Brandi Bennett
@bbennettesq.bsky.social
Privacy and Tech Attorney | I write the things no one reads. Click "Yes" to accept.
Yet.
homer simpson and bart simpson from the simpsons
Alt: homer simpson and bart simpson from the simpsons
media.tenor.com
November 27, 2025 at 5:34 PM
Yet.
This might be the dumbest skeet I've ever seen.
November 26, 2025 at 11:22 PM
This might be the dumbest skeet I've ever seen.
More Everything First Amendment legal arguments. Sigh.
November 26, 2025 at 9:25 PM
More Everything First Amendment legal arguments. Sigh.
I'd bet on perplexity. 🤷♀️
November 26, 2025 at 4:02 PM
I'd bet on perplexity. 🤷♀️
Ice traitors can enjoy the sub freezing temps this week.
November 26, 2025 at 7:30 AM
Ice traitors can enjoy the sub freezing temps this week.
@kathleenthelaw.bsky.social just sayin
November 26, 2025 at 6:17 AM
@kathleenthelaw.bsky.social just sayin
Only the best people. Deplorables was too kind.
November 26, 2025 at 6:03 AM
Only the best people. Deplorables was too kind.
My imagination and the phrasing here is taking me to "he's fighting a custody battle and weaponized his family connection to ICE to win it."
Note how he never mentions any concern for the mother of his child? Clearly not together anymore.
Note how he never mentions any concern for the mother of his child? Clearly not together anymore.
November 26, 2025 at 5:58 AM
My imagination and the phrasing here is taking me to "he's fighting a custody battle and weaponized his family connection to ICE to win it."
Note how he never mentions any concern for the mother of his child? Clearly not together anymore.
Note how he never mentions any concern for the mother of his child? Clearly not together anymore.
Gauntlet definitely thrown.
November 26, 2025 at 5:30 AM
Gauntlet definitely thrown.
Reposted by Brandi Bennett
This sure seems like a deliberate choice to dare Boasberg into trying to do something against Noem, which they expect would get slapped down.
"insofar as the Court has inquired into the identities of the decisionmaking officials for purposes of making a potential criminal referral, the actions were taken by DHS (through Secretary Noem) after being formally advised about compliance with this Court’s order" by both DHS and DOJ counsel.
![Accordingly, the Government maintains that its actions did not violate the Court’s
order—certainly not with the clarity required for criminal contempt—and no further proceedings
are warranted or appropriate. Indeed, the mere fact that Judge Katsas agreed with Defendants’
interpretation of the TRO means that the order could not have been so “clear and decisive” that it
left “no doubt about what it require[d] to be done,” as criminal contempt requires. United States
v. Joyce, 498 F.2d 592, 596 (7th Cir. 1974); see also Ford v. Kammerer, 450 F.2d 279, 280 (3d Cir.
1971) (“long-standing, salutary rule in contempt cases is that ambiguities and omissions in orders
redound to the benefit of the person charged with contempt”); United States ex rel. Yelverton v.
Fed. Ins. Co., 831 F.3d 585, 587 (D.C. Cir. 2016) (same).
10. Nevertheless, insofar as the Court has inquired into the identities of the decisionmaking officials for purposes of making a potential criminal referral, the actions were taken by
DHS (through Secretary Noem) after being formally advised about compliance with this Court’s
order both by DOJ leadership and the Acting General Counsel of DHS.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:qqdqgzpqwyho4cxzso62m54q/bafkreieabw7jaju4xufouskydmfdiwrac2pwmdl6rc24ecurqwvnxsgngi@jpeg)
November 26, 2025 at 1:57 AM
This sure seems like a deliberate choice to dare Boasberg into trying to do something against Noem, which they expect would get slapped down.
No. They never look back and admit they were wrong. Now there's a story to be written.
November 26, 2025 at 5:01 AM
No. They never look back and admit they were wrong. Now there's a story to be written.
I've always found In N Out wildly overrated.
November 26, 2025 at 4:59 AM
I've always found In N Out wildly overrated.
This picture looks like elder abuse.
November 26, 2025 at 4:58 AM
This picture looks like elder abuse.
My California blasphemy is being a bigger fan of Habit Burger than In N Out.
November 26, 2025 at 4:57 AM
My California blasphemy is being a bigger fan of Habit Burger than In N Out.
Performative nonsense.
November 25, 2025 at 8:14 PM
Performative nonsense.
Yep. I think the closest we got was someone leaving the butter knife in the sandwich but otherwise getting an edible sandwich. It was a long time ago.
November 25, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Yep. I think the closest we got was someone leaving the butter knife in the sandwich but otherwise getting an edible sandwich. It was a long time ago.