Benjamin Jullien
@benjullien.bsky.social
Doing comms around how climate impacts affect the economy, and how economics addresses that, with GSCC Network.
Formerly at Les Echos, La Tribune, McKinsey&Co.
Born 331ppm
Formerly at Les Echos, La Tribune, McKinsey&Co.
Born 331ppm
Not sure what's most worrying: reading this (and in the WSJ), or finding out nobody seems to care
Seen from Europe, the US has become a banana republic...
Seen from Europe, the US has become a banana republic...
October 30, 2025 at 4:43 PM
Not sure what's most worrying: reading this (and in the WSJ), or finding out nobody seems to care
Seen from Europe, the US has become a banana republic...
Seen from Europe, the US has become a banana republic...
I fixed this for @theguardian.com
When TRAINS are pricier than PLANES...
"If trains and planes factored in the social cost of carbon, a train from Barcelona to London would cost just couple more euros, but it would make the flight nearly five times more expensive"
When TRAINS are pricier than PLANES...
"If trains and planes factored in the social cost of carbon, a train from Barcelona to London would cost just couple more euros, but it would make the flight nearly five times more expensive"
October 23, 2025 at 11:20 AM
I fixed this for @theguardian.com
When TRAINS are pricier than PLANES...
"If trains and planes factored in the social cost of carbon, a train from Barcelona to London would cost just couple more euros, but it would make the flight nearly five times more expensive"
When TRAINS are pricier than PLANES...
"If trains and planes factored in the social cost of carbon, a train from Barcelona to London would cost just couple more euros, but it would make the flight nearly five times more expensive"
no comment
(Illustration: Chris Riddell/The Observer)
(Illustration: Chris Riddell/The Observer)
January 13, 2025 at 3:11 PM
no comment
(Illustration: Chris Riddell/The Observer)
(Illustration: Chris Riddell/The Observer)
The authors don't mention "mainstream" at all, they refer to "previous estimates" cited below.
What's clear is that their SCC of $1056 is almost 6 times the EPA number of $185, which can be considered as a prominent "previous estimate", I guess
What's clear is that their SCC of $1056 is almost 6 times the EPA number of $185, which can be considered as a prominent "previous estimate", I guess
May 15, 2024 at 9:49 AM
The authors don't mention "mainstream" at all, they refer to "previous estimates" cited below.
What's clear is that their SCC of $1056 is almost 6 times the EPA number of $185, which can be considered as a prominent "previous estimate", I guess
What's clear is that their SCC of $1056 is almost 6 times the EPA number of $185, which can be considered as a prominent "previous estimate", I guess