EIL
@emipsaloquitur.bsky.social
(she/her) Lawyer. Cereal connoisseur. Not verified but my cats will vouch for me.
Reposted by EIL
I know I keep harping on this point, but it’s just such an obviously fixable own-goal.
Just say “Elon Musk” instead of “the South African billionaire.” 🤦
The middle sentences in this paragraph are pretty good. But the reader has to trudge to reach them.
Just say “Elon Musk” instead of “the South African billionaire.” 🤦
The middle sentences in this paragraph are pretty good. But the reader has to trudge to reach them.
December 10, 2025 at 2:05 PM
I know I keep harping on this point, but it’s just such an obviously fixable own-goal.
Just say “Elon Musk” instead of “the South African billionaire.” 🤦
The middle sentences in this paragraph are pretty good. But the reader has to trudge to reach them.
Just say “Elon Musk” instead of “the South African billionaire.” 🤦
The middle sentences in this paragraph are pretty good. But the reader has to trudge to reach them.
Reposted by EIL
(boosting this since it makes GOP-majority motions panels even less remarkable)
Ironically, he is doing something to make the probability of a GOP-majority motions panel more likely: The chief judge can opt out of motion panel service, which he has done. That makes the pool for motions panels 6D-4R.
December 9, 2025 at 8:37 PM
(boosting this since it makes GOP-majority motions panels even less remarkable)
Reposted by EIL
I'm convinced that these yahoos are so obsessed with simulation theory precisely because they're unable to fully experience life as lived experience.
December 9, 2025 at 6:00 PM
I'm convinced that these yahoos are so obsessed with simulation theory precisely because they're unable to fully experience life as lived experience.