The point is to send a little wake up call to management
February 4, 2026 at 5:11 AM
The point is to send a little wake up call to management
Read a dang poll, Chuck. This is not what they want.
February 4, 2026 at 1:35 AM
Read a dang poll, Chuck. This is not what they want.
Yeah, maybe, but they're going to find out it's a lot harder to mess with an election than they think
February 3, 2026 at 10:34 PM
Yeah, maybe, but they're going to find out it's a lot harder to mess with an election than they think
So he’s a dumb asshole who deserves it but it was wrong to interrupt him…because there are kids starving in Africa?
February 3, 2026 at 2:35 PM
So he’s a dumb asshole who deserves it but it was wrong to interrupt him…because there are kids starving in Africa?
Not loving this Worlds Wrongest Guy character
February 3, 2026 at 1:14 AM
Not loving this Worlds Wrongest Guy character
SpaceX reportedly makes a fortune selling satellite internet. The rockets are secondary at this point.
February 2, 2026 at 10:05 PM
SpaceX reportedly makes a fortune selling satellite internet. The rockets are secondary at this point.
He wants to take SpaceX public and it makes an obscene amount of money selling rural internet access. xAI loses a ton of money (even before it was saddled with X) so I figure he's trying to get the WSB types to float that boondoggle
February 2, 2026 at 10:01 PM
He wants to take SpaceX public and it makes an obscene amount of money selling rural internet access. xAI loses a ton of money (even before it was saddled with X) so I figure he's trying to get the WSB types to float that boondoggle
Anything's possible. My point was just the claim is very thinly sourced.
February 2, 2026 at 9:54 PM
Anything's possible. My point was just the claim is very thinly sourced.
According to “intelligence sources” who spoke to…the Daily Mail
February 2, 2026 at 7:30 PM
According to “intelligence sources” who spoke to…the Daily Mail
He got in his head that if he had “Twitter but blockchain” he could stop worrying about content moderation (lol). I give him credit for bankrolling some smart people to make the prototype and allowing them to spin it out, but it’s not like he designed it.
February 2, 2026 at 3:15 PM
He got in his head that if he had “Twitter but blockchain” he could stop worrying about content moderation (lol). I give him credit for bankrolling some smart people to make the prototype and allowing them to spin it out, but it’s not like he designed it.
“Random equals signs in emails” is def related to Quotable Printable encoding somehow though
February 1, 2026 at 8:27 PM
“Random equals signs in emails” is def related to Quotable Printable encoding somehow though
My theory is “failed to remove,” not inserted. And, I mean, obviously they badly messed this up. I’m not 100% sure how. Maybe broke the line endings so there was a meaningful character that got eaten after =\n instead of it being =\r\n. But now I’m doubting that.
February 1, 2026 at 8:14 PM
My theory is “failed to remove,” not inserted. And, I mean, obviously they badly messed this up. I’m not 100% sure how. Maybe broke the line endings so there was a meaningful character that got eaten after =\n instead of it being =\r\n. But now I’m doubting that.
Now why did it also “eat” meaningful characters in the email? That’s a good question! I assume whatever process DOJ used is busted. Wild guess: they messed up the line endings (LF instead of CRLF) in the raw file before decoding
February 1, 2026 at 7:44 PM
Now why did it also “eat” meaningful characters in the email? That’s a good question! I assume whatever process DOJ used is busted. Wild guess: they messed up the line endings (LF instead of CRLF) in the raw file before decoding
Might I also suggest: if agents show up to your door with a search warrant, let them take things but don’t answer questions or help out!
February 1, 2026 at 12:27 AM
Might I also suggest: if agents show up to your door with a search warrant, let them take things but don’t answer questions or help out!
Did they compel her in this case? I believe you that they can do so, but it seems like they just asked and she compiled.
February 1, 2026 at 12:24 AM
Did they compel her in this case? I believe you that they can do so, but it seems like they just asked and she compiled.
Probably the same lawyer who got him out of a libel suit for calling an innocent guy a pedo…
January 31, 2026 at 9:11 PM
Probably the same lawyer who got him out of a libel suit for calling an innocent guy a pedo…
Gawker had written about Epstein. No surprise he was happy to see them lose.
January 31, 2026 at 8:51 PM
Gawker had written about Epstein. No surprise he was happy to see them lose.
He says he “would have” shared the expenses. The trial had concluded a few months earlier.
January 31, 2026 at 8:50 PM
He says he “would have” shared the expenses. The trial had concluded a few months earlier.
Nah it’s fake www.justice.gov/epstein
January 31, 2026 at 6:46 PM
Nah it’s fake www.justice.gov/epstein
This link is a little clearer on quoted printable line breaks. The format kinda sucks lol justsolve.archiveteam.org/wiki/Quoted-printable
justsolve.archiveteam.org
January 31, 2026 at 4:12 PM
This link is a little clearer on quoted printable line breaks. The format kinda sucks lol justsolve.archiveteam.org/wiki/Quoted-printable
It was probably a “soft” line break. The format doesn’t allow long lines so it inserts line breaks preceded by an equals that the client is supposed to remove and unwrap. You’d hope whatever FBI email software could clean that up automatically but who knows.
January 31, 2026 at 4:10 PM
It was probably a “soft” line break. The format doesn’t allow long lines so it inserts line breaks preceded by an equals that the client is supposed to remove and unwrap. You’d hope whatever FBI email software could clean that up automatically but who knows.
Qanon started on 4chan - a huge red flag on Q to begin with! - and Epstein was obviously very active on 4chan and hanging out with its founder. That’s not, like, proof of anything but it is weird.
January 31, 2026 at 3:59 PM
Qanon started on 4chan - a huge red flag on Q to begin with! - and Epstein was obviously very active on 4chan and hanging out with its founder. That’s not, like, proof of anything but it is weird.