N Sims
banner
copyrightlibn.bsky.social
N Sims
@copyrightlibn.bsky.social
Copyright specialist at UMN Libs, JD/MLIS. IP & techlaw, leftishness. Random pets/bugs/crafts/hyperlocal politics, etc. Gender-ambivalent, any pronouns fine.
"Oil in my lamp" is not a phrase I've heard before, but it is very evocative.
What a blessing!
December 6, 2025 at 3:44 AM
Reposted by N Sims
the law is real until it gets to SCOTUS at which point it becomes fake, which doesn't bother the six reactionaries at the top but does undermine literally everyone else in the profession
September 30, 2025 at 5:17 PM
But doesn't he convince them he's offsite tech support or something to do so? That's social engineering.
December 5, 2025 at 8:16 PM
😄
December 5, 2025 at 5:06 PM
Right???????,
December 5, 2025 at 4:45 PM
Maybe slap the person making you use the confidently wrong asshole tool?
December 5, 2025 at 4:45 PM
Oh, thanks for the reminder that i need to figure out what I messed up with the site hosting most recently.
Also glad you like it!
December 5, 2025 at 1:13 AM
#. Those thin synthetic facemasks you are already using are really great for keeping your face warm in extended periods outside. If the surface starts to freeze, don't worry about it, your masks will do great insulating your skin from that.
December 4, 2025 at 6:12 PM
-Most- frequently by an academic tech employee who has to post course materials for a faculty member, when the faculty member is being edgy. (Our local policies say © is the instructor's call, but they need to make informed & reasonable decisions.)
December 4, 2025 at 2:29 AM
Also, for clarity, i think of this as worker protection bc it's often asked by a low-level employee (here and at other schools) who wants to know their butt won't be on the line for a © decision they have qualms about but no power to change.
December 4, 2025 at 2:29 AM
Tho I also pretty much always point out that if an institution -wants- to hang an employee out to dry, they will. And they'll sometimes do it to everyone involved in the action down the reporting chain.
December 4, 2025 at 2:20 AM
Ah. In this context, it's about things like low-level employees, instructed by someone "above" them, to do something they -think- might be a copyright law violation. To my mind, it's a worker protection in that, if someone sues, it shouldn't be the low-level employee's butt on the line.
December 4, 2025 at 2:20 AM
...in the much more common situations of exploitative/hierarchical working conditions that -don't- involve any atrocities is maybe further from mind.
(Hence my pointing out that illegality is in no way synonymous with immorality (& vice versa and verce visa and...)
December 4, 2025 at 12:58 AM
Oh yeah, I think it was coming (relayed through friend) from someone who is, for very legitimate reasons, thinking a lot lately about the appeal of a "just following orders" defense around present atrocities.
And if you're focused on that end of things, the need for worker protections...
December 4, 2025 at 12:58 AM
Among my other thoughts here, I did say "I hope your German studies friend can see the distinction between illegality and immorality" (in all the directions it may run)
And also, I don't think copyright can ever rise to the level of immorality where worker protections aren't relevant.
December 3, 2025 at 11:18 PM
Reposted by N Sims
I mean the funny story here is "all the kids of your friends are faking disabilities" (i am not saying this is true, i am saying this is why they are having a hard time figuring out what to be mad about)
December 2, 2025 at 6:58 PM
Yeah, "unitary exec - but for good" is how we -got to- the current idiocy with executive orders. It was bad when Obama and Biden used them, too.
December 3, 2025 at 3:14 PM