He's been a wannabe Dark Lord since his failed student gov election campaign. bsky.app/profile/carm...

Demand accountability from IL government. It's not good enough to hold press conferences expressing concern and tweet snark about federal leaders. You said you would protect IL residents and yet state police were collaborating with the fascists this morning.

Some real ancient aliens level reasoning on display

Right? NWS was issuing warnings all night. www.usatoday.com/story/news/w...

Remember when Joe Rogan was mad Kamala didn't have time to come on his little show and pay attention to him, so he told everyone to vote for Trump instead? I remember what a petty, stupid man he is.

Then why is CT reporting he personally made 1.3 million? www.christianitytoday.com/2025/06/trum...

It's like a new form of mansplaining (I don't see women doing it). I'm going to dub it CHATsplaining. And yes, it's just as annoying. How 'bout you respond to what I said instead of telling me what I really meant, bud?

Not New Hampshire state Rep Jess Edwards describing teenagers as “ripe" and "fertile." 🤮🚩

That is what I understand the point to be also. You can't challenge election results after they have been certified. But we could throw people in prison. I really wish old-fashioned smiting would come back in style because all the waiting around for justice is not very satisfying.

Someone on Threads got me this fact check:

I think it's that New York court case that has brought it all up again. I hate that I am sounding like a crazy uncle on Facebook, but we live in bizarro world now and the writers for this season of reality jumped the shark a while ago. And you can't trust institutional journalism anymore. Help!

So no one is alleging the printouts were corrupted by the voting machines and people just did not check them before having them scanned, right? They are alleging the scanners changed votes or did not record votes?

I guess unless votes were being recorded incorrectly and people were not checking, a recount would bring to light discrepancies with how the printouts were scanned.

I haven't voted in person in a while, but last time I did it was a touchscreen that gives you a printout you are supposed to check, and then you feed it into another machine that reads and counts the printout. But it's computers running on software that generate the printout and read the printout.

But is it just the scanners? This from that Substack last week "These changes...touched ballot scanners, altered reporting software, and modified audit files—yet were all rubber-stamped with no oversight." thiswillhold.substack.com/p/she-won-th...?

Right, but they are alleging satellite controlled software compromised the recording of the votes by the machine, so wouldn't that also compromise the paper backup copy of what the machine recorded you touched on the screen?

Wouldn't theoretical re-counts be counting the allegedly fraudulently manipulated/changed votes? Isn't that the whole issue under discussion, whether the tampering would be traceable or not?

Would recounts have even mattered if what the people are claiming about the alleged tampering is true. If votes were being manipulated or erased at the level of the voting machines, how would re-counting those fraudulently changed/recorded votes help anything?