Alfred Nobel
@alfrednobel.bsky.social
Read the BBS article: "Core Perception", Dawei Bai e.a.
It captures exactly the paradigm shift that underlies my entire research program — the very shift I have spent the past decade trying to implement.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nj-Mol/research
It captures exactly the paradigm shift that underlies my entire research program — the very shift I have spent the past decade trying to implement.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nj-Mol/research
Agree.
Self-driving cars will never occur. It is far too complex. See my research.
Only with 300 cameras and a set grid. But these cars we have already for 100+ years!!! We call them trains
Self-driving cars will never occur. It is far too complex. See my research.
Only with 300 cameras and a set grid. But these cars we have already for 100+ years!!! We call them trains
December 7, 2025 at 10:56 PM
Agree.
Self-driving cars will never occur. It is far too complex. See my research.
Only with 300 cameras and a set grid. But these cars we have already for 100+ years!!! We call them trains
Self-driving cars will never occur. It is far too complex. See my research.
Only with 300 cameras and a set grid. But these cars we have already for 100+ years!!! We call them trains
Agree.
Self-driving cars will never occur. It is far too complex. See my research.
Only with 300 cameras and a set grid. But these cars we have already for 100+ years!!! We call them trains
Self-driving cars will never occur. It is far too complex. See my research.
Only with 300 cameras and a set grid. But these cars we have already for 100+ years!!! We call them trains
December 7, 2025 at 10:55 PM
Agree.
Self-driving cars will never occur. It is far too complex. See my research.
Only with 300 cameras and a set grid. But these cars we have already for 100+ years!!! We call them trains
Self-driving cars will never occur. It is far too complex. See my research.
Only with 300 cameras and a set grid. But these cars we have already for 100+ years!!! We call them trains
Self-driving cars will never occur. It is far too complex. See my research.
Only with 300 cameras and a set grid. But these cars we have already for 100+ years!!! We call them trains
Only with 300 cameras and a set grid. But these cars we have already for 100+ years!!! We call them trains
December 7, 2025 at 10:55 PM
Self-driving cars will never occur. It is far too complex. See my research.
Only with 300 cameras and a set grid. But these cars we have already for 100+ years!!! We call them trains
Only with 300 cameras and a set grid. But these cars we have already for 100+ years!!! We call them trains
If you consider academia just a job, then you are the problem in nowadays science.
Please go away.
Please go away.
December 7, 2025 at 11:35 AM
If you consider academia just a job, then you are the problem in nowadays science.
Please go away.
Please go away.
Reid, Elliott, Kovacs, Knudson, Miller are famous biomechanic researchers in tennis. You can still read their work on THE tennis service....
December 7, 2025 at 11:30 AM
Reid, Elliott, Kovacs, Knudson, Miller are famous biomechanic researchers in tennis. You can still read their work on THE tennis service....
But everyday you reach for your coffee cup and you solely create an action trajectory shape, from the end-effectors, i.c. your fingertips and you jts execute that shape mediated by the cortical streams.
You have never planned and will never plan anything.
You have never planned and will never plan anything.
December 7, 2025 at 10:50 AM
But everyday you reach for your coffee cup and you solely create an action trajectory shape, from the end-effectors, i.c. your fingertips and you jts execute that shape mediated by the cortical streams.
You have never planned and will never plan anything.
You have never planned and will never plan anything.
No, you are not dumb.
And my products are clear.
It is your unwillingness to understand, your body is unwilling to understand it. You are entrenched, brainwashed from the first day you entered university. There is and there shall be a motor plan. Good luck with it.
And my products are clear.
It is your unwillingness to understand, your body is unwilling to understand it. You are entrenched, brainwashed from the first day you entered university. There is and there shall be a motor plan. Good luck with it.
December 7, 2025 at 10:50 AM
No, you are not dumb.
And my products are clear.
It is your unwillingness to understand, your body is unwilling to understand it. You are entrenched, brainwashed from the first day you entered university. There is and there shall be a motor plan. Good luck with it.
And my products are clear.
It is your unwillingness to understand, your body is unwilling to understand it. You are entrenched, brainwashed from the first day you entered university. There is and there shall be a motor plan. Good luck with it.
December 7, 2025 at 12:21 AM
point. One can maintain to say otherwise. No problem. As long as you know that I did inform you about it.
December 6, 2025 at 10:50 PM
point. One can maintain to say otherwise. No problem. As long as you know that I did inform you about it.
You will only be capable to ever understand this, if you start to see that 2 autonomous foci are present and executed within the egocentric action.
I provided several convincing articles and a videoclip but if you will not study them you will never understand my
I provided several convincing articles and a videoclip but if you will not study them you will never understand my
December 6, 2025 at 10:50 PM
You will only be capable to ever understand this, if you start to see that 2 autonomous foci are present and executed within the egocentric action.
I provided several convincing articles and a videoclip but if you will not study them you will never understand my
I provided several convincing articles and a videoclip but if you will not study them you will never understand my
No, it isn't the same.
The novum and the solution of the 100+ quest is that we do not plan any motor movement. All motoric (internal) movements follow the external action trajectory shape (which provides the essential tau-value (Lee).
The novum and the solution of the 100+ quest is that we do not plan any motor movement. All motoric (internal) movements follow the external action trajectory shape (which provides the essential tau-value (Lee).
December 6, 2025 at 10:50 PM
No, it isn't the same.
The novum and the solution of the 100+ quest is that we do not plan any motor movement. All motoric (internal) movements follow the external action trajectory shape (which provides the essential tau-value (Lee).
The novum and the solution of the 100+ quest is that we do not plan any motor movement. All motoric (internal) movements follow the external action trajectory shape (which provides the essential tau-value (Lee).
Hoi Dick,
Ik vind het moeilijk om de discussie te volgen, maar eigenlijk zeggen jullie toch dat jullie nog geen idee hebben hoe het werkt?
Ik vind het moeilijk om de discussie te volgen, maar eigenlijk zeggen jullie toch dat jullie nog geen idee hebben hoe het werkt?
December 6, 2025 at 5:51 PM
Hoi Dick,
Ik vind het moeilijk om de discussie te volgen, maar eigenlijk zeggen jullie toch dat jullie nog geen idee hebben hoe het werkt?
Ik vind het moeilijk om de discussie te volgen, maar eigenlijk zeggen jullie toch dat jullie nog geen idee hebben hoe het werkt?
And if cognition must be seen much more as perception.
The call for commentaries on our "Core Perception" paper is now live! We would love to know what you think about this new perspective on the nature of early emerging knowledge.
Details : www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Proposals due Dec 29!
The call for commentaries on our "Core Perception" paper is now live! We would love to know what you think about this new perspective on the nature of early emerging knowledge.
Details : www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Proposals due Dec 29!
Call for Commentary Proposals - “Core Perception”: Re-imagining Precocious Reaso
Call for Commentary Proposals - “Core Perception”: Re-imagining Precocious Reasoning as Sophisticated Perceiving
www.cambridge.org
December 6, 2025 at 5:14 PM
And if cognition must be seen much more as perception.
The call for commentaries on our "Core Perception" paper is now live! We would love to know what you think about this new perspective on the nature of early emerging knowledge.
Details : www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Proposals due Dec 29!
The call for commentaries on our "Core Perception" paper is now live! We would love to know what you think about this new perspective on the nature of early emerging knowledge.
Details : www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Proposals due Dec 29!
So the action trajectory shape = the neurological manifold = the geometrical representation
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
(PDF) GRASPING: Within the grasping of a coffee cup we always first construct a perceptual image of a latent action trajectory shape out of the perspective of the fingertips – The scientific evidence
PDF | The explanatory model of the motoric movement action provides a universal explanation of all functional perception processes within any... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on Rese...
www.researchgate.net
December 6, 2025 at 12:57 PM
So the action trajectory shape = the neurological manifold = the geometrical representation
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
Your research fails because you think we are only occupied with the green/red decision.
That is only a tiny part of our tactical reasoning. After deciding red or green, our perception processes are mainly occupied how to bridge the gap toward the button.
That is only a tiny part of our tactical reasoning. After deciding red or green, our perception processes are mainly occupied how to bridge the gap toward the button.
December 6, 2025 at 12:50 PM
Your research fails because you think we are only occupied with the green/red decision.
That is only a tiny part of our tactical reasoning. After deciding red or green, our perception processes are mainly occupied how to bridge the gap toward the button.
That is only a tiny part of our tactical reasoning. After deciding red or green, our perception processes are mainly occupied how to bridge the gap toward the button.
When you appoint 3 autonomous foci in motor actions you get the job done. So, keep on laughing, do not study it and let science be without any clue for another 100 years. 😂😅🤣
December 6, 2025 at 9:29 AM
When you appoint 3 autonomous foci in motor actions you get the job done. So, keep on laughing, do not study it and let science be without any clue for another 100 years. 😂😅🤣
That is the exact (and very sad) problem GB. The movement sciences are stuck for 100+ years. They (you) still do not have ZERO clue about how we grasp a coffee cup. But you cling on to that it compels one undivided focus.
December 6, 2025 at 9:29 AM
That is the exact (and very sad) problem GB. The movement sciences are stuck for 100+ years. They (you) still do not have ZERO clue about how we grasp a coffee cup. But you cling on to that it compels one undivided focus.
Thanks for the info!
A side question: But you still treat the brain as the place where the representation itself resides, right?
So you will not even contemplate the Telephone Model or Gramophone Model?
A side question: But you still treat the brain as the place where the representation itself resides, right?
So you will not even contemplate the Telephone Model or Gramophone Model?
December 5, 2025 at 10:01 PM
Thanks for the info!
A side question: But you still treat the brain as the place where the representation itself resides, right?
So you will not even contemplate the Telephone Model or Gramophone Model?
A side question: But you still treat the brain as the place where the representation itself resides, right?
So you will not even contemplate the Telephone Model or Gramophone Model?
Grasping is completely explained. Why clinging on to "controller" models that are already rejected scientifically?
I leave the discussion;
Grasping is completely explianed in this videoclip:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjO6...
I leave the discussion;
Grasping is completely explianed in this videoclip:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjO6...
The perception processes during the grasping of a coffee cup
YouTube video by N.J. Mol
www.youtube.com
December 5, 2025 at 3:41 PM
Grasping is completely explained. Why clinging on to "controller" models that are already rejected scientifically?
I leave the discussion;
Grasping is completely explianed in this videoclip:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjO6...
I leave the discussion;
Grasping is completely explianed in this videoclip:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjO6...