views.
A few old toots at https://qubit-social.xyz/@fgrosshans

[bridged from https://mathstodon.xyz/@fgrosshans on the fediverse by https://fed.brid.gy/ ]
@MarCandea MDPI, c'est aussi ceux qui ont fait pression sur l'université employant John Beall pour qu'il arrête de publier une liste des revues prédatrices. Pour moi, ce procédé est à lui seul suffisant pour exclure MDPI de la communauté académique
November 11, 2025 at 4:23 PM
Reposted by Frédéric Grosshans
wait! I've just remembered https://tilingsearch.mit.edu/ exists!
A Tiling Database
tilingsearch.mit.edu
November 11, 2025 at 12:51 PM
@hannorein @zyrxvo I guess the correct paper is rather https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04583
A substellar flyby that shaped the orbits of the giant planets
The modestly eccentric and non-coplanar orbits of the giant planets pose a challenge to solar system formation theories which generally indicate that the giant planets emerged from the protoplanetary disk in nearly perfectly circular and coplanar orbits. We demonstrate that a single encounter with a 2-50 Jupiter-mass object, passing through the solar system at a perihelion distance less than 20 AU and a hyperbolic excess velocity of 1-3 km/s, can excite the giant planets' eccentricities and mutual inclinations to values comparable to those observed. We describe a metric to evaluate how closely a simulated flyby system matches the eccentricity and inclination secular modes of the solar system. We estimate that there is about a 1-in-9000 chance that such a flyby occurs during the solar system's residence in its primordial cluster and produces a dynamical architecture similar to that of the solar system. The scenario of an ancient close encounter with a substellar object offers a plausible explanation for the origin of the moderate eccentricities and inclinations and the secular architecture of the planets. We discuss some broader implications of disruptive flyby encounters on planetary systems in the Galaxy.
arxiv.org
November 10, 2025 at 4:35 PM
@darkuncle @xgranade The key problem of annealers is that they are NOT known to be universal, and no one managed to prove universality of adiabatic quantum computers (their theoretical idealised model) when T≠0 despite decades of trial. Interestingly, however, annealers have been quite hard to […]
Original post on mathstodon.xyz
mathstodon.xyz
August 24, 2025 at 10:20 PM
Reposted by Frédéric Grosshans
What you won't see, possibly *ever*, is any quantum advantage in highly unstructured problems on giant data sets. That's not to say QC won't ever be useful anywhere in ML, but not in the end-to-end Big Data sense of things.

There's a lot of known no-go theorems in quantum machine learning, and […]
Original post on wandering.shop
wandering.shop
August 24, 2025 at 9:30 PM
Reposted by Frédéric Grosshans
Anyway, QC hype isn't inevitable, you don't need to burn yourself out going and learning everything about quantum computing RIGHT NOW because some failed AI snake oil salesfolk tried to pivot.

But knowing a *little* bit can help you read through the hype and understand *why* so much popular […]
Original post on wandering.shop
wandering.shop
August 24, 2025 at 9:38 PM
@xgranade Isn't the whole point of the thing precisely to avoid any specific skill? «You don't need to learn to program/draw/know history/etc.: just speak to our SnakeOilGPT ant it will give you an answer is a few seconds?»
May 10, 2025 at 9:42 PM