Currently living the consequences of the intersection of fun and work. Not a fan tbh
Thats the thing about games like this, Stellaris, CK3 - folk just rush one tech tree and it's so unbalanced that they win
Needs patched
Thats the thing about games like this, Stellaris, CK3 - folk just rush one tech tree and it's so unbalanced that they win
Needs patched
But an AI pointing this same thing out? Genius level stuff, so useful
But an AI pointing this same thing out? Genius level stuff, so useful
1. That information was there
2. That it said what staff think it said
1. That information was there
2. That it said what staff think it said
Its socialism, but under a single worldwide king appointed directly by God (not the new testament one, the one that smites, turns people to salt, makes bets with Satan about people's faith etc)
You should ask them about it next time
Its socialism, but under a single worldwide king appointed directly by God (not the new testament one, the one that smites, turns people to salt, makes bets with Satan about people's faith etc)
You should ask them about it next time
So righting the Labour ship in this model would involve electing people to power who are not supported by the old guard, like the PLP, no?
So righting the Labour ship in this model would involve electing people to power who are not supported by the old guard, like the PLP, no?
Not convinced she would win that tbh
Not convinced she would win that tbh
When GenAI fixes that and lets me say "Muppet Godzilla that runs like Tom Cruise attacks New York, and gets beat by the Ghostbusters" then I'll be a happy man
When GenAI fixes that and lets me say "Muppet Godzilla that runs like Tom Cruise attacks New York, and gets beat by the Ghostbusters" then I'll be a happy man
"ChatGPT, This scene in Titanic is wrong. Rose is stupid and selfish. There is enough room on the door for Jack. Show me an ending where she moves over and lets him on. Plus the boat doesn't sink and put aliens in it too."
"ChatGPT, This scene in Titanic is wrong. Rose is stupid and selfish. There is enough room on the door for Jack. Show me an ending where she moves over and lets him on. Plus the boat doesn't sink and put aliens in it too."
"This paper does not meet the marking criteria therefore has not been awarded a pass.
However, chin up, you are now qualified to rewrite welfare rules for the UK Government"
"This paper does not meet the marking criteria therefore has not been awarded a pass.
However, chin up, you are now qualified to rewrite welfare rules for the UK Government"
On the plus side, I won't need to update my profile on here till at least 2027
On the plus side, I won't need to update my profile on here till at least 2027
He's not going fumble this chance
He's not going fumble this chance
Imagine this hologram opening with
"WELCOME TO THE NAE-SHIT SHERLOCK SCHOOL OF POLICY -MAKING"
"My name is Pope Bananas V and I'll be your lecturer"
Imagine this hologram opening with
"WELCOME TO THE NAE-SHIT SHERLOCK SCHOOL OF POLICY -MAKING"
"My name is Pope Bananas V and I'll be your lecturer"
That nitty gritty is inevitably the stuff that people used to complain about and happend "at the fringe"
It's all fringe, it seems and that is what they want to read
That nitty gritty is inevitably the stuff that people used to complain about and happend "at the fringe"
It's all fringe, it seems and that is what they want to read
With something like
"I may, in most cases, have read the regulations except in the cases where I didn't want to"
Normally have actually read, and understood, the regulations
With something like
"I may, in most cases, have read the regulations except in the cases where I didn't want to"
Normally have actually read, and understood, the regulations
Because I read it as saying the messages aren't cutting through, because the narrative has been captured on takes that are resistant to traditional political messaging
The call is to change the messaging, isn't it?
Because I read it as saying the messages aren't cutting through, because the narrative has been captured on takes that are resistant to traditional political messaging
The call is to change the messaging, isn't it?
Both say public narrative has been captured by emotional driven messaging and responding with "things will better some time in the future, once us serious politicians do serious politics " is pointless in face of that
Both say public narrative has been captured by emotional driven messaging and responding with "things will better some time in the future, once us serious politicians do serious politics " is pointless in face of that
It's Vibes all the way down.
It isn't what has been done that matters, it's the vibes about what has been done that drive the vibes about what should be done
It's Vibes all the way down.
It isn't what has been done that matters, it's the vibes about what has been done that drive the vibes about what should be done