Researching internet nonfiction books, cultural histories of information overwhelm, and the different metaphors we use for human versus machine cognition.
open.substack.com/pub/jessicad...
open.substack.com/pub/jessicad...
One of the main answers: the method of close reading.
But that has led to some really interesting historicising of how close reading developed (see Dan Sinykin and Johanna Winant forthcoming book on close reading).
One of the main answers: the method of close reading.
But that has led to some really interesting historicising of how close reading developed (see Dan Sinykin and Johanna Winant forthcoming book on close reading).
He basically asks: with the capacious breadth of 21st c literary studies (ecocriticism, queer studies, diaspora literatures etc are all very different subfields), where is
He basically asks: with the capacious breadth of 21st c literary studies (ecocriticism, queer studies, diaspora literatures etc are all very different subfields), where is
Not so much "can literary studies save the world", more like "is it worth/possible to save literary studies".
Not so much "can literary studies save the world", more like "is it worth/possible to save literary studies".