Probably can't opine on this further without risking a ban from the app

just got back from banff yesterday it was like heaven

1000%. He has been horny to relitigate the Robinson decision that was not even before the Court in Louisiana v. Callais. He wants to say that Section 2 cannot offer race-based remedies outside outright denials (Blacks can’t cast a ballot). Majority will more likely gut the private right to sue.

100%. I’m more confused about a case like this: Does SB1 stop cis teen boys from getting testosterone treatment if they’re just really weak and puny but don’t have a “qualifying diagnosis.” I am still reading through the opinion but this hasn’t become clear to me yet. Maybe the dissent will help

This is what the majority says on that issue. Does that contradict what you’ve shared? Are they just lying?

Thanks for your coverage. There's just too many remaining cases to watch. Even Louisiana v. Callais has arguably fallen through the cracks in mainstream SCOTUS coverage. Going to be a hellish June.

NJ right?