Venice, easy :-)

That’s the thing. I can tolerate that somehow, but for ECs this is a killer.
Thank god we preprinted both papers, poor consolation but better than nothing!

Same postdoc, another paper: sat on the Editor’s desk for 5+ months, then came back with a desk rejection for being ‘out of scope.’ Five months… for a desk rejection??

Agreed! Postdoc's paper in our group: submitted early July. Editor emails: "paper is going out but needs an extra doc (declaration)". Doc sent. Then silence. After 120 days, status is still ‘Under evaluation’. I ask for clarifications. Reply: Still assigning referees, reviewer suggestions welcome.😱

The DEM is much less exciting.

🌊 A wednesday full of science @ #RCEM2025
From fascinating talks on coasts, rivers & estuaries to the second poster session, has been packed with insights and exchange. 💡🖼️

👏 Thanks to all presenters for pushing the boundaries of our field—discussion & collaboration are thriving!

So proud of Michael!! 😎

This work was a collaboration with @alvitello.bsky.social at @unipd.bsky.social and A. Ielpi and @ubcokanagan.bsky.social

Check also:

- Perspective by J. Pizzuto: doi.org/10.1126/scie...

- Stanford’s press release: sustainability.stanford.edu/news/rise-pl...

Showed this slide in class and it didn't elicit a single giggle or guffaw. Something's up.

Could you please share that? So I can possibly better guide grad students interested in going abroad?
Thx