Clifton
@chamiltochem.bsky.social
Pharmaceutical scientist and political leftist
Free Palestine
Free Palestine
No. I don’t. I read it. I responded to it. It’s still just as dumb as the first time I responded to it. You’ve added no context to make it less dumb. Maybe you should read your first post, where you yourself say you didn’t even read her comments and are just blindly making excuses for her?
Bye
Bye
November 19, 2025 at 7:55 PM
No. I don’t. I read it. I responded to it. It’s still just as dumb as the first time I responded to it. You’ve added no context to make it less dumb. Maybe you should read your first post, where you yourself say you didn’t even read her comments and are just blindly making excuses for her?
Bye
Bye
@hankgreen.bsky.social hey ummm…
You follow some weird garbage troll accounts which results in your followers getting their trash in our feed.
Just thought you might think better of essentially promoting random troll accounts.
You follow some weird garbage troll accounts which results in your followers getting their trash in our feed.
Just thought you might think better of essentially promoting random troll accounts.
November 18, 2025 at 8:06 PM
@hankgreen.bsky.social hey ummm…
You follow some weird garbage troll accounts which results in your followers getting their trash in our feed.
Just thought you might think better of essentially promoting random troll accounts.
You follow some weird garbage troll accounts which results in your followers getting their trash in our feed.
Just thought you might think better of essentially promoting random troll accounts.
The way they use Israel and anything Israeli as a synonym for "Jewish" is so telling. The real antisemites are quite clearly the Israelis, insisting that their actions represent all Jews throughout the world.
Also the irony of this statement while supporting Israel:
Also the irony of this statement while supporting Israel:
October 17, 2025 at 1:22 PM
The way they use Israel and anything Israeli as a synonym for "Jewish" is so telling. The real antisemites are quite clearly the Israelis, insisting that their actions represent all Jews throughout the world.
Also the irony of this statement while supporting Israel:
Also the irony of this statement while supporting Israel:
She cannot do the same with him, because he does not disclose that funding sources of the 1630 fund, nor the recipients of those funds. That’s the literal definition of “dark money.”
The dictionary exists, my dude, and you don’t get to make your own definitions.
The dictionary exists, my dude, and you don’t get to make your own definitions.
August 31, 2025 at 5:37 AM
She cannot do the same with him, because he does not disclose that funding sources of the 1630 fund, nor the recipients of those funds. That’s the literal definition of “dark money.”
The dictionary exists, my dude, and you don’t get to make your own definitions.
The dictionary exists, my dude, and you don’t get to make your own definitions.
I’m happy to say that in this case you’re wrong. The correction only has 1/3 fewer likes than the incorrect statement, and only has 29 shares.
Yes, lots of ignorant people will accept what confirms their priors, but we can’t alter all our behavior to try and educate the willfully ignorant.
Yes, lots of ignorant people will accept what confirms their priors, but we can’t alter all our behavior to try and educate the willfully ignorant.
July 28, 2025 at 9:16 PM
I’m happy to say that in this case you’re wrong. The correction only has 1/3 fewer likes than the incorrect statement, and only has 29 shares.
Yes, lots of ignorant people will accept what confirms their priors, but we can’t alter all our behavior to try and educate the willfully ignorant.
Yes, lots of ignorant people will accept what confirms their priors, but we can’t alter all our behavior to try and educate the willfully ignorant.
Prior to the Arab spring, they were explicitly not a democracy, yet we gave them 30 years of military support. There have been more issues with us suspending or threatening to suspend aid since their autocrat was overthrown than there were before they adopted a constitution.
July 15, 2025 at 2:12 AM
Prior to the Arab spring, they were explicitly not a democracy, yet we gave them 30 years of military support. There have been more issues with us suspending or threatening to suspend aid since their autocrat was overthrown than there were before they adopted a constitution.
Our aid to Egypt is almost exclusively attached to their relations with Israel and Palestine, and has no relation to whether they’re democratic, nor whether they recognize a specific religion. Additionally, their constitution forbids religious parties, so you weren’t even technically correct.
July 15, 2025 at 2:12 AM
Our aid to Egypt is almost exclusively attached to their relations with Israel and Palestine, and has no relation to whether they’re democratic, nor whether they recognize a specific religion. Additionally, their constitution forbids religious parties, so you weren’t even technically correct.
@rokhanna.bsky.social your answers on SMN regarding your support of an ethnostate in Israel were disingenuous. When pressed on this topic, you brought up our support for an ethnostate in Egypt, but you know our support for Egypt is an extension of our support for Israel.
July 15, 2025 at 2:12 AM
@rokhanna.bsky.social your answers on SMN regarding your support of an ethnostate in Israel were disingenuous. When pressed on this topic, you brought up our support for an ethnostate in Egypt, but you know our support for Egypt is an extension of our support for Israel.
It’s weird to think you can’t learn about history unless the products of our worst behaviors are lovingly preserved…
But also she apparently wouldn’t have learned anyone’s names had she toured the site.
But also she apparently wouldn’t have learned anyone’s names had she toured the site.
May 20, 2025 at 1:13 AM
It’s weird to think you can’t learn about history unless the products of our worst behaviors are lovingly preserved…
But also she apparently wouldn’t have learned anyone’s names had she toured the site.
But also she apparently wouldn’t have learned anyone’s names had she toured the site.
And the Trumpy fuckers know this-
Elon Musk's first big layoff at Tesla was for 86 people in one pant, and 420 at his other plant.
He wasn't planning to kill Tesla, those employees, or weed.
Elon Musk's first big layoff at Tesla was for 86 people in one pant, and 420 at his other plant.
He wasn't planning to kill Tesla, those employees, or weed.
May 16, 2025 at 9:15 PM
And the Trumpy fuckers know this-
Elon Musk's first big layoff at Tesla was for 86 people in one pant, and 420 at his other plant.
He wasn't planning to kill Tesla, those employees, or weed.
Elon Musk's first big layoff at Tesla was for 86 people in one pant, and 420 at his other plant.
He wasn't planning to kill Tesla, those employees, or weed.
Senate rules are fake. There always a loophole, democrats just never use them to actually help, but are more than willing to watch republicans use them to hurt people.
March 28, 2025 at 3:59 AM
Senate rules are fake. There always a loophole, democrats just never use them to actually help, but are more than willing to watch republicans use them to hurt people.
They are astoundingly stupid, but they are publicly offering them up…
March 28, 2025 at 3:57 AM
They are astoundingly stupid, but they are publicly offering them up…
Because the filibuster is fake and there’s always some dumb senate rule that allows one to evade the filibuster, but for some reason democrats never actually use these tactics when they have power.
I am really thinking elected democrats don’t actually give a shit.
I am really thinking elected democrats don’t actually give a shit.
March 28, 2025 at 3:56 AM
Because the filibuster is fake and there’s always some dumb senate rule that allows one to evade the filibuster, but for some reason democrats never actually use these tactics when they have power.
I am really thinking elected democrats don’t actually give a shit.
I am really thinking elected democrats don’t actually give a shit.
Listen to Tim Scott’s logic… it will murder your brain cells.
March 28, 2025 at 3:51 AM
Listen to Tim Scott’s logic… it will murder your brain cells.
Why wasn’t this filibustered? Only reconciliation is able to evade the filibuster, so why didn’t Hawley and the Dems filibuster?
Also did you see Tim Scott’s mind numbing stupid reasoning for increasing bank overdraft fees? He said this was to help consumers by responding to inflation?
Whhhhaaat?
Also did you see Tim Scott’s mind numbing stupid reasoning for increasing bank overdraft fees? He said this was to help consumers by responding to inflation?
Whhhhaaat?
March 28, 2025 at 3:51 AM
Why wasn’t this filibustered? Only reconciliation is able to evade the filibuster, so why didn’t Hawley and the Dems filibuster?
Also did you see Tim Scott’s mind numbing stupid reasoning for increasing bank overdraft fees? He said this was to help consumers by responding to inflation?
Whhhhaaat?
Also did you see Tim Scott’s mind numbing stupid reasoning for increasing bank overdraft fees? He said this was to help consumers by responding to inflation?
Whhhhaaat?
Can we talk more about the 75+ years Israel has behaved as a US backed terrorist state?
None of this is new.
www.middleeasteye.net/news/investi...
None of this is new.
www.middleeasteye.net/news/investi...
February 23, 2025 at 1:21 PM
Can we talk more about the 75+ years Israel has behaved as a US backed terrorist state?
None of this is new.
www.middleeasteye.net/news/investi...
None of this is new.
www.middleeasteye.net/news/investi...
History is recorded.
You quite literally put the thing it “didn’t work” at was preventing him from being elected president a second time. You apparently expected that as a result of deplatforming.
Also, you’re not everyone.
Bye!
You quite literally put the thing it “didn’t work” at was preventing him from being elected president a second time. You apparently expected that as a result of deplatforming.
Also, you’re not everyone.
Bye!
February 3, 2025 at 7:04 PM
History is recorded.
You quite literally put the thing it “didn’t work” at was preventing him from being elected president a second time. You apparently expected that as a result of deplatforming.
Also, you’re not everyone.
Bye!
You quite literally put the thing it “didn’t work” at was preventing him from being elected president a second time. You apparently expected that as a result of deplatforming.
Also, you’re not everyone.
Bye!
But… there were essentially no crossover voters.
Democrats won 95% of democrats, and republicans won 95% of republicans. It was the election with the least crossover vote in polling history, and democrats won independents.
Basically, everyone that said inflation and the economy were bad were are
Democrats won 95% of democrats, and republicans won 95% of republicans. It was the election with the least crossover vote in polling history, and democrats won independents.
Basically, everyone that said inflation and the economy were bad were are
February 3, 2025 at 11:34 AM
But… there were essentially no crossover voters.
Democrats won 95% of democrats, and republicans won 95% of republicans. It was the election with the least crossover vote in polling history, and democrats won independents.
Basically, everyone that said inflation and the economy were bad were are
Democrats won 95% of democrats, and republicans won 95% of republicans. It was the election with the least crossover vote in polling history, and democrats won independents.
Basically, everyone that said inflation and the economy were bad were are
Her own statement indicated that her only change from Biden would be to put a Republican in her cabinet.
If you remove a huge progressive chunk of voters, voters are going to appear more conservative, unless you account for the disengaged.
If you remove a huge progressive chunk of voters, voters are going to appear more conservative, unless you account for the disengaged.
February 2, 2025 at 2:41 PM
Her own statement indicated that her only change from Biden would be to put a Republican in her cabinet.
If you remove a huge progressive chunk of voters, voters are going to appear more conservative, unless you account for the disengaged.
If you remove a huge progressive chunk of voters, voters are going to appear more conservative, unless you account for the disengaged.
Great show, but your episode on measuring butter missed a few variables: butter is a complex mixture fat, salt, and milk products that may vary from batch to batch, which impacts density. Additionally, density changes with temperature. This can cause a variation of 5-10%.
January 12, 2025 at 9:35 PM
Great show, but your episode on measuring butter missed a few variables: butter is a complex mixture fat, salt, and milk products that may vary from batch to batch, which impacts density. Additionally, density changes with temperature. This can cause a variation of 5-10%.
We're talking about bragging that her favored politician won control of a party that just got obliterated and only controls 1/6th of the seats on parliament?
January 5, 2025 at 1:07 AM
We're talking about bragging that her favored politician won control of a party that just got obliterated and only controls 1/6th of the seats on parliament?
And again, I'm not the author of the original post in this thread, which is the one that decided we needed to crown a king of murdering civilians.
You're free to lecture him if you'd like. My guess is you not only didn't lecture him, but probably liked his post about putin.
You're free to lecture him if you'd like. My guess is you not only didn't lecture him, but probably liked his post about putin.
December 29, 2024 at 5:57 PM
And again, I'm not the author of the original post in this thread, which is the one that decided we needed to crown a king of murdering civilians.
You're free to lecture him if you'd like. My guess is you not only didn't lecture him, but probably liked his post about putin.
You're free to lecture him if you'd like. My guess is you not only didn't lecture him, but probably liked his post about putin.
And used his office to improperly assist at least one woman who was providing sexual favors…
And the speaker believes the “terrible breach of the spirit of the law” is that the public is being informed about all these illegal activities, not the illegal activities themselves
Democracy is dead.
2/2
And the speaker believes the “terrible breach of the spirit of the law” is that the public is being informed about all these illegal activities, not the illegal activities themselves
Democracy is dead.
2/2
December 24, 2024 at 2:52 AM
And used his office to improperly assist at least one woman who was providing sexual favors…
And the speaker believes the “terrible breach of the spirit of the law” is that the public is being informed about all these illegal activities, not the illegal activities themselves
Democracy is dead.
2/2
And the speaker believes the “terrible breach of the spirit of the law” is that the public is being informed about all these illegal activities, not the illegal activities themselves
Democracy is dead.
2/2