Blayne Haggart
banner
bhaggart.bsky.social
Blayne Haggart
@bhaggart.bsky.social
Professor, Political Science, Brock University
Knowledge governance, IPE, Sydney Swans tragic

Co-author, with Natasha Tusikov, The New Knowledge: Information, Data and the Remaking of Global Power (Bloomsbury, 2023). Open Access.
* Solomon here is speaking nonsense. The rate and direction of innovation is shaped by social factors, including regulations, laws, norms and the structure of the economy. In other words, it's shaped by society and culture.
But this isn't a policy conversation; he's trying to sell a monorail.
November 27, 2025 at 3:36 AM
Back to the list with some bedroom folk pop at #36. An almost unbearably sad song of childhood loss and heartbreak from Melbourne's Michael Vince Moin (2021). The song itself was the final release from what was a very special band.

#best100 #MusicSky

youtu.be/vXVgXo79_9U?...
Tram Cops - Sunny
YouTube video by Bedroom Fidelity
youtu.be
November 26, 2025 at 8:32 PM
Reposted by Blayne Haggart
In 2019, TikTok admitted to suppressing the content of fat, disabled, and queer users. In 2020 they claim a “glitch” caused the suppression of George Floyd content.

Sora exists to manufacture and disseminate racism, misogyny, and misogynoir at scale.

These systems are operating as intended.
November 26, 2025 at 12:17 PM
Trump’s 2016 election should’ve put the question of networked sovereignty on the Canadian military’s agenda. From this report, it’s not clear that it did. And in 2025, failing to address the elephant in the room, even if only to dismiss concerns, is inexcusable.
November 26, 2025 at 11:39 AM
Would love to know how “upgradability” was assessed — likely related to software, I’m guessing. Thinking in terms of networked power and sovereignty should remind us that software upgradability is a double-edged sword: possible better future performance, but your vendor could brick your plane.
November 26, 2025 at 11:39 AM
Lavoie is also correct to note that Carney is simply recycling Harper-era ideas. Does this blast from the past make sense in 2025? I don’t think so, but more to the point, Canadians need to debate the issue. The stakes couldn’t be higher. We need a Royal Commission.
Open letter to the next prime minister: We need a royal commission on Canada’s future
(Version française disponible ici) Sign up for A Stronger Canada for The Trump Era. A temporary newsletter with the latest Canada-U.S. analyses from Policy Options. There is no longer any room for dou...
policyoptions.irpp.org
November 26, 2025 at 11:11 AM
This morning I ran a simulation of a parliamentary committee examining Bill C-63 for my global internet governance class, and several of the student witnesses/MPs suggested similar amendments for social media as well.
(Great exercise; highly recommend.)
November 25, 2025 at 5:59 PM
“Sugar daddy federalism” does seem an apt phrase to describe the current state of Team Canada.
November 25, 2025 at 12:47 PM
Reposted by Blayne Haggart
This demonstrates again that the fragile "Team Canada" spirit rests on a vague idea without any substantial meaning, let alone institutional foundation.

And it will further undermine effective intergovernmental coordination. 2026 is going to be interesting, and I am afraid not in a good way.
November 25, 2025 at 12:10 PM
“Insurers increasingly view AI models’ outputs as too unpredictable and opaque to insure, … “It’s too much of a black box.””

Uncertainty and opacity are unavoidable features of generative AI. These are problems that you can’t engineer away.
No wonder insurers are taking a pass.

Gift link:
Insurers retreat from AI cover as risk of multibillion-dollar claims mounts
AIG, Great American and WR Berkley seek permission to limit liability from AI agents and chatbots
on.ft.com
November 25, 2025 at 11:50 AM