Alfred Nobel
@alfrednobel.bsky.social
120 followers 710 following 1.6K posts
In discussions with neuroscientists it is obvious they think I am a fool of some kind. I hope a day will come that they will realize that they were foolish all the way. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nj-Mol/research
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
alfrednobel.bsky.social
"How would movement detection account for different responses to the same stimulus on different days?"

That is exactly what you do not understand. Movement detection (the sec observing of movement) is a completely autonomous phenomenon. It has no relationship whatsoever with what moves!
alfrednobel.bsky.social
"At SWC, we’re unravelling aspects of certain aspects of the brain."
alfrednobel.bsky.social
Please, don't make me laugh.

"At SWC, we’re unravelling aspects of certain aspects of the brain."
sainsburywellcome.bsky.social
At SWC, we’re unravelling the mysteries of the brain 🧠

Ready to join us?

Applications for our Systems Neuroscience PhD programme are now open!

www.sainsburywellcome.org/web/content/...
alfrednobel.bsky.social
So, our brain is never still because we are always in a catching mode.
alfrednobel.bsky.social
Totally wrong!!!!!!!!!

Our brain is never still because our perception organs are implicit evolutionary and ecologically comparing mechanisms. Our brains are first and foremost comparing time frames to discover MOVEMENT.

www.researchgate.net/publication/...
alfrednobel.bsky.social
Completely explained!!!

So, why are you continuing this useless research?
sfnjournals.bsky.social
#JNeurosci: Kashefi et al. dissociate between the “what” and “how” components of motor sequence learning and provides evidence for the development of motoric sequence representations that guide optimal movement execution.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0299-25.2025
alfrednobel.bsky.social
Gaining insights from all trillion+ possible mechanisms of circuit computations. - Great!

But sadly it will never lead to any functional explanation.
alfrednobel.bsky.social
Science doesn't have a clue about consciousness. Nobody has a clue about consciousness. Consciousness? No, we have absolutely no idea!!!

Yet they are going to answer if AI is or can be conscious?!
alfrednobel.bsky.social
The outcome is nonsense. Imo the whole research is a complete waste of resources.
samillingworth.com
😴 Sleep and selective memory

Researchers found that when emotion and instruction compete, the brain prioritises what we are told to remember, not what feels emotional. Sleep spindles reflected this selective memory process.

🔗 www.frontiersin.org/journals/beh...

#SciComm #Memory #Sleep 🧪
Frontiers | Top-down instruction outweighs emotional salience: nocturnal sleep physiology indicates selective memory consolidation
IntroductionSleep plays a crucial role in memory consolidation, not only stabilizing newly encoded information but also potentially supporting forgetting. Ye...
www.frontiersin.org
alfrednobel.bsky.social
But for our perception processes the outside of our body is as strange as any other environmental object.
alfrednobel.bsky.social
Just for the record and if you really want to know how we execute this, I have explained this completely.
sfnjournals.bsky.social
#eNeuro | Acute Loss of Tactile Input Leads to General Compensatory Changes in Eye–Hand Coordination during Object Manipulation
https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0487-23.2025
Acute Loss of Tactile Input Leads to General Compensatory Changes in Eye–Hand Coordination during Object Manipulation
Current models of motor control emphasize the critical role of sensory feedback, as demonstrated by movement coordination deficits following sensory impairment. When both vision and touch are available for object-oriented manual behaviors, they serve distinct roles; vision guides the execution of planned movements, while touch provides more direct feedback on hand–object interactions. The impact of losing somatosensory feedback on eye–hand coordination during dexterous object manipulation tasks has not been thoroughly studied. Conceivably, vision is recruited to compensate for the feedback lost when touch is abolished based on the dexterity demands of the behavior. To investigate this, we tested healthy participants of either sex on a manual dexterity task requiring the movement of small metal pegs, both before and after the administration of digital anesthesia, which selectively abolished cutaneous sensations in the fingertips while preserving motor function. We recorded participants' gaze and hand positions. Despite loss of cutaneous feedback, participants successfully completed the pegboard task. However, they exhibited significantly longer trial times and altered force profiles. Notably, acute somatosensory loss triggered a rapid shift in visual behavior, characterized by a tighter coupling between gaze and hand positions across all task actions, even those not directly involving object manipulation. These changes, which occurred with anesthesia of the dominant and nondominant hands, were not evident with sham (saline) injections. Our findings underscore the contributions of sensory feedback to force control in service of dexterous object manipulation and reveal the nonselective nature of compensatory gaze–hand coordination processes.
doi.org
alfrednobel.bsky.social
"Can general artificial intelligence emerge by not following the evolution of complex brains?"

No.

(Science has no clue about consciousness, cognition or anything related to the functional perception processes within humans. - But don't study my explanatory model. You might find the real answer)
ricardsole.bsky.social
Can general artificial intelligence emerge by not following the evolution of complex brains? In this 2022 paper with @brigan.bsky.social we argued that embodiment, mind reading (mirror systems), mental time traveling... are necessary conditions
www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/24... @anilseth.bsky.social
alfrednobel.bsky.social
also make every step differently which leads to the fact that you never executed one step identical to an other step. It is not possible, even if you really want it.
alfrednobel.bsky.social
OMG!!!! Is this the state of science???!!!!

This is terrible!!! What a waste of resources.

Let's compare it to walking. Everybody walks, but you will find no person ever walking in an identical way.

But you yourself always will
jbiomech.bsky.social
😃 In a new article published in J Biomech, Santos et al. show that same age group swimmers differ in the upper-limb in-water force during the front crawl.

👀 buff.ly/P8ZZdk9
alfrednobel.bsky.social
to two irreconsilable worlds and therefor are completely autonomous.

I will not elaborate further on this worn-out topic.
alfrednobel.bsky.social
The term 'visuomotor' is extremely fallacious and has hindered scientific progress for decades.

Visual perception is exclusively external; Motor-proprioceptive perception is exclusively internal. They belong

www.researchgate.net/publication/...
alfrednobel.bsky.social
Earl(y) Miller (recently) about the peak in a wave (stadion): ‘you can’t see the wave by studying each person separately, even if you studied the whole crowd.’
alfrednobel.bsky.social
You will never able to understand anything of this at this level.

Earl Miller (recently) about the peak in a wave (stadion): ‘you can’t see the wave by studying each person separately, even if you studied the whole crowd.’

And read substack.com/@mikexcohen

(Please, give it up!?)
Mike X Cohen, PhD | Substack
ex-neuroscience professor | textbook author (linear algebra, stats, calculus) | best-selling Udemy instructor (AI, machine-learning, coding, math) | LinkedIn non-influencer | founder @ Sincxpress.com....
substack.com
alfrednobel.bsky.social
A functional understanding.

(Which will never happen without an explanatory model or the beginning of an explanatory model).
alfrednobel.bsky.social
????

Every true scientist understands that:
- chess computers don't actually understand chess,
- urine test strips aren't medical doctors,
- dogs that sniff feces can't write reports,
- and LLM's don't possess knowledge—they generate patterns.
jorisluyendijk.bsky.social
"The most devastating shortcoming of LLMs is that however many things they appear to know about the world, and however smoothly they express these things, they don’t actually know that there is a world." www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...
James Meek · Computers that want things
For all the fluency and synthetic friendliness of public-facing AI chatbots like ChatGPT, it seems important to remember...
www.lrb.co.uk