David Flood
davidcflood.bsky.social
David Flood
@davidcflood.bsky.social
Med-Peds doc, global health researcher, Guatemalaphile, likes to bake bread, Asst Prof @U-Michigan
He mentally 1-2 days feels better though I recognize it is not logicalLu optimal to have that delay
November 16, 2025 at 6:16 PM
This comment is evergreen
November 14, 2025 at 2:15 PM
Even discounting Kelly's future cash flows at 5-6%, the present value of his contract is ~$45mm, meaning he leaves $20mm on the table by taking the $25mm deal.

But LSU apparently offered to cut out his "duty to mitigate" clause, which allows LSU to offset payments against Kelly's future earnings.
November 10, 2025 at 7:27 PM
www.cochranelibrary.com
November 7, 2025 at 1:58 PM
May I ask: Reports from whom? Do you have a reference? I have not seen reporting to this effect.
November 6, 2025 at 12:59 AM
@mikejohansenmd.medsky.social The fatal flaw is they pre-specified a clinically relevant absolute risk threshold without considering time horizon or base rate.

The base rate in these trials of <1 year was 0.5%, which is less than the 1% absolute risk reduction they said was clinically significant.
November 4, 2025 at 2:50 AM
This RRR is even greater than that for high-intensity statins in meta analyses!
November 4, 2025 at 2:09 AM
I think in the present era Cochrane probably does more harm than good.
November 3, 2025 at 11:01 PM
The test characteristics for screening for CKD are very different than for the diseases you mention. The benefits of treatment also different.
October 27, 2025 at 7:38 PM
The pediatric world is different but I am not convinced of this idea:

bsky.app/profile/rhea...
October 26, 2025 at 1:26 PM
Screening is seductive especially to specialists who see the impact of these terrible diseases. But unfortunately screening often is not as effective as we would hope.
October 26, 2025 at 1:04 PM
Weird. The pdf shows the abstract version not the pubmed version.
October 26, 2025 at 12:59 PM
The other thing is that the methods of the per protocol analyses are summarized in one paragraph without much detail. No mention in supplement. These analyses are not trivial (including simulation!), like another full paper. I would like to see what assumptions and methods are being used here.
October 26, 2025 at 12:51 PM
This is what I see
October 26, 2025 at 12:47 PM
At a BMJ family journal, we had a manuscript repeatedly bounced back because the submission system did not auto detect all of the authors on a long author list. So they requested submit cumbersome form to “change authors”, signed by all authors, even though the manuscript shows no such change made.
October 15, 2025 at 12:42 PM
Journals are increasingly offshoring or AI-ing the gate keeping “quality control” functions before an editor even sees the manuscript.

It is so incredibly frustrating to get one’s manuscript bounced back for totally ridiculous and trivial issues. And it is impossible to get the journals to budge
October 15, 2025 at 12:39 PM
She was a truly remarkable person... her intellect, empathy, and moral clarity. No one else like her. Happy b-day Shekinah.
July 16, 2025 at 1:32 AM
@minnajohansson.bsky.social Thanks for writing this paper. Too many people overstate the benefit and understate the opportunity costs of promoting of individual behavior change in primary care.
December 6, 2024 at 2:22 PM
Hey Mike did you listen to this terrific Annals podcast with Minna Johannson that touches on this topic?

www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/...
Annals On Call - Lifestyle Recommendations: Can They Really Improve Public Health? | Annals of Internal Medicine
www.acpjournals.org
December 5, 2024 at 3:01 AM