Atomsk's Sanakan
atomskssanakan.bsky.social
Atomsk's Sanakan
@atomskssanakan.bsky.social
To prevent this username from being taken.
https://x.com/AtomsksSanakan

Christian;
Science, Denialism Debunked, Philosophy, Manga, Death Metal, Pokémon, Immunology FTW;
Fan of Bradford Hill + Richard Joyce;
Consilience of evidence
Some examples in that thread:

- Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: NIH director
- Dr. Martin Kulldorff: ACIP member
- Michael Caputo: former HHS assistant secretary for public affairs
- Paul Alexander: former Trump administration science adviser at HHS

x.com/AtomsksSanak...
threadreaderapp.com/thread/19976...
December 7, 2025 at 6:30 PM
Reposted by Atomsk's Sanakan
Some central problems with Ridley's lukewarmism:
1) underestimating warming + sea level rise acceleration
2) dangerous warming happens decades earlier than lukewarmism predicts

For point 1:
45:48 - 58:07
www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-gd...

For point 2:
1:13:18 - 1:27:52
www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-gd...
Matt Ridley is Lying to You About Climate Change
YouTube video by Professor Dave Explains
www.youtube.com
October 8, 2025 at 12:54 AM
1) Yes
2) Usually, unless it was something like an allergic reaction to a vaccine component not seen in SARS-CoV-2, etc.
December 7, 2025 at 1:51 PM
The PubPeer thread below lists peer-reviewed studies on the number of deaths from SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

TL;DR
SARS-CoV-2 vaccines saved around 3 orders of magnitude more lives than they took.

pubpeer.com/publications...
x.com/AtomsksSanak...
PubPeer - Global estimates of lives and life-years saved by COVID-19 v...
There are comments on PubPeer for publication: Global estimates of lives and life-years saved by COVID-19 vaccination during 2020-2024 (2024)
pubpeer.com
November 29, 2025 at 9:39 PM
Thread below listing Ridley's false claims across science topics.

There are over 50 such claims.

threadreaderapp.com/thread/19869...
[ bsky.app/profile/atom...
x.com/AtomsksSanak... ]

archive.is/zpiYp
November 11, 2025 at 3:52 PM
It's reached almost comical levels with Ridley.

bsky.app/profile/atom...
Non-exhaustive list of Ridley's false claims across science topics:

threadreaderapp.com/thread/19869...

x.com/AtomsksSanak...
November 8, 2025 at 1:47 PM
Non-exhaustive list of Ridley's false claims across science topics:

threadreaderapp.com/thread/19869...

x.com/AtomsksSanak...
November 8, 2025 at 1:47 PM
They're largely led along by their paranoid biases, as much on pandemic origins as on other topics.

For example, that's why they fell for an obvious transphobic hoax that suited their prejudices.

www.yahoo.com/news/article...

bsky.app/profile/atom...
bsky.app/profile/atom...
November 2, 2025 at 1:58 PM
Thank you for pointing it out, and for providing an infilled analysis before that pre-print came out.

Hopefully that + uncertainty estimates are enough for inclusion in IPCC AR7.

Does anyone know if @micefearboggis.bsky.social was updated on this?

diagrammonkey.wordpress.com/2024/11/22/i...
October 23, 2025 at 9:06 PM
In retrospect, I should have asked for a comparison relative to 1850-1900 for DCENT or infilled DCENT from @brucettcalvert.bsky.social.

But I don't think ahead. 🤦‍♂️

doi.org/10.26050/WDC...
doi.org/10.1038/s415...

diagrammonkey.wordpress.com/2024/11/22/i...
[ www.realclimate.org/index.php/ar... ]
October 21, 2025 at 8:01 PM
Yup. That's true on climatology, virology, infectious disease epidemiology, nutritional epidemiology, etc.

bsky.app/profile/atom...
October 15, 2025 at 11:40 PM
He's pandering to cranks + conspiracists, as usual.

x.com/AtomsksSanak...

t.co/yK9tWPMKMo
October 13, 2025 at 8:47 PM
Reposted by Atomsk's Sanakan
Here (1880-1899 baseline should be close enough, I hope?).
October 13, 2025 at 7:09 AM
It is helpful, thank you. I should have clarified why I asked for 1850-1900. My mistake.

It was to compare to the pre-industrial baseline used in the Paris agreement, as you likely know:
climate.copernicus.eu/climate-indi...

But I think this works.

www.realclimate.org/index.php/ar...
October 13, 2025 at 12:46 PM
Thank you
October 11, 2025 at 12:41 AM
Sorry to bug you, and feel free to ignore this request if you don't have time.

Is it possible to get a version of this graph where the y-axis is relative to the pre-industrial baselines of 1850-1900?

Likely not since GISTEMP only goes back to 1880?

www.realclimate.org/index.php/ar...
October 10, 2025 at 11:52 PM
Ridley also misinformed on vaccines by using the nirvana fallacy.

"Vaccines don't stop infections"
x.com/mattwridley/...

x.com/gorskon/stat...

Ridley:
“the Cochrane Collaboration, a non-profit research group”
www.mattridley.co.uk/blog/the-rea...

Cochrane:
www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10....
October 8, 2025 at 2:12 PM
Ridley uses lab leak as an excuse for him being repeatedly wrong about the pandemic. 🤷‍♂️

“[…] I have been wrong about a lot during this pandemic.”
www.spectator.co.uk/article/stre...
[ archive.is/BlTYx#select... ]

1:38:02 to 1:40:06 :
www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-gd...
Matt Ridley is Lying to You About Climate Change
YouTube video by Professor Dave Explains
www.youtube.com
October 8, 2025 at 1:43 PM
Many prominent political conservatives endorse lukewarmism.

So when will they address its falsification?

x.com/AtomsksSanak...

Oren Cass:
www.nationalreview.com/2017/06/clim...

Ross Douthat:
nytimes.com/2017/06/03/opinion/sunday/neither-hot-nor-cold-on-climate.html
[ archive.is/NtNhe#select... ]
October 8, 2025 at 1:01 AM
Some central problems with Ridley's lukewarmism:
1) underestimating warming + sea level rise acceleration
2) dangerous warming happens decades earlier than lukewarmism predicts

For point 1:
45:48 - 58:07
www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-gd...

For point 2:
1:13:18 - 1:27:52
www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-gd...
Matt Ridley is Lying to You About Climate Change
YouTube video by Professor Dave Explains
www.youtube.com
October 8, 2025 at 12:54 AM
October 7, 2025 at 11:34 PM