DavidT
@davidkt.bsky.social
Most people are decent and it's just a few ruining it for everyone else. One day we'll learn how to marginalise them into obscurity.
No DM's please ...
No DM's please ...
cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thu...
Fantastic picture.
Matt is clearly performing a conjuring trick he had perfected specially for Liz. That cup and saucer are about to vanish.
Liz, alas, is in mid ramble with her eyes firmly shut. He could take the cactus and the table and she still won't notice.
Fantastic picture.
Matt is clearly performing a conjuring trick he had perfected specially for Liz. That cup and saucer are about to vanish.
Liz, alas, is in mid ramble with her eyes firmly shut. He could take the cactus and the table and she still won't notice.
December 7, 2025 at 4:18 PM
cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thu...
Fantastic picture.
Matt is clearly performing a conjuring trick he had perfected specially for Liz. That cup and saucer are about to vanish.
Liz, alas, is in mid ramble with her eyes firmly shut. He could take the cactus and the table and she still won't notice.
Fantastic picture.
Matt is clearly performing a conjuring trick he had perfected specially for Liz. That cup and saucer are about to vanish.
Liz, alas, is in mid ramble with her eyes firmly shut. He could take the cactus and the table and she still won't notice.
It's their money. Every penny of it.
December 4, 2025 at 8:43 AM
It's their money. Every penny of it.
And guess who the Right Wing Press have as their useful idiots?
December 1, 2025 at 8:53 AM
And guess who the Right Wing Press have as their useful idiots?
Unfinished business? This is the guy who told us we should be like Norway...
November 3, 2025 at 5:43 PM
Unfinished business? This is the guy who told us we should be like Norway...
The BBC is fast becoming the Daily Mail. Take a story and turn it into something far more sinister.
Nobody does this better than Auntie’s resident drama queen - Chris Mason.
Nobody does this better than Auntie’s resident drama queen - Chris Mason.
October 28, 2025 at 7:51 AM
The BBC is fast becoming the Daily Mail. Take a story and turn it into something far more sinister.
Nobody does this better than Auntie’s resident drama queen - Chris Mason.
Nobody does this better than Auntie’s resident drama queen - Chris Mason.
Also qualifying as not news is this headline story from the Mail on Sunday. We now have feel righteously angered that Reeves is planning a tax on homes over £2million.
Homes over £2m account for 0.3% of all homes.
At my most generous, I reckon this will apply to 0.003% of all Mail readers.
Homes over £2m account for 0.3% of all homes.
At my most generous, I reckon this will apply to 0.003% of all Mail readers.
October 26, 2025 at 1:23 PM
Also qualifying as not news is this headline story from the Mail on Sunday. We now have feel righteously angered that Reeves is planning a tax on homes over £2million.
Homes over £2m account for 0.3% of all homes.
At my most generous, I reckon this will apply to 0.003% of all Mail readers.
Homes over £2m account for 0.3% of all homes.
At my most generous, I reckon this will apply to 0.003% of all Mail readers.
Blimey. A textbook example of how to comprehensively miss the point. Just read the middle paragraph and ignore everything else including the warning about the data in the middle paragraph, puff out your chest and let loose righteous indignation.
BOTH Antisemitism and Islamophobia are despicable.
BOTH Antisemitism and Islamophobia are despicable.
October 12, 2025 at 9:35 AM
Blimey. A textbook example of how to comprehensively miss the point. Just read the middle paragraph and ignore everything else including the warning about the data in the middle paragraph, puff out your chest and let loose righteous indignation.
BOTH Antisemitism and Islamophobia are despicable.
BOTH Antisemitism and Islamophobia are despicable.
@thetimes.com
I'd be fascinated to know why this is not a suitable comment to an article headlined as "Migration destroying Britain ‘from within’, Trump tells Starmer".
I'd be fascinated to know why this is not a suitable comment to an article headlined as "Migration destroying Britain ‘from within’, Trump tells Starmer".
September 19, 2025 at 8:19 AM
@thetimes.com
I'd be fascinated to know why this is not a suitable comment to an article headlined as "Migration destroying Britain ‘from within’, Trump tells Starmer".
I'd be fascinated to know why this is not a suitable comment to an article headlined as "Migration destroying Britain ‘from within’, Trump tells Starmer".
Ah yes. The low hundreds aka the few hundreds. Not to be confused with the mighty mid low hundreds.
August 23, 2025 at 5:50 PM
Ah yes. The low hundreds aka the few hundreds. Not to be confused with the mighty mid low hundreds.
And yet the BBC very deliberately spins it a different way - twice, if we didn't get the message the first time.
This is the same BBC who told us back in May that growth at 0.7% was not predicted to last.
FFS. We're ahead of forecast. Appalling bias - they should be thoroughly ashamed.
This is the same BBC who told us back in May that growth at 0.7% was not predicted to last.
FFS. We're ahead of forecast. Appalling bias - they should be thoroughly ashamed.
August 14, 2025 at 7:12 AM
And yet the BBC very deliberately spins it a different way - twice, if we didn't get the message the first time.
This is the same BBC who told us back in May that growth at 0.7% was not predicted to last.
FFS. We're ahead of forecast. Appalling bias - they should be thoroughly ashamed.
This is the same BBC who told us back in May that growth at 0.7% was not predicted to last.
FFS. We're ahead of forecast. Appalling bias - they should be thoroughly ashamed.
It's appalling. A clear indication of bias at the BBC.
There is only one story - growth came in ahead of forecast. They had already reported the story they've decided is the news - growth slowing down - back in May ("this level of growth is not expected to last')
There is only one story - growth came in ahead of forecast. They had already reported the story they've decided is the news - growth slowing down - back in May ("this level of growth is not expected to last')
August 14, 2025 at 7:06 AM
It's appalling. A clear indication of bias at the BBC.
There is only one story - growth came in ahead of forecast. They had already reported the story they've decided is the news - growth slowing down - back in May ("this level of growth is not expected to last')
There is only one story - growth came in ahead of forecast. They had already reported the story they've decided is the news - growth slowing down - back in May ("this level of growth is not expected to last')
Would it kill the BBC to remind us that the Conservatives Rwanda scheme cost £700 million and only four people were sent - all of them volunteers?
August 7, 2025 at 10:32 AM
Would it kill the BBC to remind us that the Conservatives Rwanda scheme cost £700 million and only four people were sent - all of them volunteers?
Ah. A blast back in time to the end of the '60's when they briefly became de rigueur for Rock Stars.
August 4, 2025 at 8:37 AM
Ah. A blast back in time to the end of the '60's when they briefly became de rigueur for Rock Stars.
and unfortunately, you're not the expert you think you are.
/mutes
/mutes
August 2, 2025 at 9:42 PM
and unfortunately, you're not the expert you think you are.
/mutes
/mutes
Ermine for the likes of Daniel Hannan and Toby Young?
This from the IFS...
This from the IFS...
July 6, 2025 at 12:23 PM
Ermine for the likes of Daniel Hannan and Toby Young?
This from the IFS...
This from the IFS...
I'd be astonished if we looking at like-for -like. Bet we're not.
Here's a further breakdown of the UK's expenditure. Interesting that the bottom three always get all the attention while the top two - get none.
Here's a further breakdown of the UK's expenditure. Interesting that the bottom three always get all the attention while the top two - get none.
July 6, 2025 at 9:56 AM
I'd be astonished if we looking at like-for -like. Bet we're not.
Here's a further breakdown of the UK's expenditure. Interesting that the bottom three always get all the attention while the top two - get none.
Here's a further breakdown of the UK's expenditure. Interesting that the bottom three always get all the attention while the top two - get none.
It was in their manifesto.
June 11, 2025 at 12:05 PM
It was in their manifesto.
How about the same safety net the rest of the country has if anyone loses their job?
May 28, 2025 at 8:57 AM
How about the same safety net the rest of the country has if anyone loses their job?
Also happened in Miami...
Elsewhere, CH has recently been arguing that the new engines regulations need to be changed "for the good of the sport" (translation: "for the good of my bank balance"). If he is really interested in doing things for the good of the sport he'd resign today.
Elsewhere, CH has recently been arguing that the new engines regulations need to be changed "for the good of the sport" (translation: "for the good of my bank balance"). If he is really interested in doing things for the good of the sport he'd resign today.
May 5, 2025 at 9:02 AM
Also happened in Miami...
Elsewhere, CH has recently been arguing that the new engines regulations need to be changed "for the good of the sport" (translation: "for the good of my bank balance"). If he is really interested in doing things for the good of the sport he'd resign today.
Elsewhere, CH has recently been arguing that the new engines regulations need to be changed "for the good of the sport" (translation: "for the good of my bank balance"). If he is really interested in doing things for the good of the sport he'd resign today.
A masterclass in stating the bleedin' obvious.
April 23, 2025 at 6:55 AM
A masterclass in stating the bleedin' obvious.
