Luminiferous Ether/Or(wellian)
@cira.bsky.social
Was Orwellian, now we all are. BASEBALL! SABR member! SHOHEI OHTANI ENTHUSIAST. +History/philosophy of science (esp history of quantum), museum exhibit dev, global postpunk obscurities, HAMSTER PIX, the www, "far left"...it's all happening on Bsky, hot dog
Did you see the Jailbait song …?? I’m just parsing this now
November 19, 2025 at 4:02 AM
Did you see the Jailbait song …?? I’m just parsing this now
A big sign from the universe for all of us, huh? Or at least for me…..
November 18, 2025 at 1:48 PM
A big sign from the universe for all of us, huh? Or at least for me…..
This is REAL?!
November 18, 2025 at 1:44 PM
This is REAL?!
Sharing inside jokes with myself at 4:30am on the bsky site
November 17, 2025 at 9:34 AM
Sharing inside jokes with myself at 4:30am on the bsky site
No MVP seasons for Piazza either. Mets have never had an MVP!
November 14, 2025 at 9:36 PM
No MVP seasons for Piazza either. Mets have never had an MVP!
I think Pedro is more impressive, yeah, but if I’m building a team I take Gibson!
I want you guys to have a face off with Russell on The Case For podcast ahaha
I want you guys to have a face off with Russell on The Case For podcast ahaha
November 14, 2025 at 9:32 PM
I think Pedro is more impressive, yeah, but if I’m building a team I take Gibson!
I want you guys to have a face off with Russell on The Case For podcast ahaha
I want you guys to have a face off with Russell on The Case For podcast ahaha
You guys are great at saying things I totally disagree with ahahaha (but I would put Nomar in the HoF)
The question of value is an interesting one though. Like I would take Gibson’s 1968 over Pedro’s 1999 or 2000 just because of the sheer amount of IP and Pedro is my favorite
The question of value is an interesting one though. Like I would take Gibson’s 1968 over Pedro’s 1999 or 2000 just because of the sheer amount of IP and Pedro is my favorite
November 14, 2025 at 8:56 PM
You guys are great at saying things I totally disagree with ahahaha (but I would put Nomar in the HoF)
The question of value is an interesting one though. Like I would take Gibson’s 1968 over Pedro’s 1999 or 2000 just because of the sheer amount of IP and Pedro is my favorite
The question of value is an interesting one though. Like I would take Gibson’s 1968 over Pedro’s 1999 or 2000 just because of the sheer amount of IP and Pedro is my favorite
Oh whoops!!! I completely missed that. Actually got it totally wrong ahahaha. Thank you! That must be what it is. Vibes were just so weird
November 14, 2025 at 8:49 PM
Oh whoops!!! I completely missed that. Actually got it totally wrong ahahaha. Thank you! That must be what it is. Vibes were just so weird
I am impressed!!! Own it
November 14, 2025 at 6:28 AM
I am impressed!!! Own it
Right lol. Made a lot of sense!
November 14, 2025 at 4:21 AM
Right lol. Made a lot of sense!
It’s weird, right? He never won an MVP award. After that crushing postseason?
November 14, 2025 at 3:59 AM
It’s weird, right? He never won an MVP award. After that crushing postseason?
Great typo!
I thought you guys were Italian, I think you’ve talked about it on the show
Italy is also a WBC team, you can cheer for your roots!
I thought you guys were Italian, I think you’ve talked about it on the show
Italy is also a WBC team, you can cheer for your roots!
November 6, 2025 at 3:02 AM
Great typo!
I thought you guys were Italian, I think you’ve talked about it on the show
Italy is also a WBC team, you can cheer for your roots!
I thought you guys were Italian, I think you’ve talked about it on the show
Italy is also a WBC team, you can cheer for your roots!
This isn’t coming from a place of wanting to defend the Dodgers or Ohtani… I am not a Dodgers fan. The Yankees aren’t the problem here either.
November 2, 2025 at 8:25 AM
This isn’t coming from a place of wanting to defend the Dodgers or Ohtani… I am not a Dodgers fan. The Yankees aren’t the problem here either.
Reposted by Luminiferous Ether/Or(wellian)
This vicious modus operandi - publish, let it work its poison, and retract. "Nothing to see here. Uhm ..."
The call out for such behaviour needs to be strong and loud and sustained. This was not an accident.
(Let's be clear: This type of weaponizing of AI is going rampant already.)
The call out for such behaviour needs to be strong and loud and sustained. This was not an accident.
(Let's be clear: This type of weaponizing of AI is going rampant already.)
October 23, 2025 at 2:45 PM
This vicious modus operandi - publish, let it work its poison, and retract. "Nothing to see here. Uhm ..."
The call out for such behaviour needs to be strong and loud and sustained. This was not an accident.
(Let's be clear: This type of weaponizing of AI is going rampant already.)
The call out for such behaviour needs to be strong and loud and sustained. This was not an accident.
(Let's be clear: This type of weaponizing of AI is going rampant already.)