Avi Zevin
banner
azevin.bsky.social
Avi Zevin
@azevin.bsky.social
energy and climate law and policy. Partner at Roselle LLP (www.rosellellp.com). Until recently: Special Assistant to the President for Clean Energy Implementation, before that Deputy GC at US Department of Energy. in a band (currently on hiatus).
Share it here when you're ready. Definitely need more Approps law scholarship!
September 1, 2025 at 10:15 PM
and yet also a large part of recent cost increases is on the distribution side.
September 1, 2025 at 6:33 PM
Makes sense. Seems like then there is a way to highlight clean energy support while loudly opposing certain energy restrictions.

And maybe opens door to characterizing GOP anti-climate obsession (anti-solar/wind) as leading to cost increases for purely ideological reasons (GOP's version of "woke")
August 18, 2025 at 3:07 PM
And to be clear, I'm talking about energy/climate qua IRA not opposition to fraking. Though of course that then raises the question of why anti-climate is "good" rather than like Senimas corporatist heterodoxy.

Feels like there's just a lot of handwaving on that issue in particular.
August 18, 2025 at 2:40 PM
One piece that I'd love to see more discussion here is why "climate" and "energy" have been consistently thrown into the category of helpful to take heterodox positions. They're not social issues (or, I guess if they are that raises the second order question of what is social vs econ).
August 18, 2025 at 2:40 PM
Very underdeveloped area of academic legal inquiry, imo. Looking forward
August 3, 2025 at 7:10 PM
August 1, 2025 at 12:31 PM
Um... Check my bio. I'm talking about chargers literally at the White House.
July 31, 2025 at 11:40 PM
Such a doctrinal perspective Madison. It's that the make-up of the Court that created Loper will lead to a different outcome.
July 31, 2025 at 6:19 PM
This report is just a bunch of warmed over 10 years old climate skeptic talking points.

bsky.app/profile/blka...
This Energy Department report is cited nearly two dozen times in the EPA's rollback of the endangerment finding and some of the claims are, well, let's look at a few of them
I can't imagine there will be any problems with this summary of climate science
July 30, 2025 at 12:15 AM
😡
July 29, 2025 at 10:50 PM
Saying otherwise is wrong. And saying otherwise by way of official government regulatory action is contrary to law.
July 29, 2025 at 11:33 AM
But, for the record, greenhouse gases significantly contribute to dangerous climate change. Lowering US emissions will be meaningful to Americans and the world, directly and by way of what they mean for technological and international leadership.
July 29, 2025 at 11:33 AM
One final note. The EO speaks of the importance of transmission (and specifically high voltage transmission). This is extremely correct. We need much more for data centers, reliability etc.

But it's quite ironic to highlight the importance of high voltage transmission today of all days.
July 23, 2025 at 11:24 PM
One nugget: I think this is the first time a specific threshold is set for the percent of federal $ that triggers NEPA (50%), though many questions remain for how one calculates this (particularly in the context of loans, tax credits, etc).
July 23, 2025 at 11:19 PM