We've got lots of openings for Mesic Scrubland Witches, and it pays just as well as being a Bog Witch.

I should add (in case any of my past editors or reviewers are reading this) that said nitpicking has in most cases been warranted and strengthened my paper despite being annoying to address.

That's why you have to clone your butt and mix its genes with a hawk, I thought everybody knew that: www.amazon.com/Pounded-Butt...

It just boggles my mind that this somehow got through peer review considering the kind of nitpicking I've had to address to get my papers through peer review. Do mid-tier journals like Society and Natural Resources or Field Methods just have stronger peer review systems than the big boys?

"Hmmm, I could develop critical thinking skills ... or I could just chant 'rationality!' like a mantra all the time."

The Wayback Machine shows this site was around as early as 2020 (over 2 years before chatgpt) doing the same kind of articles, so I'm inclined to think this is true human genius.

Also my phone is five years old and still chugging along -- hoping to squeeze another year or two out of it. I had to buy a new laptop this year because the screen on my old one (4 years old) was literally falling off and it was choking on some of the more complex maps I was doing for my book.

Uh oh, now AI can do a CEO's job. Maybe now they'll be worried about it.