How?
By doing the actual work.
You're trying to square a circle. There is no solutn to the basic problem. You just shuffle it around, & end up back having to either do the work or stay oblivious not just to the errors from the LLM but to whether there are errors
How?
By doing the actual work.
You're trying to square a circle. There is no solutn to the basic problem. You just shuffle it around, & end up back having to either do the work or stay oblivious not just to the errors from the LLM but to whether there are errors
1. So then you have to do actual work to figure out if the sources are right! All you've done is move the epistemologic problem back a step. You cant get away from it.
2. Then you're not learning a topic at all and cant trust what you have
1. So then you have to do actual work to figure out if the sources are right! All you've done is move the epistemologic problem back a step. You cant get away from it.
2. Then you're not learning a topic at all and cant trust what you have
2. You dont read a summary or synopsis to understand a subject anyway
2. You dont read a summary or synopsis to understand a subject anyway