Alfred Nobel
@alfrednobel.bsky.social
Read the BBS article: "Core Perception", Dawei Bai e.a.
It captures exactly the paradigm shift that underlies my entire research program — the very shift I have spent the past decade trying to implement.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nj-Mol/research
It captures exactly the paradigm shift that underlies my entire research program — the very shift I have spent the past decade trying to implement.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nj-Mol/research
Pinned
(PDF) If the Rubber Hand Illusion Is an Illusion, Then Car Driving Is an Illusion Too - The Illusion Evaporates the Moment the True Mechanism of Action–Perception Coupling Is Understood
PDF | If the Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI) is interpreted as an “illusion”, then the same logic would force us to classify everyday motor actions—such as... | Find, read and cite all the research you nee...
www.researchgate.net
Car driving is really weird.
You can solely manipulate something internally, and
you can solely correct it externally.
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
You can solely manipulate something internally, and
you can solely correct it externally.
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
Car driving is really weird.
You can solely manipulate something internally, and
you can solely correct it externally.
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
You can solely manipulate something internally, and
you can solely correct it externally.
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
(PDF) If the Rubber Hand Illusion Is an Illusion, Then Car Driving Is an Illusion Too - The Illusion Evaporates the Moment the True Mechanism of Action–Perception Coupling Is Understood
PDF | If the Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI) is interpreted as an “illusion”, then the same logic would force us to classify everyday motor actions—such as... | Find, read and cite all the research you nee...
www.researchgate.net
December 7, 2025 at 5:02 PM
Car driving is really weird.
You can solely manipulate something internally, and
you can solely correct it externally.
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
You can solely manipulate something internally, and
you can solely correct it externally.
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
Absolutely incorrect statement and redundant research. Please, people start to study things out of your comfort zone.
Pong explains it all.
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
Pong explains it all.
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
The Earlier You Know, the Smoother You Act | Request PDF
Request PDF | The Earlier You Know, the Smoother You Act | Intercepting a moving object with our hands requires that the moving object and the hand come into contact at some point along the object′s.....
www.researchgate.net
December 6, 2025 at 11:52 PM
Absolutely incorrect statement and redundant research. Please, people start to study things out of your comfort zone.
Pong explains it all.
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
Pong explains it all.
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
Grasping is completely explained (but we, very sophisticated scientists, are not willing to look at a 25 min. videoclip. In stead we prefer to discuss for hours the same fallacious information about grasping what is already debunked for quite some time now). 😥😥😥
Grasping is completely explained. Why clinging on to "controller" models that are already rejected scientifically?
I leave the discussion;
Grasping is completely explianed in this videoclip:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjO6...
I leave the discussion;
Grasping is completely explianed in this videoclip:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjO6...
The perception processes during the grasping of a coffee cup
YouTube video by N.J. Mol
www.youtube.com
December 5, 2025 at 3:52 PM
Grasping is completely explained (but we, very sophisticated scientists, are not willing to look at a 25 min. videoclip. In stead we prefer to discuss for hours the same fallacious information about grasping what is already debunked for quite some time now). 😥😥😥
We do not anymore need scaling devices for the RHI, because all present variables are now being appointed:
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
December 4, 2025 at 4:11 PM
We do not anymore need scaling devices for the RHI, because all present variables are now being appointed:
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
Reposted by Alfred Nobel
Ditto, and this is completely underpinned within the recent noval breakthrough of
@chazfirestone.bsky.social
@daweibai.bsky.social
@veroniqueizard.bsky.social
(Cognition is much more perceptual than conceptual)
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
@chazfirestone.bsky.social
@daweibai.bsky.social
@veroniqueizard.bsky.social
(Cognition is much more perceptual than conceptual)
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
“Core Perception”: Re-imagining Precocious Reasoning as Sophisticated Perceiving | Behavioral and Brain Sciences | Cambridge Core
“Core Perception”: Re-imagining Precocious Reasoning as Sophisticated Perceiving
www.cambridge.org
December 4, 2025 at 2:35 PM
Ditto, and this is completely underpinned within the recent noval breakthrough of
@chazfirestone.bsky.social
@daweibai.bsky.social
@veroniqueizard.bsky.social
(Cognition is much more perceptual than conceptual)
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
@chazfirestone.bsky.social
@daweibai.bsky.social
@veroniqueizard.bsky.social
(Cognition is much more perceptual than conceptual)
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
BREAKTROUGH - BREAKTROUGH - BREAKTROUGH
Call for Commentary Proposals - “Core Perception”: Re-imagining Precocious Reasoning as Sophisticated Perceiving
Title: “Core Perception”: Re-imagining Precocious Reasoning as Sophisticated Perceiving
My proposal:
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Call for Commentary Proposals - “Core Perception”: Re-imagining Precocious Reasoning as Sophisticated Perceiving
Title: “Core Perception”: Re-imagining Precocious Reasoning as Sophisticated Perceiving
My proposal:
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
December 4, 2025 at 11:55 AM
BREAKTROUGH - BREAKTROUGH - BREAKTROUGH
Call for Commentary Proposals - “Core Perception”: Re-imagining Precocious Reasoning as Sophisticated Perceiving
Title: “Core Perception”: Re-imagining Precocious Reasoning as Sophisticated Perceiving
My proposal:
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Call for Commentary Proposals - “Core Perception”: Re-imagining Precocious Reasoning as Sophisticated Perceiving
Title: “Core Perception”: Re-imagining Precocious Reasoning as Sophisticated Perceiving
My proposal:
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
THE BIG BREAKTHROUGH: "Perception, not reasoning, as the foundation of intelligence."
Please read the target article in BBS — it captures, with remarkable clarity, the very shift that has been unfolding for years: the move from interpreting early cognition as reasoning to
Please read the target article in BBS — it captures, with remarkable clarity, the very shift that has been unfolding for years: the move from interpreting early cognition as reasoning to
The call for commentaries on our "Core Perception" paper is now live! We would love to know what you think about this new perspective on the nature of early emerging knowledge.
Details here: www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Proposals due Dec 29!
Details here: www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Proposals due Dec 29!
December 3, 2025 at 9:55 PM
THE BIG BREAKTHROUGH: "Perception, not reasoning, as the foundation of intelligence."
Please read the target article in BBS — it captures, with remarkable clarity, the very shift that has been unfolding for years: the move from interpreting early cognition as reasoning to
Please read the target article in BBS — it captures, with remarkable clarity, the very shift that has been unfolding for years: the move from interpreting early cognition as reasoning to
This is a big breakthrough in science. Please, read it.
The explanatory model of the motoric movement action (my model) clarifies the execution of motor actions with this “core perception” as the concept.
The explanatory model of the motoric movement action (my model) clarifies the execution of motor actions with this “core perception” as the concept.
The call for commentaries on our "Core Perception" paper is now live! We would love to know what you think about this new perspective on the nature of early emerging knowledge.
Details here: www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Proposals due Dec 29!
Details here: www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Proposals due Dec 29!
December 3, 2025 at 6:41 PM
This is a big breakthrough in science. Please, read it.
The explanatory model of the motoric movement action (my model) clarifies the execution of motor actions with this “core perception” as the concept.
The explanatory model of the motoric movement action (my model) clarifies the execution of motor actions with this “core perception” as the concept.
It seems very logical that everything in the body connects to anything.
But it looks very much like Relative Phase Research in f.e tennis. Of course footwork depends on pressure but it has no relationship at all with the game of tennis.
But it looks very much like Relative Phase Research in f.e tennis. Of course footwork depends on pressure but it has no relationship at all with the game of tennis.
Did you know the heart imprints onto the voice? New preprint spearheaded by Marijn Hafkamp, confirming (seemingly forgotten) research from the 80's and testing for the first time possible biomechanical mechanisms (evidence points to heart-lung-voice interactions).
wimpouw.com/files/Hafkam...
wimpouw.com/files/Hafkam...
December 1, 2025 at 8:37 PM
It seems very logical that everything in the body connects to anything.
But it looks very much like Relative Phase Research in f.e tennis. Of course footwork depends on pressure but it has no relationship at all with the game of tennis.
But it looks very much like Relative Phase Research in f.e tennis. Of course footwork depends on pressure but it has no relationship at all with the game of tennis.
The main question remains: How can neurons ever contain any external information? It is a completely internal organ! They factually can not contain any visual image!
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
December 1, 2025 at 5:01 PM
The main question remains: How can neurons ever contain any external information? It is a completely internal organ! They factually can not contain any visual image!
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
"Until recently we've never studied the brain doing something that actually needed a brain."
??? MoBI research - Gramann/Makeig e.a. (2007) ???
(In which btw Mike "X" Cohen participated and quit because it was not the success that they thought it would be.)
"Arguably we're still not,
??? MoBI research - Gramann/Makeig e.a. (2007) ???
(In which btw Mike "X" Cohen participated and quit because it was not the success that they thought it would be.)
"Arguably we're still not,
"Until recently we've never studied the brain doing something that actually needed a brain."
??? MoBI research - Gramann/Makeig e.a. (2007) ???
(In which btw Mike "X" Cohen participated and quit because it was not the success that they thought it would be.)
"Arguably we're still not,
??? MoBI research - Gramann/Makeig e.a. (2007) ???
(In which btw Mike "X" Cohen participated and quit because it was not the success that they thought it would be.)
"Arguably we're still not,
December 1, 2025 at 1:22 PM
"Until recently we've never studied the brain doing something that actually needed a brain."
??? MoBI research - Gramann/Makeig e.a. (2007) ???
(In which btw Mike "X" Cohen participated and quit because it was not the success that they thought it would be.)
"Arguably we're still not,
??? MoBI research - Gramann/Makeig e.a. (2007) ???
(In which btw Mike "X" Cohen participated and quit because it was not the success that they thought it would be.)
"Arguably we're still not,
"How the brain rationally uses limited resources in working memory (WM) remains unexplored."
This has already been completely explained. Executing the cognitive representations of the sequence items (the what) will provide autonomous cognitive representations
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
This has already been completely explained. Executing the cognitive representations of the sequence items (the what) will provide autonomous cognitive representations
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
November 29, 2025 at 2:44 PM
"How the brain rationally uses limited resources in working memory (WM) remains unexplored."
This has already been completely explained. Executing the cognitive representations of the sequence items (the what) will provide autonomous cognitive representations
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
This has already been completely explained. Executing the cognitive representations of the sequence items (the what) will provide autonomous cognitive representations
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
In the exact same way I find it odd that people believe that the brain "does X". (Which you probably think).
I’ve always found it odd people believed that neurons—or chemical compounds—“do X”.
Biology is nothing if not a continual source of bonkers ways to re-use and re-combine things in nonlinear ways as new challenges arise. +
Biology is nothing if not a continual source of bonkers ways to re-use and re-combine things in nonlinear ways as new challenges arise. +
November 29, 2025 at 2:27 PM
In the exact same way I find it odd that people believe that the brain "does X". (Which you probably think).
Do neuro scientists really think visual images are present in the visual cortex? Really?
November 27, 2025 at 1:01 PM
Do neuro scientists really think visual images are present in the visual cortex? Really?
November 27, 2025 at 11:53 AM
@hugospiers.bsky.social
This is already completely explained. By executing actions we create templates. Containing 2 autonomous cognitive representations of the sequence items (what) and the space BETWEEN the sequence items (how).
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
This is already completely explained. By executing actions we create templates. Containing 2 autonomous cognitive representations of the sequence items (what) and the space BETWEEN the sequence items (how).
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
November 27, 2025 at 11:49 AM
@hugospiers.bsky.social
This is already completely explained. By executing actions we create templates. Containing 2 autonomous cognitive representations of the sequence items (what) and the space BETWEEN the sequence items (how).
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
This is already completely explained. By executing actions we create templates. Containing 2 autonomous cognitive representations of the sequence items (what) and the space BETWEEN the sequence items (how).
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
The fundamental error in this research is treating cognition as a single internal phenomenon. Real behavior requires the brain to mediate several autonomous phenomena at once — no one-system theory can ever explain that.
How do brain areas control each other? 🧠🎛️
✨In our NeurIPS 2025 Spotlight paper, we introduce a data-driven framework to answer this question using deep learning, nonlinear control, and differential geometry.🧵⬇️
✨In our NeurIPS 2025 Spotlight paper, we introduce a data-driven framework to answer this question using deep learning, nonlinear control, and differential geometry.🧵⬇️
November 26, 2025 at 9:57 PM
The fundamental error in this research is treating cognition as a single internal phenomenon. Real behavior requires the brain to mediate several autonomous phenomena at once — no one-system theory can ever explain that.
Horner’s conclusion has already been fully explained: the sequence items — the what — and the spatial structure between those items — the how — are both cognitive representations, with the what defined
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
November 26, 2025 at 7:22 PM
Horner’s conclusion has already been fully explained: the sequence items — the what — and the spatial structure between those items — the how — are both cognitive representations, with the what defined
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
If you would only know how we drive cars. It is sad that I am the only one knowing it and neuroscience is not even interested.
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
(PDF) Car Driving Can Solely Be Produced Internally and Vision Solely Serves as an External Control Process - The underlying mechanisms of car driving and the Rubber Hand Illusion are identical
PDF | The Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI) is traditionally interpreted as evidence that the brain can be misled about body ownership. However, when viewed... | Find, read and cite all the research you need...
www.researchgate.net
November 26, 2025 at 6:59 PM
If you would only know how we drive cars. It is sad that I am the only one knowing it and neuroscience is not even interested.
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
Many omissions, misconceptions and fallacies.
The complete and final explanation is clarified in f.e. Pong:
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
The complete and final explanation is clarified in f.e. Pong:
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
November 26, 2025 at 3:19 PM
Many omissions, misconceptions and fallacies.
The complete and final explanation is clarified in f.e. Pong:
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
The complete and final explanation is clarified in f.e. Pong:
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
Completely underpinned by:
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
November 26, 2025 at 3:04 PM
Completely underpinned by:
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
Ditto. Only a pity that the stadion wave and its peak, like you mentioned in your presentation, were not debated. Like the marble gains no meaning without a marble run and vice versa, all parts can solely provide meaning when studied as one phenomenon.
November 26, 2025 at 12:55 PM
Ditto. Only a pity that the stadion wave and its peak, like you mentioned in your presentation, were not debated. Like the marble gains no meaning without a marble run and vice versa, all parts can solely provide meaning when studied as one phenomenon.
Ditto. Only a pity that the stadion wave and its peak, like you mentioned in your presentation, were not debated. Like the marble gains no meaning without a marble run and vice versa, all parts can solely provide meaning when studied as one phenomenon.
November 26, 2025 at 12:55 PM
Ditto. Only a pity that the stadion wave and its peak, like you mentioned in your presentation, were not debated. Like the marble gains no meaning without a marble run and vice versa, all parts can solely provide meaning when studied as one phenomenon.
Within the long jump the run up is identical to a marble in a marble run!!!:
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
November 26, 2025 at 12:15 PM
Within the long jump the run up is identical to a marble in a marble run!!!:
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
www.researchgate.net/publication/...
Scientists who consider themselves as being the top of the field within visual perception (VP) didn't even consider two very obvious phenomena:
1. VP, besides object recognition, is mainly there to sec discover if the object is moving, by comparing all adjacent
1. VP, besides object recognition, is mainly there to sec discover if the object is moving, by comparing all adjacent
That image is from 1961 and an idealization. Here is an actual trajectory of fixational eye movements. The dots are 2 ms apart. If a midget ganglion cell, with single-cone receptive field, fires at 100 Hz, then every spike reports about a different cone. How can we ever read anything?
November 26, 2025 at 11:39 AM
Scientists who consider themselves as being the top of the field within visual perception (VP) didn't even consider two very obvious phenomena:
1. VP, besides object recognition, is mainly there to sec discover if the object is moving, by comparing all adjacent
1. VP, besides object recognition, is mainly there to sec discover if the object is moving, by comparing all adjacent