Say more about the latter part

Yeah, ok, sure. And this describes the people building infill housing how?

There is a world, perhaps not too far from our own, in which this sentence is logically coherent.

American churches are still super segregated by class and race, so it’s hard to get a read on their values from those measures alone, making the way they treat LGBTQ ppl the most effective litmus test.

I don’t know, that dude always seemed like a sketchy self-serving piece of shit. The only reason I gave him the time of day is because the alternative was Dr. Oz. The people profiled here don’t seem like opportunists or grifters. So far, so good.

Slandering developers as a class is proof enough of that. If you have a fair to make, then make it cleanly, but don’t engage in this shit, ok?

The minute you start treating developers, like some enemies of society is when you tip your hand, James.

I’m not going to weigh in on whether you’re racist, I have no idea, but I do know your politics are bullshit, and that you have no right to the thing you’re defending.

I just read this. From what’s said here, it looks like a good example of the right kind of change—Christians revolted by the anti-Christianity of Trump specifically, and negative polarized more generally by white evangelicals turning churches into socially acidic PACs.

A self-financed a bailout is a crash.

1945 would be astonished by the alliances Hitler would form 80 years after the fall of Berlin.

How dare they.

Lots of having them in the first half, I’m guessing

Which is why all the keep a big tent open for disaffected republicans stuff is so sketchy. You have to be a lot more specific about *why* they’re disaffected before welcoming them in.