Kristopher North
banner
amethystmedicus.bsky.social
Kristopher North
@amethystmedicus.bsky.social
Humanist and former NAFO Fella who fled Xitter.
November 27, 2025 at 7:20 PM
Ew
November 14, 2025 at 9:53 PM
Yes. As progressive were scorched across the ENTIRE western world.

Inflation still existed. Wealth concentration still got worse. That still equated to less money for normal people, even if we did "better than those other people"
November 3, 2025 at 10:11 PM
If you've got a light switch that didn't turn on the lights when you flipped it, that light switch didn't work.

Similarly, every defensive play is meant to prevent a score or a first down. And my brother on Christ, by definition, this play DID NOT WORK.

See the attached definition of "work"
October 16, 2025 at 12:05 AM
This actually has interesting implications for people with disordered thinking/dementia/brain injury etc. But that slope be slippery af

(Screenshot bc muting comments AND quote reskeets is pretty wild imo)
September 20, 2025 at 7:43 PM
Good question; in very broad strokes, they exaggerate ketogenesis and ketone reabsorption while suppressing endogenous insulin release (and supplemental insulin dosing) which keeps the patient in a prolonged insulin-deficient state.

The drug clears but the metabolic changes take ages to rebalance.
September 7, 2025 at 1:40 PM
Oh look, another "Russia has never ever ever been an evil Empire" propaganda troll.

You could at least wait until they take a break in between empiring attempts...
July 29, 2025 at 7:56 PM
July 13, 2025 at 3:35 AM
Forgot to include this:
July 12, 2025 at 1:42 PM
And nobody is saying cancelling your Netflix is going to cut taxes for the rich.

They're saying cutting taxes for the rich will cut taxes for the rich.

BECAUSE THEY'RE CUTTING TAXES FOR THE RICH.

The "transfer of wealth" part is related to increased insurance premiums and care facility closures
July 3, 2025 at 6:55 AM
Took a quick scroll of the topic feed just now: maybe 1% of these are positive, and that's probably being generous.
June 29, 2025 at 11:49 PM
"Star light, star bright, first star I see I'll fight"
June 23, 2025 at 5:11 PM
My cat has a book recommendation
June 18, 2025 at 2:31 AM
This was 3.2% of the US population based on last year's census.

0.3% to go.
June 16, 2025 at 12:08 AM
Glad you agree
June 11, 2025 at 2:09 PM
Get a cat. Less maintenance, easier to sell to the wife. Some of them act like dogs. Ours plays fetch and walks on a harness.

Soul-mated so hard with this little fucker. Yes he breaks stuff but he also snuggles like a champ when he's not breaking stuff.
June 9, 2025 at 4:57 PM
All anybody reads now is the headline.

Consumers, not readers. Readers call and complain. Consumers consume and move on.

This analysis of yours is basically survivorship bias: the ones who survive the bad headlines are the only ones 'making it home' to complain.
June 4, 2025 at 1:59 AM
The numbers now are more comparable to WW2 when Russia lost 6.75 million troops. And it could handle those losses because it had the resources of the entire Soviet Union to steal and horde for itself after the war.
May 16, 2025 at 8:49 PM
And here's why that's really really stupid:
May 16, 2025 at 8:49 PM
I've honestly been surprised that the front lines haven't looked like WW2 landing sites at any point, especially in areas where drones are scarce.

Balloons can hang nets, jammers, repeaters, surveillance...
May 11, 2025 at 9:19 PM
Well I was going to lay down and stretch my neck for a minute but now I guess I'm taking a nap
April 14, 2025 at 6:45 PM
It's pay-to-play here, for everything. Including transit when most of the country needs to own a car and many can't pay to repair or replace it if it breaks.
April 5, 2025 at 8:13 PM
Look in not trying to contradict you or take the sting out of your anger. The third of the country that voted against all this is also incredibly pissed off. But your math misses a key point:

We don't take care of our citizens. The standard of living in the US may be high, but we're on our own.
April 5, 2025 at 8:09 PM
Trump's actually #2 on this one. OPEC started it earlier in the week and doubled down despite the tariff reaction. Could also be trying to appease Trump who exempted oil and gas already - but I think this is more likely:

www.cnbc.com/2025/04/04/w...
April 4, 2025 at 6:07 PM
"We are currently clean on opsec"
March 26, 2025 at 11:33 PM