Werewolf Bar Kochba
banner
dickius.bsky.social
Werewolf Bar Kochba
@dickius.bsky.social
Former Elected Official. Anti-Fascism. T1 Beetus. Pharisee. Jurisprudence fetishist, inactive in 3 bars. Could do without sea lions. #AbolishTheSenate He/Him
This recipe includes potatoes, water, salt, pepper, and yogurt or sour cream.
November 27, 2025 at 2:09 PM
Nope, those verses don’t mention moneylenders
November 27, 2025 at 1:02 PM
the bible doesn’t mention any money lenders at a temple
November 27, 2025 at 4:45 AM
The law doesn’t ban landlords from using algorithms to set rents. Please journalism better.
November 27, 2025 at 2:06 AM
I doubt it but whatever
November 27, 2025 at 2:04 AM
Your friend Mike considers me an asshole for even asking the question.
November 27, 2025 at 1:37 AM
My mistake. It’s probably better to describe a statute by claiming that it bans things it doesn’t ban than to accurately summarize its contents.
November 27, 2025 at 1:01 AM
Some courts have (relatively recently) adopted the practice of adding “(cleaned up)” after a quotation to which they’ve made minor, insignificant edits.
November 27, 2025 at 12:28 AM
When did money lenders set up shop in the temple before?
November 27, 2025 at 12:20 AM
Jesus never encountered any money lenders at the Temple so far as anyone is aware. If he did, nobody thought to make a record of it.
November 27, 2025 at 12:20 AM
jesus never encountered any moneylenders in a temple so far as anyone is aware
November 27, 2025 at 12:19 AM
I was misled by the governor of West Virginia, who lied and said they were dead. Their condition has now been upgraded to “alive.”
November 26, 2025 at 11:48 PM
Again, I made no such assertion.
November 26, 2025 at 9:53 PM
Saying that the law prohibits the use of algorithms may make it more comprehensible, but that comes at the expense of describing the content of the law. Mazel Tov on finding the text of the law. I asked a question, and I didn’t ask you.
November 26, 2025 at 9:52 PM
My point was asking whether the law actually prohibits the use of algorithms, which apparently it does not.
November 26, 2025 at 9:49 PM
Sorry for asking a question about a law with which I’m unfamiliar.
November 26, 2025 at 9:48 PM
I didn’t assert that anywhere. Maybe you’re thinking of someone else.
November 26, 2025 at 9:46 PM
At best, the Sherman Act implies that. (I used to practice antitrust law for a living.)
November 26, 2025 at 9:32 PM
Even “manually” is an algorithm. “Rent shall be this amount I arbitrarily chose, multiplied by 1.0000.”
November 26, 2025 at 9:31 PM
Right, my question was whether OP misdescribed the law
November 26, 2025 at 9:30 PM