Daffy Dils
LightNews LightNews
banner
daffydils.bsky.social
Daffy Dils
@daffydils.bsky.social
600 followers 1.2K following 57 posts
LGBTQ+ ally
I like politics, the EU and the NHS.
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by Daffy Dils
goodlawproject.org
This is the key paragraph in the Sandie Peggie decision.
(i) The Supreme Court decision 789. The question that arises from that conclusion is whether the application of the Supreme Court decision must mean that, under the provisions over which this Tribunal has jurisdiction under the 2010 Act as to work, the second respondent as a biological male required to be excluded from the female changing room, such that the permission given by the first respondent to do so was necessarily unlawful under those provisions. We have concluded that the answer is in the negative.
December 8, 2025 at 2:07 PM