The nyt itself provides the gateway from fringe radicalism directly into the mainstream
The nyt itself provides the gateway from fringe radicalism directly into the mainstream
He’s ranting about “prosocial” “antisocial” behavior or somesuch
He’s ranting about “prosocial” “antisocial” behavior or somesuch
This is the level of rigor he and his eugenics pals employ.
This is the level of rigor he and his eugenics pals employ.
This guy, an avowed Nazi named Jordan Lasker, gives it his full endorsement.
This guy, an avowed Nazi named Jordan Lasker, gives it his full endorsement.
“Useful idiots!”
Yep, there’s an idiot in this exchange but she is anything but useful.
“Useful idiots!”
Yep, there’s an idiot in this exchange but she is anything but useful.
A couple of impressions. Healy seems to be saying that, really, Mamdani was the source, not the racist who provided the foundational info to the nyt and that the nyt used to confront the candidate. That’s pretty contorted logic🧵
A couple of impressions. Healy seems to be saying that, really, Mamdani was the source, not the racist who provided the foundational info to the nyt and that the nyt used to confront the candidate. That’s pretty contorted logic🧵
Consumed by hate, unmoored by principle? Rowling embodies the nyt’s own animus.
Consumed by hate, unmoored by principle? Rowling embodies the nyt’s own animus.