Daniel A. Horwitz
@danielahorwitz.bsky.social
Constitutional litigator. Public interest/First Amendment/civil rights/innocence/election litigation. Nashville politics. Anti-SLAPP evangelist. Email daniel at horwitz.law. My views are my employer’s.
DM me, please.
November 27, 2025 at 5:14 PM
DM me, please.
T.C.A. § 2-19-133, too.
November 27, 2025 at 4:12 AM
T.C.A. § 2-19-133, too.
It could be charged as interference with another's rights under T.C.A. § 2-19-103.
November 27, 2025 at 4:08 AM
It could be charged as interference with another's rights under T.C.A. § 2-19-103.
I meant in the sense that they shouldn’t be judges anymore.
November 26, 2025 at 12:51 AM
I meant in the sense that they shouldn’t be judges anymore.
Agreed! This is the first use case I’ve encountered personally that seems clearly beneficial and industry-disrupting to me.
bsky.app/profile/atha...
bsky.app/profile/atha...
This is what AI does very well and I'm here for it. All you have to do is proofread a bit. But for normal meetings capturing and summarizing the meeting and action items its awesome and really game changing in corporate settings.
November 23, 2025 at 4:55 PM
Agreed! This is the first use case I’ve encountered personally that seems clearly beneficial and industry-disrupting to me.
bsky.app/profile/atha...
bsky.app/profile/atha...
Some of you are great! But some of you make huge numbers of basic errors and transcribe proceedings about Motions in Lemonade, etc., and all of you are expensive. This technology doesn’t charge a per diem and doesn’t charge $6 per page, and it’s better than most court reporters I’ve encountered.
November 23, 2025 at 3:35 PM
Some of you are great! But some of you make huge numbers of basic errors and transcribe proceedings about Motions in Lemonade, etc., and all of you are expensive. This technology doesn’t charge a per diem and doesn’t charge $6 per page, and it’s better than most court reporters I’ve encountered.
That’s a real improvement. Transcript expenses for long depositions and trials are very expensive—and cost prohibitive for a ton of litigants. Courts need to embrace with open arms whatever this technology is. It’s at a point where it’s better than humans (human court reporters make tons of errors).
November 23, 2025 at 3:27 PM
That’s a real improvement. Transcript expenses for long depositions and trials are very expensive—and cost prohibitive for a ton of litigants. Courts need to embrace with open arms whatever this technology is. It’s at a point where it’s better than humans (human court reporters make tons of errors).
For the first time ever, I also saw a court reporter just bring a laptop to a hearing last week (rather than that special keyboard thing they usually use). It quickly became clear she was following along, rather than typing. This technology is going to upend this corner of the industry.
November 23, 2025 at 3:24 PM
For the first time ever, I also saw a court reporter just bring a laptop to a hearing last week (rather than that special keyboard thing they usually use). It quickly became clear she was following along, rather than typing. This technology is going to upend this corner of the industry.