@britjunior.bsky.social
Midlands born and bred, but no longer as junior as I once was, but old enough to know better 🥴
Reposted
Keir Starmer on the Conservatives, "On consistency, don't get me started" #PMQs
"5 Prime Ministers
6 Chancellors
8 Home Secretaries
16 Housing Ministers"
"They had more positions in 14 years than the Karma Sutra"
"No wonder they're knackered"
"And they left the country screwed"
"5 Prime Ministers
6 Chancellors
8 Home Secretaries
16 Housing Ministers"
"They had more positions in 14 years than the Karma Sutra"
"No wonder they're knackered"
"And they left the country screwed"
January 14, 2026 at 4:53 PM
Keir Starmer on the Conservatives, "On consistency, don't get me started" #PMQs
"5 Prime Ministers
6 Chancellors
8 Home Secretaries
16 Housing Ministers"
"They had more positions in 14 years than the Karma Sutra"
"No wonder they're knackered"
"And they left the country screwed"
"5 Prime Ministers
6 Chancellors
8 Home Secretaries
16 Housing Ministers"
"They had more positions in 14 years than the Karma Sutra"
"No wonder they're knackered"
"And they left the country screwed"
Reposted
Amazingly, Zahawi only got round to deleting the below after the press conference announcing his defection to Reform.
January 12, 2026 at 12:09 PM
Amazingly, Zahawi only got round to deleting the below after the press conference announcing his defection to Reform.
Reposted
No Kemi, Trump threatening to invade a NATO ally is not a "second order issue."
It’s a direct challenge to Britain’s security and the future of NATO.
It’s a direct challenge to Britain’s security and the future of NATO.
January 11, 2026 at 2:34 PM
No Kemi, Trump threatening to invade a NATO ally is not a "second order issue."
It’s a direct challenge to Britain’s security and the future of NATO.
It’s a direct challenge to Britain’s security and the future of NATO.
Reposted
I call on my party and my government to remove themselves entirely from X and communicate with the public where they actually participate online and can be protected from such illegality.
January 8, 2026 at 12:31 PM
I call on my party and my government to remove themselves entirely from X and communicate with the public where they actually participate online and can be protected from such illegality.
Reposted
PPE Medpro has been liquidated but because it has only £0.6m only £0.6m of the £148m debt will be repaid.
A Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA), placed against Michelle Mone and Doug Barrowman (worth £500m+) would allow all the money to be recovered.
Why hasn't it happened?
A Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA), placed against Michelle Mone and Doug Barrowman (worth £500m+) would allow all the money to be recovered.
Why hasn't it happened?
December 19, 2025 at 2:22 PM
PPE Medpro has been liquidated but because it has only £0.6m only £0.6m of the £148m debt will be repaid.
A Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA), placed against Michelle Mone and Doug Barrowman (worth £500m+) would allow all the money to be recovered.
Why hasn't it happened?
A Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA), placed against Michelle Mone and Doug Barrowman (worth £500m+) would allow all the money to be recovered.
Why hasn't it happened?
Reposted
Look how visibly excited Robert Jenrick is by his brilliance as a statesman; how high on his own supply.
It is astonishing that this bitter, angry, talentless bingo-caller is considered a serious prospect in a major party. If he or Badenoch are the best they can do, what does it say about the rest?
It is astonishing that this bitter, angry, talentless bingo-caller is considered a serious prospect in a major party. If he or Badenoch are the best they can do, what does it say about the rest?
December 2, 2025 at 1:49 PM
Look how visibly excited Robert Jenrick is by his brilliance as a statesman; how high on his own supply.
It is astonishing that this bitter, angry, talentless bingo-caller is considered a serious prospect in a major party. If he or Badenoch are the best they can do, what does it say about the rest?
It is astonishing that this bitter, angry, talentless bingo-caller is considered a serious prospect in a major party. If he or Badenoch are the best they can do, what does it say about the rest?
Reposted
Chris Mason isn't angry with Reeves about misleading the public. He's angry that he wasn't kept in the loop and his weeks of projections and prophesies turned out to be embarrassingly wrong.
December 1, 2025 at 12:56 PM
Chris Mason isn't angry with Reeves about misleading the public. He's angry that he wasn't kept in the loop and his weeks of projections and prophesies turned out to be embarrassingly wrong.
Reposted
“Cuddly” Chris Mason “ telling” us he’s found a flaw in Rachel Reeves budget. FFS ,seriously ,who gives a flying fuck? Has any budget had this much scrutiny? Get your arses in to Reforms Russian links and Farages racism, real issues.
December 1, 2025 at 12:59 PM
“Cuddly” Chris Mason “ telling” us he’s found a flaw in Rachel Reeves budget. FFS ,seriously ,who gives a flying fuck? Has any budget had this much scrutiny? Get your arses in to Reforms Russian links and Farages racism, real issues.
Reposted
That cnut at the BBC, Chris Mason, thinks he’s speaking for me in the Rachel Reeves ‘lied’ manmade storm. Fuck off Chris.
December 1, 2025 at 1:59 PM
That cnut at the BBC, Chris Mason, thinks he’s speaking for me in the Rachel Reeves ‘lied’ manmade storm. Fuck off Chris.
Reposted
Absolutely flabbergasted!
Since when has Chris Mason BBC, who is supposed to report unbiased news, become the judge on whether the chancellor has misled the public?
Once again, on BBC news at 1 today, he was at it again...
Since when has Chris Mason BBC, who is supposed to report unbiased news, become the judge on whether the chancellor has misled the public?
Once again, on BBC news at 1 today, he was at it again...
December 1, 2025 at 2:23 PM
Absolutely flabbergasted!
Since when has Chris Mason BBC, who is supposed to report unbiased news, become the judge on whether the chancellor has misled the public?
Once again, on BBC news at 1 today, he was at it again...
Since when has Chris Mason BBC, who is supposed to report unbiased news, become the judge on whether the chancellor has misled the public?
Once again, on BBC news at 1 today, he was at it again...
Reposted
What on earth makes Chris Mason think it's his job to "call it"? (I'm reminded of Robert Peston's BBC editorial piece, three days before the 2015 election, which concluded that Ed Miliband hadn't apologized sufficiently for Labour's handling of the economy. Impartial, schmimpartial.)
December 1, 2025 at 3:22 PM
What on earth makes Chris Mason think it's his job to "call it"? (I'm reminded of Robert Peston's BBC editorial piece, three days before the 2015 election, which concluded that Ed Miliband hadn't apologized sufficiently for Labour's handling of the economy. Impartial, schmimpartial.)
Reposted
A reminder of how the BBC covered Boris Johnson's long record of lying, as being a "complicated relationship with the truth".
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-poli...
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-poli...
December 1, 2025 at 3:08 PM
A reminder of how the BBC covered Boris Johnson's long record of lying, as being a "complicated relationship with the truth".
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-poli...
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-poli...
Reposted
Had the misfortune of seeing Chris Mason on the lunchtime news pontificating on why "in his judgement" she has misled the public.
This from the man with no known opinion on Farage and gave free passes to Truss, Kwarteng, Johnson, Gove, Hancock, Hunt and Sunak. Ghastly little man
This from the man with no known opinion on Farage and gave free passes to Truss, Kwarteng, Johnson, Gove, Hancock, Hunt and Sunak. Ghastly little man
December 1, 2025 at 2:33 PM
Had the misfortune of seeing Chris Mason on the lunchtime news pontificating on why "in his judgement" she has misled the public.
This from the man with no known opinion on Farage and gave free passes to Truss, Kwarteng, Johnson, Gove, Hancock, Hunt and Sunak. Ghastly little man
This from the man with no known opinion on Farage and gave free passes to Truss, Kwarteng, Johnson, Gove, Hancock, Hunt and Sunak. Ghastly little man
Reposted
Now Chris Mason on the impartial BBC has pronounced Reeves guilty as charged. Apparently honesty and trust is a big thing. LOOK IN THE FUCKING MIRROR BBC.
December 1, 2025 at 1:35 PM
Now Chris Mason on the impartial BBC has pronounced Reeves guilty as charged. Apparently honesty and trust is a big thing. LOOK IN THE FUCKING MIRROR BBC.
Reposted
"It is my job, after a careful examination of the facts, to call it..." No it is not, Chris Mason! It is your job to report the facts and points of view on a hotly contested issue and leave me and other audience to make up their own minds! www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
Chris Mason: Why, in my judgement, Reeves was misleading on one specific point
The Chancellor chose not to share some information on tax receipts in an unusual press conference, given before the Budget.
www.bbc.co.uk
December 1, 2025 at 11:07 AM
"It is my job, after a careful examination of the facts, to call it..." No it is not, Chris Mason! It is your job to report the facts and points of view on a hotly contested issue and leave me and other audience to make up their own minds! www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
Reposted
Why is Chris Mason on the news saying that, in his judgement, the Chancellor had misled MPs? Isn't his job to report the news and let the viewers make up their own mind, rather than editorializing?
December 1, 2025 at 1:36 PM
Why is Chris Mason on the news saying that, in his judgement, the Chancellor had misled MPs? Isn't his job to report the news and let the viewers make up their own mind, rather than editorializing?
Reposted
Feel like using "careful" twice in the same sentence is a bit embarrassing.
December 1, 2025 at 1:18 PM
Feel like using "careful" twice in the same sentence is a bit embarrassing.
Reposted
Chris Mason has openly told viewers (BBC News at One) his personal view of Rachel Reeves. I do not watch the News and pay a licence fee to listen to the view of a man I don’t have any respect for. I want to form my own opinions and I’m quite capable of doing so. He overstepped the mark.
December 1, 2025 at 2:33 PM
Chris Mason has openly told viewers (BBC News at One) his personal view of Rachel Reeves. I do not watch the News and pay a licence fee to listen to the view of a man I don’t have any respect for. I want to form my own opinions and I’m quite capable of doing so. He overstepped the mark.
Reposted
We don’t want anyone’s “opinion” thanks very much Chris Mason. But fair and balanced facts would be a good start. You being the BBC political editor and such.
December 1, 2025 at 8:19 AM
We don’t want anyone’s “opinion” thanks very much Chris Mason. But fair and balanced facts would be a good start. You being the BBC political editor and such.
Reposted
Rather than Chris Mason crying salty tears as he so reluctantly castigated the Chancellor for not telling him everything, perhaps the obvious BBC editor should have been asked. I refer to the serious economics editor, Faisal Islam, who had many years at #SkyNews and #c4news.
#r4today
#r4today
December 1, 2025 at 8:40 AM
Reposted
Chris Mason: Why, in my judgement, Reeves was misleading on one specific point.
Do we give a flying f*** what Chris Mason of the BBC thinks?
Do we give a flying f*** what Chris Mason of the BBC thinks?
December 1, 2025 at 1:53 PM
Chris Mason: Why, in my judgement, Reeves was misleading on one specific point.
Do we give a flying f*** what Chris Mason of the BBC thinks?
Do we give a flying f*** what Chris Mason of the BBC thinks?
Reposted
Chris Mason presuming to make a call on my behalf. I wouldn't have him queue for a shared lavatory on my behalf.
No that's not *your* on *our behalf*. Your job is to report the story, presenting all sides fairly and then *we* call it. What Mason is saying here is fundamentally not what the bbc is for!
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
December 1, 2025 at 11:58 AM
Chris Mason presuming to make a call on my behalf. I wouldn't have him queue for a shared lavatory on my behalf.
Reposted
That Chris Mason is a smirking, smug little weasel, even worse than Kuenssberg. The BBC must get its political correspondents out of Reform’s waste bin.
December 1, 2025 at 7:57 AM
That Chris Mason is a smirking, smug little weasel, even worse than Kuenssberg. The BBC must get its political correspondents out of Reform’s waste bin.
Reposted
I'm "your listener", Chris Mason. I want to know why Boris Johnson isn't in jail, not whether Rachel Reeves left some details out of a few interviews. #r4today
December 1, 2025 at 7:14 AM
I'm "your listener", Chris Mason. I want to know why Boris Johnson isn't in jail, not whether Rachel Reeves left some details out of a few interviews. #r4today
Reposted
Indeed. This is not the BBC's job and to make it worse, in the same piece, Chris Mason again lurches into opinion and gives government carte blanche when he absolutely should not have!
No that's not *your* on *our behalf*. Your job is to report the story, presenting all sides fairly and then *we* call it. What Mason is saying here is fundamentally not what the bbc is for!
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
December 1, 2025 at 11:44 AM
Indeed. This is not the BBC's job and to make it worse, in the same piece, Chris Mason again lurches into opinion and gives government carte blanche when he absolutely should not have!