At least you've voted against most of his cabinet nominees, but Dems need to block everything. Hell, no one on our side is willing to go even halfway as far as Tuberville did, with a hell of a lot more on the table.

I was going to ask how they defined "a little mean" and "saying no to women" but figured I'd be even more disappointed if I found out. Somehow, more and less bad than I expected in different ways.

That's infinitely more minority speakers than I would have expected.

Is it really "post-grad years" if you drop out a year in?

*** Are you a white man who had his feelings hurt by the existence of minorities? Get the new Trump Bank Alpha Male Gold Mastercard! From Barron Trump in collaboration with Andrew Tate. ***

Feels like Trump got told no, so he's changing the rules. Now he can hurt women and profit at the same time!

Here is the official rule proposal with a direct link to comment electronically, TODAY ONLY, Dec. 15.

In commenting it's very useful to REQUEST A PUBLIC HEARING on the proposal, which can add time for further consideration.

www.federalregister.gov/documents/20...

I too just sputtered, loudly enough I got a look from the guy two seats down at this bar.

Except for Broccoli, who used it for an unhealthy relationship with computer Troi.

Which other social media site would you describe as one of the juggernauts?

So our country is overridden with immigrants at 13 million, but letting 50 million buy their way in is fine. So long as the king gets his tribute, I guess.

I kind of want to make an extension that will do this for me, but I know that years down the road, I'd get really confused reading something about deer fool.

Careful, this admin is likely to claim that this is libel, and go after Bluesky for it once you get rid of 47 U.S.C. Section 230.

I literally said "god dammit, Terry!" aloud as I read it just now.

I'm surprised they haven't used any other point for administration. Is there no other place they could place the IV that wouldn't lead to all this speculation? I assume it would be more of a hassle, but they wouldn't need to spew such blatant nonsense trying to explain it.

Yes, the current administration would ruin publicly funded healthcare, but they're doing that anyway. At least then we'd be screwed without the insurance companies in the cuck chair.

I'm glad you've done something to help with prescriptions for people, but you have no clue for a lot of this.

Most of us can't just pay to skip past our primary care to a specialist. Hell, how many people even have a PCP, or can afford to go see them even if they need a specialist?

The "biggest, expensive hospital chains" already only serve the rich. Because they're expensive.

wishing all the democrats who did this a very [THIS USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST]

I'm not sure if I'm more disappointed in the 23 that voted yes, or those that voted present. At least the 23 have the conviction to vote, even though I hope this bites every one of them in primaries.

Jeffries announcing Dems will be voting present and then getting this result looks so bad on him.