La Conquête du Panini
@botsnack.bsky.social
*tinker, tinker*
*klang*
*echoes to infinity*
(Mefite)
*klang*
*echoes to infinity*
(Mefite)
No fucking way
December 18, 2025 at 4:22 AM
No fucking way
It said small.
December 16, 2025 at 5:11 AM
It said small.
Gonna start a brand called "pick two"
or "pick three?"
*shrug*
or "pick three?"
*shrug*
December 15, 2025 at 5:56 AM
Gonna start a brand called "pick two"
or "pick three?"
*shrug*
or "pick three?"
*shrug*
December 12, 2025 at 10:13 PM
As a generally curious person, autodidact, and web-denizen, I CANNOT overstate how much LLMS+advertising have destroyed the promise of the web.
This goddam multi-page pablum replaced concise, coherent explanations of everything from kazoos to woodworking tools.
This goddam multi-page pablum replaced concise, coherent explanations of everything from kazoos to woodworking tools.
December 12, 2025 at 10:11 PM
As a generally curious person, autodidact, and web-denizen, I CANNOT overstate how much LLMS+advertising have destroyed the promise of the web.
This goddam multi-page pablum replaced concise, coherent explanations of everything from kazoos to woodworking tools.
This goddam multi-page pablum replaced concise, coherent explanations of everything from kazoos to woodworking tools.
Guess we'll see if tracks queries
December 12, 2025 at 8:34 PM
Guess we'll see if tracks queries
They're comparing it to the 10% drop mentioned just prior in the article.
I guess 36 isn't as bad as 32.
So tired of winning.
I guess 36 isn't as bad as 32.
So tired of winning.
December 11, 2025 at 7:57 PM
They're comparing it to the 10% drop mentioned just prior in the article.
I guess 36 isn't as bad as 32.
So tired of winning.
I guess 36 isn't as bad as 32.
So tired of winning.
So about that
December 11, 2025 at 4:20 AM
So about that
The porn-search equivalent of "Roll Tide"
December 10, 2025 at 8:48 PM
The porn-search equivalent of "Roll Tide"
Karens busy in the 17th century freaking out about Catholic soap
![Early soapmakers in the Mediterranean area did not have easy access to laurel oil and therefore dropped it from their formulations, thereby creating an olive oil-based soap now known as Castile soap. Castile soap is so called because it was produced on a large scale in the territories of the Crown of Castile, from where it was exported to numerous places in Europe, mainly during the Modern Age. Although the Crown of Castile was not the only producer of this type of soap, it was its producer par excellence.
In the 17th century, the soap caused controversy in England, since it supplanted the unnamed local soap after the Spanish Catholic manufacturers purchased the monopoly on the soap from the cash-strapped Carolinian government. Its ties to Catholicism caused a public-relations campaign to be established, featuring washerwomen showing how much more effective local soaps were than Castile soap. The sale of a monopoly in Protestant England to a Catholic company caused a great uproar, ending with the Castile soap company eventually being stripped of the monopoly.[4]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:lse3wrjzwkiloknzt3cuedbb/bafkreicdayip266fm5hldn6lu7b7wwyxuxrvcivaxmjjeqeufuvfd4ajfe@jpeg)
December 10, 2025 at 8:41 PM
Karens busy in the 17th century freaking out about Catholic soap
NO BREAK GREATER THAN 4 HRS YESTERDAY
December 10, 2025 at 12:27 PM
NO BREAK GREATER THAN 4 HRS YESTERDAY
December 10, 2025 at 8:41 AM
I'm big into nostalgia, but somehow I find this stuff to be toxic.
It's just a hunk of garbage waiting for the landfill.
Mass market hipsterism.
It's just a hunk of garbage waiting for the landfill.
Mass market hipsterism.
December 2, 2025 at 7:07 PM
I'm big into nostalgia, but somehow I find this stuff to be toxic.
It's just a hunk of garbage waiting for the landfill.
Mass market hipsterism.
It's just a hunk of garbage waiting for the landfill.
Mass market hipsterism.
These "composite PFPs" are baffling. They *inherently* change based on contents, so don't serve as a visual anchor! Before there was an *icon* for new releases.
Between this design and various buggy issues, I'm kinda curious about trying out something else these days, maybe FOSS.
Between this design and various buggy issues, I'm kinda curious about trying out something else these days, maybe FOSS.
November 29, 2025 at 9:31 PM
These "composite PFPs" are baffling. They *inherently* change based on contents, so don't serve as a visual anchor! Before there was an *icon* for new releases.
Between this design and various buggy issues, I'm kinda curious about trying out something else these days, maybe FOSS.
Between this design and various buggy issues, I'm kinda curious about trying out something else these days, maybe FOSS.
@pocketcasts.com made the most glaringly obvious UX regression I can recall.
The sparkly symbol is honestly confusing, as it's becoming the de facto AI symbol, yet this just a settings page.
Granted, it was weird before, and I guess search is welcome.
The sparkly symbol is honestly confusing, as it's becoming the de facto AI symbol, yet this just a settings page.
Granted, it was weird before, and I guess search is welcome.
November 29, 2025 at 9:31 PM
@pocketcasts.com made the most glaringly obvious UX regression I can recall.
The sparkly symbol is honestly confusing, as it's becoming the de facto AI symbol, yet this just a settings page.
Granted, it was weird before, and I guess search is welcome.
The sparkly symbol is honestly confusing, as it's becoming the de facto AI symbol, yet this just a settings page.
Granted, it was weird before, and I guess search is welcome.
Learning things on Wikipedia
![^ Free the Games Fund
In July 2013, Ouya announced the "Free the Games Fund", a scheme to help fund developers, where Ouya would match any Kickstarter campaign if a minimum target of $50,000 was reached, and provided the game remained Ouya exclusive for six months. [25] Suspicions were raised concerning the first two games to reach the target. Commentators noticed the small number of backers each pledging a high value amount, the large number of those who had never backed a project before, as well as the use of duplicate names and avatars that included those of celebrities. [64] This led some to suggest that the projects were artificially inflating their project's backing in order to receive extra money from Ouya. In addition, one project had a backer whose identity appeared to be taken from that of a missing person's case. [64]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:lse3wrjzwkiloknzt3cuedbb/bafkreieziargy6r6qqwjrx5ooaptwshhixnhnmmcpjspcbme5w2qlcvtoq@jpeg)
November 29, 2025 at 11:44 AM
Learning things on Wikipedia
'tis a random core sample and durometer test.
Wonder what the target shore value is.
Wonder what the target shore value is.
November 27, 2025 at 7:08 PM
'tis a random core sample and durometer test.
Wonder what the target shore value is.
Wonder what the target shore value is.
By May of 2005, they were downgraded to being "sometimes" known as the "fab four of christian rock."
And as of 03:06, 14 December 2005, truth won out and their wikipedia article ceased to mention comparison to the Beatles.
I'm not a huge Beatles fan, but I mean, come the fuck on.
And as of 03:06, 14 December 2005, truth won out and their wikipedia article ceased to mention comparison to the Beatles.
I'm not a huge Beatles fan, but I mean, come the fuck on.
November 26, 2025 at 8:26 PM
By May of 2005, they were downgraded to being "sometimes" known as the "fab four of christian rock."
And as of 03:06, 14 December 2005, truth won out and their wikipedia article ceased to mention comparison to the Beatles.
I'm not a huge Beatles fan, but I mean, come the fuck on.
And as of 03:06, 14 December 2005, truth won out and their wikipedia article ceased to mention comparison to the Beatles.
I'm not a huge Beatles fan, but I mean, come the fuck on.