‘crackdown’ implies unaddressed misbehavior; does the NYT think immigrants following legal processes are worthy of a ‘crackdown’?

70s prices for beer, but only 70s beer options. Schlitz was good enough for your dad, it’s good enough for you

plus, it’s a hard job! Be knowledgeable in public policy, economics, law, political strategy, and rhetoric; be willing to work crazy hours under crazy conditions; be responsible for important decisions, a massive budget, and huge bureaucracy. Any other job with those reqs pays $$$$

I understand the sound-bite appeals of unpaid or low-paid politicians, but it should be pretty obvious that this would lead to political positions occupied by the independently wealth, insane, or corrupt.

This shouldn't be that difficult.

"Advocating for norms doesn't mean we have to let them be used against us. Wanting a functional democracy doesn't mean unilateral disarmament."

But for Dems who want to harness No Kings energy, without falling into (what they see as) the trap of uncut anti-Trumpism, there are many things they can promise to do with power in 2027-2028, then in 2029 and beyond. Some even overlap with kitchen-table issues! www.offmessage.net/p/a-no-kings...

Very clear that Helen spends all day observing and arguing with figments of her imagination. Every female lawyer I know is a tough-as-nails, not to be fucked with, successful attorney.

Infinite Meh

Gotta be Rushmore

If only Bank of America were big enough to have a lobbyist ¯\_(ツ)_/¯