Daniel A. Horwitz
banner
danielahorwitz.bsky.social
Daniel A. Horwitz
@danielahorwitz.bsky.social
Constitutional litigator. Public interest/First Amendment/civil rights/innocence/election litigation. Nashville politics. Anti-SLAPP evangelist. Email daniel at horwitz.law. My views are my employer’s.
Lol Matt Van Epps was part of the $8 million graft purchase of those pesticide-laden sock masks (which had visible holes, for those of you who don’t live here). Incredible shit.

www.tennessean.com/story/news/p...
November 27, 2025 at 11:51 PM
I agree with this sentiment completely. Juries are wrong plenty of the time, but they are basically incorruptible, and not a single juror has ever worried about being reelected or reappointed to the position.
November 26, 2025 at 4:11 AM
Two of Tennessee’s Court of Criminal Appeals judges just disqualified themselves in a shaken baby case. The Governor’s Council for Judicial appointments just nominated *both* of them for a promotion to the Tennessee Supreme Court.
November 26, 2025 at 12:05 AM
Every Van Epps ad
November 22, 2025 at 5:02 PM
If you ever wondered why lawyers get spearphished so much, it’s because clerks send egregious emails that look like this every goddamn day (this is real)
November 19, 2025 at 5:30 PM
November 19, 2025 at 3:51 AM
For those of you who aren't programmers, 429 is the code for my children
November 11, 2025 at 3:36 AM
Intermediate Scrutiny for November 1–7, 2025: horwitzlawpllc.cmail19.com/t/y-e-qulhuo...
November 9, 2025 at 6:42 PM
Also, just for fun, here was the District Court’s pre-enforcement standing analysis in my own case, which followed *me getting gagged and ordered to delete statements under threat of contempt and then the same court declining to find the challenged rule problematic in a separate case after that*:
November 7, 2025 at 1:12 AM
I almost can’t believe this. I spend an absurd amount of time litigating pre-enforcement standing in the 6th Circuit, which makes establishing pre-enforcement standing near impossible. *En banc,* the 6th Circuit just blessed pre-enforcement standing in a culture war case with wafer-thin analysis.
November 7, 2025 at 12:44 AM
No notes
November 6, 2025 at 2:54 AM
🙄 What a fucking joke this guy is.
November 5, 2025 at 1:10 PM
November 2, 2025 at 10:13 PM
So I got qualified for a line of credit, which I did not realize was a public event. Within minutes, I have been spammed incessantly by seemingly every lender in the country. They’ve been going all day. This seems like it should not be a thing?
October 20, 2025 at 9:07 PM
Somehow these three quotes from three separate dipshits who didn’t attend (two of whom don’t live in Nashville) made it into the article about the event.
October 19, 2025 at 2:52 AM
Intermediate Scrutiny for October 4–10, 2025: horwitzlawpllc.cmail19.com/t/y-e-qhiuut...
October 12, 2025 at 11:53 PM
October 11, 2025 at 12:04 AM
I tend to agree—and am ok with the analysis—as long as federal courts start adopting this reasoning for other critical anti-SLAPP provisions that do not plausibly conflict with federal rules of procedure (a small minority of courts do):
October 10, 2025 at 12:15 PM
Intermediate Scrutiny for September 20–October 3, 2025: horwitzlawpllc.cmail20.com/t/y-e-qhytud...
October 6, 2025 at 12:03 AM
September 26, 2025 at 11:22 PM
That’s my pops! Shana tova, folks.
September 23, 2025 at 3:04 AM
I genuinely don’t understand how Speaker Johnson has time for this. Congressmen shouldn’t have side-hustles.
September 22, 2025 at 12:15 PM
Intermediate Scrutiny for September 6-19, 2025: horwitzlawpllc.cmail19.com/t/y-e-qdinjl...
September 21, 2025 at 9:17 PM
Once a week, when I am sitting in an ergonomically criminal pew waiting for a Friday motion to be called, I peruse LinkedIn, which is hands down the most unhinged and ridiculous toxic social media app for lawyers, and it almost never disappoints. This is *atrocious* advice for many obvious reasons.
September 19, 2025 at 5:08 PM
Honestly it’s starting to feel like they aren’t sending their best
September 16, 2025 at 12:51 PM